Jedidiah Carlson
LightNews LightNews
banner
jedidiahcarlson.com
Jedidiah Carlson
@jedidiahcarlson.com
2.7K followers 790 following 110 posts
Population genetics, doom metal, anti-racism, metaresearch, & eye-rolling. Stats prof at Macalester College. He/Him.

https://jedidiahcarlson.com
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
jedidiahcarlson.com
Jedidiah Carlson @jedidiahcarlson.com · Nov 8
🧵One of the most encouraging trends in academia over the last decade is the semi-spontaneous emergence of a massive interdisciplinary network committed to confronting scientific racism in all of its disgusting forms and applications
jowiph.bsky.social Jon Phillips @jowiph.bsky.social · Nov 6
I decided to go ahead and make a starter pack of historians, scientists, and others who work on scientific racism. If you’d like to be added to the pack (or removed from it), let me know.

go.bsky.app/E9PN3oG
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
michaelhendricks.bsky.social
Is it "surprising research"? @dasharez0ne.bsky.social taught us all this years ago.
November 10, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
brianrwasik.bsky.social
Whoop whoop
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 9h
Trump: "Nobody knows what magnets are."
November 10, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
kmfao.bsky.social
Yeah :D
The opening text of Master and Commander, but its the style of a Zohran for Mayor poster. "April, 1805. Napoleon is master of Europe. Only the British fleet stands before him. Oceans are now battlefields."
November 9, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
michaelhendricks.bsky.social
It's irritating that they describe the effects of his racism as limited to causing controversy within science and reputational consequences for himself rather than giving an immeasurable boost, false veneer of legitimacy, and idiot-friendly prestige to modern scientific racism and eugenics.
November 7, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
parkermolloy.com
Ms. Rachel 2028
professor_neil 10/29/25 "Should poors be allowed to experience even a brief moment of happiness?" paula_andream1 › SNAP benefits 17h Should SNAP pay for little Debbies oatmeal crème pies? 1/2 Best Seller Oatmeal Creme Pies Little Debbie Oatmeal Crème Pies, 12 Individually Wrapped Sandwich Cookies, 16.2 OZ Box Oatmeal 16.2 Ounce (Pack of 1) 4.6 責責丸（18K） 20K+ bought in past month $297 ($0.18/ounce) SNAP EBT eligible Vprime Overnight FREE delivery Overnight 4 AM - 8 AM on $25 of qualifying items Add to cart 9 + © 34K Q 2.1K S 1.2K 248 msracheltorlittles · 10/29/25 ... I want my taxes to pay for oatmeal cream pies. These are so good. Just not bombs • 60.2K • 271 G2.3K
November 8, 2025 at 4:53 PM
jedidiahcarlson.com
Oh so we're kink-shaming Herasight's entire customer base now?
theophite.bsky.social rev. howard arson @theophite.bsky.social · 3d
a few hundred point mutations cannot be the cause of racial differences unless highly correlated.

