Timothy Burke
banner
timothyburke.bsky.social
Timothy Burke
@timothyburke.bsky.social

Professor of History at Swarthmore College. Writes at timothyburke.substack.com, continuing from his old blog Easily Distracted. Remembers when there was no Internet, and stays up late because someone is wrong on it.

Political science 50%
Sociology 17%

When AI can pass serious tests that are the equivalent of MCAT + med school + residency, let us know. Let us know even if anybody talking about how valuable its expertise is or can be is prepared to subject it to that kind of testing regime who isn't tied to the industry.

Life has no extra speed bumps right now if you already thought very little of Chomsky.

This all leaves somewhat ambiguous who exactly the Mystery Machine is investigating and who exactly those darned kids are going to find under the mask.

So index it: the more serious the problem, the riskier it would be to turn to any expert (AI or otherwise) that doesn't have some form of verified expertise. And most experts have testing backed by statute; AI has what? Research done by researchers who are indebted to the AI companies?

Heaven forfend you pay a human being who has expertise in high-stakes problems.

I might be more interested in the Winter Olympics if there was an iceskating event that also had guns like the biathlon, with nonlethal ammunition. Like, a combination of fencing and gun-fu and skating.

I feel like I've read some similar anecdotes from back when Lewis arrived--that he had a lot of people who offered to help him out, broker connections to the existing staff, give him the benefit of the doubt, and he shot all of it down. Feels as if he always knew he was there as a hatchet man.

It's the little failures that really hurt, the accumulating paper cuts that rip open what was a democracy and expose it to the septic shock that is Trumpism. Like a TV network going out of its way to censor the rest of the world booing the American Vice-President at the Olympics.

It is kind of difficult after reading that there's a kind of cheating in ski jumping that involves getting liquid injected into your penis so you get a bigger suit so the bigger suit helps your aerodynamics so that you win to not think "maybe competition has kind of lost the script, yeah?"

That's the other reason I will avoid any more Cassandra work. In more than twenty years of online writing, I've generally seen the bad things coming, been told I'm exaggerating, and realized that this response meant I was right and nothing could stop what I was seeing.

Fighting ICE on the grounds of immigration policy alone is important for every American who believes in fairness and justice. But ICE is being prepared for much more than that, if things keep going as they are. We have to stop it now to keep those terrible futures from coming to pass.

The other thing I strongly suspect they are preparing for that is key to ICE's insistence on anonymity and experiments in extra-judicial and unconstitutional action are the detentions of and possible deportations or indefinite imprisonment of citizens who are seen as political enemies. 6/

We should continue pulling out all the stops, because I strongly suspect Miller etc. are preparing the ground for mass deportations of citizens who were born to undocumented immigrants and at least some recently naturalized citizens, if SCOTUS gives them a green light. Which it might. 5/

Miller & Co are testing what the material limitations on a nationwide force taking extrajudicial action directed by the White House might be if that force is contested by the population. So far the news there is encouraging for us--Americans are stressing even limited ICE deployment very hard. 4/

The mainstream press who earnestly see what ICE is doing as lying entirely within the confines of an American debate about immigration, even if that media is critical of the policies and actions so far, are under-imagining what is being tested here. 3/

So while I have not wanted to say "here's what's coming next" in part because who wants to give these guys ideas, I think you can see in the actions of ICE a series of experiments that are terrifying in their implications and should have everyone in the streets everywhere. 2/

Miller and Vought plainly actually have several "comprehensive plans"--they're publicly available. But I also think it's not wrong to see plans emerging from circumstance. If we can see the fearful possibilities and hopeful counter-moves, they can too. 1/

Does she think U2 normally sings in Gaelic?

There's nothing left in DHS that is legitimate, so if Dems not playing ball shuts it down, mission accomplished. I think by the way that should happen to any federal agency where the White House is no longer provisioning service and benefits to all states and territories equally and without bias.

Star Trek's entire history at this point says that synthetic beings and logic-driven aliens famously struggle to understand language's ambiguities, but now we're seeing that mimicry of language is the easiest thing for synthetics and that rigorous logic is quite good with language.

It's not how men behave. It's not how professors practice. It's not what employers expect. I have read thousands and thousands of reference letters by faculty and I've never seen one that offers a complimentary physical description of the person recommended, of either gender.
I have been writing letters of recommendation for just shy of thirty years— 17 students this year alone— in ratios that more or less track the majority-women population of liberal arts students.

Obviously I have never commented on a student's looks... and no recipient has ever called me to ask.
Hey, so, I don’t do civil litigation, is it generally considered good when the judge does this?

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

As far as I can tell, there are people than Epstein and Maxwell who could have been charged or at least investigated for trafficking but no police or judicial system seems to have tried--there's a "Daniel Siad" who appears to have been involved in identifying and transporting women, for example.

I really hate statements like "humans conquered the world with language"--these sweeping, reductive, one-variable-to-explain-everything statements that infest universal histories like weevils. Like bad openings of bad undergraduate writing from the days before AI did bad writing for undergraduates.
This is the Yale professor's explanation for why he described the physical attractiveness of a student in an email to Epstein. He explicitly says he regrets nothing about their association.

Again, I'm so happy Yale hired David Brooks to restore trust.

yaledailynews.com/articles/gel...

I hope I'm allowed to think this? The way that online Namibians are dunking on online Nigerians and vice-versa right now is very brilliant if also depressing in various ways. Unfortunately a lot of it is on X.

There is also an interesting d) set of people. Folks who Epstein and John Brockman tried to draw into Epstein's orbit who turned down all invites and never responded to him. A smaller group of e) people who Brockman or others tried to get Epstein interested in that Epstein rejected as uninteresting.

So spending some hours looking at the Epstein files, I see the following: a) really gross people that associated with him closely; b) greedy or status-seeking people eager to build a relationship with him; c) folks who met him once or twice but don't show up a lot. 1/

Thank you for compiling these and being careful about the criteria. There are a lot of names that show up in the files just because John Brockman is trying to get Epstein to show an interest in that person or is inviting them to an Edge meeting and letting Epstein know.