Jon Williamson
jonwilliamson.uk
Jon Williamson
@jonwilliamson.uk

Philosophy of science, medicine, AI, & law
jonwilliamson.uk

Computer science 41%
Philosophy 24%

13 November 2025: workshop on Qualitative Evidence in Systematic Review, University of Manchester. All welcome.
jonwilliamson.uk/conferences/...
Qualitative evidence in systematic review
Jon Williamson’s research pages: Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

Online talk, 21 October. Miriam Solomon (Temple University). How to be an Evidential Pluralist. All welcome! jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

Reposted by Jon Williamson

1/3 Full house in Aula Baratto at Ca' Foscari University for Day 2 of #ENPOSS2025. Morning sessions include a symposium chaired by @mjbuedo.bsky.social on 'Pros and Cons of Evidential Pluralism in the Social Sciences'

Online talk, 29 September. Jonathan Fuller (Pittsburgh). An argument framework for evidence synthesis and evidence-to-decision analysis. All welcome! jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

Reposted by Jon Williamson

Please circulate: we're hiring a postdoctoral research associate with expertise in philosophy of scientific method and philosophy of causality. Apply here: jobs.manchester.ac.uk/Job/JobDetai.... A 2nd postdoc job, for someone with expertise in evidence review and research methods, coming soon.

Many thanks to Jie Gao, Rosa Runhardt, Erik Weber and Michael Wilde for a very nice symposium on the book Evidential Pluralism in the Social Sciences. Both the book and most of the papers are available open access. link.springer.com/collections/... #philsky #philsci
Book Symposium: Evidential Pluralism in the Social Sciences (Yafeng Shan & Jon Williamson)
Evidential Pluralism in Social Sciences by Yafeng Shan and Jon Williamson. Routledge, 2023.In this book, Shan and Williamson contend that Evidential ...
link.springer.com

21 July, 3-4.30pm. Rosa Runhardt (Radboud) & Jon Williamson (Manchester). Evidential Pluralism and educational ethnography. All welcome! jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

Online talk, 30 June. 3-4.30pm. Federica Russo (Utrecht). How is Who. Evidence as Clues for Action in Participatory Research Interventions. All welcome. jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

On 16 June, an online talk by Phyllis Illari (UCL). Epistemic games and causal problems: a framework for teaching the evaluation of scientific information. All welcome! jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

A nice introductory podcast on EBM+ by the UK Centre of Excellence on in-silico Regulatory Science and Innovation @afrangi.bsky.social : www.podbean.com/media/share/...
Unveiling Evidence-Based Medicine Plus and Mechanistic Reasoning
What is Evidence-Based Medicine Plus? This podcast episode explores the transformative power of computational modelling and simulated clinical trials in medical innovation. Discover the significance o...
www.podbean.com
PhD Timeline xkcd.com/3081

That's a great question. Evidential Pluralism tries to show constructively that diverse evidence can be integrated in a coherent way in causal evaluation. A good example of how this works well in practice is the carcinogenicity evaluation procedure of IARC: monographs.iarc.who.int/iarc-monogra...
IARC Monographs Preamble – Preamble to the IARC Monographs (amended January 2019)
monographs.iarc.who.int

Yes short arguments are often more secure. Nothing substantial written up I'm afraid, but I have some brief remarks at the end of this editorial riviste.unimi.it/index.php/th...
View of Editorial | The Reasoner
riviste.unimi.it

Plus, technical causal inferences often rest on unjustified modelling assumptions and tenuous presuppositions of the formal framework. Applied causal inferences can be more secure precisely because of their lack of technical sophistication.

Some very welcome respite from trade wars: Progic 2025 at CMU www.cmu.edu/progic2025/h...
Home - Progic 2025 - The 12th Workshop on Combining Probability and Logic - Carnegie Mellon University
Summarize your website here; it will help search engines find and prioritize your content.
www.cmu.edu

14 April, 3-4.30pm UK time. Online talk. Alexandra Trofimov (Manchester). *How Evidential Pluralism mitigates epistemic injustice in evidence-based evaluation*. All welcome! jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

A series of online talks on Evidential Pluralism - all welcome: jonwilliamson.uk/mosep
Manchester online seminars on Evidential Pluralism
Philosophy of Science, Medicine, AI and Law; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Logic
jonwilliamson.uk

Reposted by Jon Williamson

AI is that drunk bloke who's always in the pub, jumping into other people's conversations and talking absolute bollocks.

Perhaps it's possible to formalise evidence evaluation *and* combine different types of evidence. Here's a shameless plug for a recent paper that attempts this to some extent: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Applying evidential pluralism to evidence-based law: EBL+
Evidence-based law seeks to make best use of evidence to assess the effectiveness of laws and regulations. The question arises as to how exactly to make best use of evidence. This paper argues that...
www.tandfonline.com

Not humanities enough. Perhaps the aim of a medical humanities paper is to provide an interesting perspective or interpretation, while philosophy of medicine theorises about medicine in a more analytical or general way.

I was told by someone working in medical humanities that philosophy of medicine doesn't qualify for medical humanities funding. I was a bit put out by this, but it does seem that most philosophy of medicine papers are different in kind from medical humanities papers.

The Reasoner (an interdisciplinary gazette for research on reasoning, inference and method) has a new format: thereasoner.org
The Reasoner
thereasoner.org

Reposted by Jon Williamson

Newly published: Perspectives on Logics for Data-Driven Reasoning, edited by Hykel Hosni and Jürgen Landes. Springer, 2025. doi.org/10.1007/978-...
Perspectives on Logics for Data-driven Reasoning
Provides a state-of-the-art presentation of the role logic can have in making the most of the current opportunities, while making explicit the challenges
doi.org

How should we evaluate whether a law is effective? We can't conduct blinded trials that randomise a law to individuals, so orthodox evidence-based evaluation methods fail. My colleague Alexandra Trofimov and I argue for an approach based on Evidential Pluralism: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Applying evidential pluralism to evidence-based law: EBL+
Evidence-based law seeks to make best use of evidence to assess the effectiveness of laws and regulations. The question arises as to how exactly to make best use of evidence. This paper argues that...
www.tandfonline.com

Just arriving on my first day of a new job at Manchester university. Very excited to be joining the philosophy department here.

Reposted by Jon Williamson

If you protest against the destruction of our planet, you are more likely to be arrested in Britain than anywhere else in the world. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Britain leads the world in cracking down on climate activism, study finds
Research shows UK police arrest environmental and climate protesters at three times the average global rate
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by Jon Williamson

CMU is hosting the 2025 Progic Conference on combining probability and logic. This year's focus: Theoretical Approaches to Learning and Learnability

Deadline for abstracts is December 15. I cannot derive your probability of getting in, but you should submit anyway :)

www.cmu.edu/progic2025/c...
Call for Papers - Progic 2025 - The 12th Workshop on Combining Probability and Logic - Carnegie Mellon University
Summarize your website here; it will help search engines find and prioritize your content.
www.cmu.edu

Please add me too

Me too please!