flip one coin. fifty-fifty chance it's heads. flip two coins, 25% chance. if white people are durably smarter, it's because they flip five hundred coins whenever they fuck and it's always all heads.
November 8, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
arbelharpak.bsky.social
@jbenning.bsky.social @jedidiahcarlson.com
et al. exemplify how confounding can lead to flawed inference on genetic causality. In studies of human behavior and social outcomes, the cost of downplaying this problem can be steep. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.... bsky.app/profile/jben...
November 7, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
We are concerned that a publishing culture which rewards sensationalism may drive a decline in standards of rigor. In that respect, everyone has a role to play: it is crucial that researchers, reviewers and editors uphold high standards in their handling of these issues.
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
The study of the genetics underlying human behavior and social outcomes, with its fraught history and heightened potential for misappropriation, requires rigorous science. The failure to fully reckon with confounding fuels misinterpretation of genetics research and impedes scientific progress.
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
(iii) how confounding is obscured or even leveraged in a broader class of contemporary genetic studies. In particular, we discuss where claims about genetic causality may reach beyond the evidence.
Confounding among families induces biases in genome wide association studies (GWAS). ‘Population structure confounding’ in genomic data relates to correlations between the structure of genetic relatedness in a GWAS sample (exemplified by the orange-to-purple gradient) and the phenotype studied. Here we show genetic sequences from individuals 1−4 at top left, with their attendant phenotypes (height) at top right. For a given genetic variant, individuals with purple alleles will tend to be taller than those with orange alleles, regardless of the variant’s causal effect on height. This confounding affects any variants that reflect this axis of genetic population structure—typically many millions of variants. While researchers often use methods that adjust for population structure in an attempt to avoid spurious associations, the extent of residual confounding in GWAS remains unclear.
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
(ii) a study by Song & Zhang (2024) purporting to solve a paradox: the evolutionary maintenance of genetic variants that increase same-sex sexual behavior, despite being “reproductively disadvantageous.”
(a) Song & Zhang [32] show that the estimated genetic correlation between BSB (a measure of bisexual behaviour) in males and number of children is significantly different from zero (left diagram). They hypothesized the causal structure shown in the right diagram: genetic variants affecting BSB affect the number of children only through their simultaneous effect on risk-taking behaviour. When adjusting for genetic effects on risk-taking behaviour, the partial (residualized) genetic correlation between BSB and number of children is no longer significantly non-zero. They take this observation as evidence for their hypothesis. (b) When we repeat this analysis but replace risk taking with a variety of other measures (‘measure X,’ blue in causal diagram), 16 out of 18 measures we examined yield a partial genetic correlation between BSB and number of children that does not significantly differ from zero (bars show 95% confidence intervals). Therefore, the data are equally consistent with the hypothesis that genetic variants driving BSB are maintained through evolution as a byproduct of selection on any of these 16 measures. We note that most of these measures—like risk-taking behaviour—have a significant partial genetic correlation with number of children. Four of the measures, denoted with an asterisk, are not. (c) Male participants in the study sample who reported having first had sex before the age of 13 (including victims of childhood sexual assault, many of which would have had same-sex perpetrators) are likelier to be classified as BSB by the criteria used in Song & Zhang [32]. N, total number of males in each group.
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
(i) a study by Clark (2023) suggesting that patterns of similarity in social status between relatives indicate that social status is largely determined by one’s DNA
Confounding between genetic and non-genetic factors influencing traits. (a) Confounding within families. Non-genetic transmission can parallel genetic transmission and their respective effects are confounded in observational data. Illustrated is a model where a trait value is the sum of an inherited component from parents and random noise. Under this model, the expected resemblance between relatives depends on transmissibility (t2, the portion of trait variation attributable to the transmitted component) and a rate of decay across genealogical distance (the ‘persistence rate,’ b, which increases with increasing degree of assortative mating). Ignoring the confounding of genetic and non-genetic transmission in the data, Clark [3] misassigns all transmission as genetic heritability and all assortative mating to be on a latent ‘social genotype’. Reanalyses of data from Clark [3] challenge the paper’s claims. (a) Example of confounding between genetic and non-genetic transmission. The relationship between paternal wealth and a measure of social status suggest at least one source of confounding between genetic and non-genetic transmission. Across relative pairs, correlation in occupational status is highly correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.91) with those relatives’ correlation in paternal wealth. Inset shows that individual occupational status is strongly correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.72) with father’s wealth. (b) Pseudoreplication distorted estimates of familial correlations. Familial correlations (95% confidence interval (CI)) in occupational status (1780−1859) using the approach employed by [3] (in gold) involved pervasive, non-uniform pseudoreplication (electronic supplementary material, note S6). For example, the (1780−1859) occupational status correlation for fourth cousins is calculated from 17 382 pairs, derived from only 1878 unique individuals. In teal we show conservative estimates using only a single relative pair per surname (means and 95% CI over 1000 bootstrap samples are plotted for each familial correlation), which are therefore not susceptible to pseudoreplication. Distant cousins show dramatically higher correlations after adjusting for pseudoreplication. (c) Signals of change in social mobility. Parent-offspring correlations in multiple status measures generally decrease over time in Clark’s [3] data, in contrast to claims of stagnant social mobility made in the original paper. To mitigate pseudoreplication, we calculated correlations using one pair from each surname (as in (b)). Shown are average correlations (95% CI) across 500 bootstrap iterations of correlation estimation. The electronic supplementary material, figure S13 shows two complementary analyses estimating correlations either without accounting for pseudoreplication, or using percentile ranks—both result in similar trends.
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
We detail how multiple modes of confounding are incompletely understood and underappreciated in many contemporary papers. We illustrate these issues through reanalysis of data from case studies and discussion of the literature. We focus on…
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
Full OA paper here: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
Confounding fuels misinterpretation in human genetics | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
The scientific literature has seen a resurgence of interest in genetic influences on human behaviour and socioeconomic outcomes. Such studies face the central difficulty of distinguishing possible cau...
royalsocietypublishing.org
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jbenning.bsky.social
We're excited to share the final version of our paper, where we demonstrate how confounding remains a thorny problem for claims about causal genetic influences on human behavioral and socioeconomic outcomes. (w/ @jedidiahcarlson.com @oliviarxiv.bsky.social Ruth Shaw @arbelharpak.bsky.social) 🧵👇
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
thefarce.org
"We power ICE," Karp said on Monday.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp calls his company the first to be 'completely anti-woke'
Palantir sees "accelerating and otherworldly growth" as CEO Alex Karp highlights working with ICE and supporting Israel on an earnings call.
www.businessinsider.com
November 7, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
Nuremburg trials is the moderate position
lyndab08.bsky.social Lynda Lopez @lyndab08.bsky.social · 4d
He said that the agents would throw food at them to eat. The agents threatened to withhold food for a week and to beat him up if he didn't sign deportation papers. He said he saw others refuse and get beaten/receive no food. He signed because he was afraid.
November 7, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
jeffspence.github.io
How do GWAS and rare variant burden tests rank gene signals?

