Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
banner
lisastampnitzky.bsky.social
Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
@lisastampnitzky.bsky.social
Writer, teacher, cat lady, etc. Thinking about truth, knowledge, secrecy, speakability, torture, “terrorism”, etc.

Book
https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/subjects/sociology/political-sociology/disciplining-terror-how-experts-invented-terrorism
Pinned
February 1, 2026 at 3:40 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
the arrest of journalists in minneapolis, including don lemon, is more evidence that the only move the administration knows how to make is to use force, and does not know how to respond when that force is met with defiance and indifference.
January 30, 2026 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
I don't like to talk about stories before they are fully reported, but I am writing on ICE in a Minnesota town that isn't Minneapolis. However bad you think it is, it is worse. It is a campaign of pure terror whose only strategic goal is more terror. There is no strategy other than to break people.
January 31, 2026 at 9:03 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
I took a close look at the latest Department of Homeland Security AI use case inventory, which details over 200 applications across DHS component agencies, including CBP and ICE. DHS is rapidly deploying these tools in US cities, while increasingly engaging in violence and defying court orders.
DHS AI Surveillance Arsenal Grows as Agency Defies Courts
A Department of Homeland Security AI inventory contains details on new tools used by ICE and border patrol agents in Trump's deportation campaign.
www.techpolicy.press
February 1, 2026 at 2:26 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
reposting both for underlying insight and for solid use of "zugzwang"
one of the key motions of protest is that it places the adversary in zugzwang: either they abide the protest, and look weak, or attack the protest, and look cruel
February 1, 2026 at 9:46 AM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
What I’m seeing here is that Epstein is a nexus point for the “intellectual” cabal that shores up the race science justifying our current immigration and anti-DEI policies (Huberman), as well the tone policing moderates (Brooks) that hamstrings oppositions. Oh and their billionaire benefactors.
January 31, 2026 at 4:32 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
Academics vying for a spot in Epstein‘s world. There are so many. I feel the need to make a thread, so I don’t keep confusing them. 1/
January 31, 2026 at 9:02 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
I guess the best-available defense to this sort of thing—lots of friendly emails and visits with someone recently convicted of procuring a child for the purposes of prostitution, I mean—is something like “He seemed to have lots of money and connections and I would have liked a little piece of that”
January 31, 2026 at 3:42 PM
Color me shocked that Nicholas Christakis is in the Epstein files 👀
January 31, 2026 at 10:46 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
“There’s no single answer that will solve all our future problems. There’s no magic bullet. Instead there are thousands of answers—at least. You can be one of them if you choose to be.”

― Octavia E. Butler, A Few Rules for Predicting the Future: An Essay
January 31, 2026 at 7:57 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
The co-author of "How Democracies Die" thinks Trump is going further in his crackdown on the press than strongmen around the world. Via @status.news

(Almost everyone who studies these things is shocked not by what he's doing, but by how fast its moving.)
January 31, 2026 at 5:25 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
These were the people who held the careers of female scholars in their hands . This is who was shaping or epistemological world
Here’s Duke behavioral economist Dan Ariely asking Jeffrey Epstein for “the name and email of the redhead that was here with you.” This is four years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for procuring a child for prostitution.
Doo do doo
January 31, 2026 at 5:14 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
real question is which prominent trump administration figures *aren't* in the epstein files?
January 31, 2026 at 4:35 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
Next time choose *not* to get played.
January 31, 2026 at 1:48 PM
Trumps so called drawdown from Minneapolis is as fake as the Israeli “ceasefire” in Gaza (where the IDF just killed 30 more people)
Absolutely surreal to continue to hear about drawdowns and lowered temperatures and things calming down in Minneapolis when, as far as I can tell, literally nothing has changed on the ground
January 31, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
For the record, henceforth if you describe “networking” to me as a necessary professional skill, just know, in my head, I’m thinking of Jeffrey Epstein tremendous “networking” acumen. Fair warning.
January 31, 2026 at 2:58 AM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
remember when the panama papers came out and we found out every rich person on earth was committing tax fraud and then nothing happened
January 31, 2026 at 12:23 PM
Ughhhhh.

Also “The academic subsequently sought help from the dean of the Oxford Saïd Business School, Professor Soumitra Dutta, who made a sexual pass at her. An investigation into him upheld three allegations of harassment and Professor Dutta has since left the university.”
January 31, 2026 at 1:21 PM
The world is descending into fascism but at least the UK press consistently serves up columnists with the most amusing names
January 31, 2026 at 11:22 AM
Status
January 31, 2026 at 12:35 AM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
by popular request i have turned the meme into a blog post, which explains how it works, links to the template file and includes a selection of examples from the thread

#KirbyFraming
January 29, 2026 at 6:25 AM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
There’s a lot of expertise on Bluesky, and the remarkable thing is that the Trump regime has done something illegal in everyone’s area. It’s really a crime syndicate masquerading as government.
January 31, 2026 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
In 2021 I was telling people in my field of art history to stop legitimizing the use of image recognition, to stop applying for grants to use AI in identifying the subjects of portraiture bc this was what such work was being used to further. All this was obvious. theconversation.com/how-ai-is-hi...
January 30, 2026 at 12:24 PM
Reposted by Lisa Stampnitzky, Highly Annoying, PhD
And I said during the event that what he is offering is a tolerance of cruelty; thinking on it further now I think you could say that precisely what he is offering is that he will not care about the rule of law and you don't have to either, you can save the nation/Western civ unconstrained by rights
January 30, 2026 at 7:26 PM