In new work @nature.com with @hakha.bsky.social, @jkpritch.bsky.social, and our wonderful coauthors we find that the key factors are what we call Specificity, Length, and Luck!

🧬🧪🧵

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Specificity, length and luck drive gene rankings in association studies - Nature
Genetic association tests prioritize candidate genes based on different criteria.
www.nature.com
November 7, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
rincewind.run
great day for the legal theory of "not guilty if it's funny enough"
November 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
adamserwer.bsky.social
Look I get publishing a broad spectrum of opinions but I already fed them this morning
Parody of Times headline "Did Humans Going to Work Ruin Everything?" Dek: That wasn't enough wet food, I'm STARVING
November 6, 2025 at 10:56 PM
jedidiahcarlson.com
[tune of "Ghostbusters"] 🎶 skeetin' makes me feel good 🎶
November 6, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
merz.bsky.social
A new paper is what I use when the old roll runs out.
November 6, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
paulcope.land
“yeah I have to go to the phrenologists office later this week to get a micro loan for my groceries.”
jedidiahcarlson.com Jedidiah Carlson @jedidiahcarlson.com · 4d
bro are you fucking kidding me
November 6, 2025 at 10:22 PM
jedidiahcarlson.com
bro are you fucking kidding me
quote from the Economist article which says "[study authors] are now looking at whether AI facial analysis can give lenders useful clues about a person’s propensity to repay loans. For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing."
November 6, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Reposted by Jedidiah Carlson
hannahthomasy.bsky.social
If you've ever rolled your eyes about research claiming that complex traits (from chocolate preference to socioeconomic status) have simple genetic explanations, check out this great paper from @jbenning.bsky.social @jedidiahcarlson.com @oliviarxiv.bsky.social Ruth Shaw @arbelharpak.bsky.social 🧪🧬
Confounding fuels misinterpretation in human genetics | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
The scientific literature has seen a resurgence of interest in genetic influences on human behaviour and socioeconomic outcomes. Such studies face the central difficulty of distinguishing possible causal influences, in particular genetic and non-genetic ...
royalsocietypublishing.org
November 5, 2025 at 9:35 PM