Isonzeando
@isonzeando.bsky.social
Student of history / Warhammer lover / Too many ideas and not enough time / Reach heaven through violence / Damn you Elon / Play Brawl Arcane!
Reposted by Isonzeando
so it is very apparent that
1) You are not going to be able to know for sure who or where an order came from, much less if it is legal
2) The President and SecDef will disavow any order that retroactively proves to be unpopular or risky
1) You are not going to be able to know for sure who or where an order came from, much less if it is legal
2) The President and SecDef will disavow any order that retroactively proves to be unpopular or risky
December 1, 2025 at 4:17 PM
so it is very apparent that
1) You are not going to be able to know for sure who or where an order came from, much less if it is legal
2) The President and SecDef will disavow any order that retroactively proves to be unpopular or risky
1) You are not going to be able to know for sure who or where an order came from, much less if it is legal
2) The President and SecDef will disavow any order that retroactively proves to be unpopular or risky
Reposted by Isonzeando
The WH statement is carefully phrased and interesting for three reasons:
1. claims second strike was lawful, but
2. denies that POTUS or SecDef specifically ordered it (putting it all on ADM Bradley)
3. asserts, falsely, that FTO designation is enough justification to authorize military action
1. claims second strike was lawful, but
2. denies that POTUS or SecDef specifically ordered it (putting it all on ADM Bradley)
3. asserts, falsely, that FTO designation is enough justification to authorize military action
WATCH: “What makes you say the 2nd strike was lawful? Did Hegseth say everyone should be killed? Does pardoning the drug trafficking Honduran ex-president undercut the message?”
Leavitt now admits a follow-up bombing took place to kill the survivors, insists it was “lawful”
Leavitt now admits a follow-up bombing took place to kill the survivors, insists it was “lawful”
December 1, 2025 at 7:20 PM
The WH statement is carefully phrased and interesting for three reasons:
1. claims second strike was lawful, but
2. denies that POTUS or SecDef specifically ordered it (putting it all on ADM Bradley)
3. asserts, falsely, that FTO designation is enough justification to authorize military action
1. claims second strike was lawful, but
2. denies that POTUS or SecDef specifically ordered it (putting it all on ADM Bradley)
3. asserts, falsely, that FTO designation is enough justification to authorize military action
Reposted by Isonzeando
“the combat decisions he has made” is some incredible Blue Falconry lmao
December 2, 2025 at 2:02 AM
“the combat decisions he has made” is some incredible Blue Falconry lmao
Reposted by Isonzeando
Think it through: worst case they, what, court-martial him for refusing? Easiest slam-dunk defense EVER and a PR nightmare for the administration. Fire him for “loss of confidence” and allowed to retire with a huge pension? lol okay. Most likely they meekly back down and do nothing.
December 2, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Think it through: worst case they, what, court-martial him for refusing? Easiest slam-dunk defense EVER and a PR nightmare for the administration. Fire him for “loss of confidence” and allowed to retire with a huge pension? lol okay. Most likely they meekly back down and do nothing.
Reposted by Isonzeando
For this situation specifically, Bradley was the only one in the entire chain who could have refused at essentially zero risk to himself. So no, he shouldn’t get credit for saying “but Pete told me to” when it all comes out.
December 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM
For this situation specifically, Bradley was the only one in the entire chain who could have refused at essentially zero risk to himself. So no, he shouldn’t get credit for saying “but Pete told me to” when it all comes out.
Reposted by Isonzeando
If that is indeed the case then Bradley should testify to it because it is the truth and to provide a record for later on … but no, he should get no credit or leniency for it.
Sorry not sorry, wearing stars comes with big boy responsibility.
Sorry not sorry, wearing stars comes with big boy responsibility.
If Hegseth gave the order (of course he did) all Bradley has to do is testify to that effect to significantly reduce his own sentence when the time comes.
Bradley going to learn how far being an apolitical military professional gets you (not very)
December 2, 2025 at 1:15 AM
If that is indeed the case then Bradley should testify to it because it is the truth and to provide a record for later on … but no, he should get no credit or leniency for it.
Sorry not sorry, wearing stars comes with big boy responsibility.
Sorry not sorry, wearing stars comes with big boy responsibility.
Reposted by Isonzeando
It’s important to note from a military perspective that if a subordinate is about to give an unlawful order & his senior knows about it, it’s also a requirement for the senior official to stop him from executing it. And then counsel/discipline him.
So there’s that, too.
So there’s that, too.
December 2, 2025 at 1:58 AM
It’s important to note from a military perspective that if a subordinate is about to give an unlawful order & his senior knows about it, it’s also a requirement for the senior official to stop him from executing it. And then counsel/discipline him.
So there’s that, too.
So there’s that, too.
Reposted by Isonzeando
Damn they didn’t even hesitate to throw his ass under the bus huh?
REPORTER: Does the administration deny that that second strike happened, or did it happen and the administration denies that Hegseth gave the order?
LEAVITT: The latter. Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. He worked well within his authority and the law.
LEAVITT: The latter. Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. He worked well within his authority and the law.
December 1, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Damn they didn’t even hesitate to throw his ass under the bus huh?
Reposted by Isonzeando
Invoking "color revolutions" as a boogeyman like this really goes to show how much these guys have cooked their brains on Russian propaganda specifically.
Sen. Eric Schmitt: "This is the language of a color revolution where you're calling on military men and women to disobey orders."
December 1, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Invoking "color revolutions" as a boogeyman like this really goes to show how much these guys have cooked their brains on Russian propaganda specifically.
Reposted by Isonzeando
Bradley and SOCOM deserve to get nuked from civilian oversight (hopefully)
December 1, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Bradley and SOCOM deserve to get nuked from civilian oversight (hopefully)
Reposted by Isonzeando
>the president and SecDef finally loosen ROE, no more dumb lib shit
>>he disavows immediately when people start asking questions
>>he disavows immediately when people start asking questions
December 1, 2025 at 4:41 PM
>the president and SecDef finally loosen ROE, no more dumb lib shit
>>he disavows immediately when people start asking questions
>>he disavows immediately when people start asking questions
Reposted by Isonzeando
For the record, this is the point of having a “warrior” culture, to having notions of honor attached to the military profession is so that dishonor can is feared. Military service is honored but if you fail to uphold standards—including refusing illegal orders—you must be dishonored.
This is also why I hate hearing “it’s hard to disobey orders.” It’s hard to endure danger. It’s hard to not give up information. That’s precisely why there must be no ground given on the matter—when you bear arms, you take on that responsibility and must endure the consequences if you fail.
anyways read theory. american soldiers do not swear loyalty to the commander-in-chief. they swear loyalty to the constitution. the difference matters--not in sunny skies and good weather, but on bad days, when you are pressed to the breaking point--that is precisely when it matters most.
November 30, 2025 at 8:37 PM
For the record, this is the point of having a “warrior” culture, to having notions of honor attached to the military profession is so that dishonor can is feared. Military service is honored but if you fail to uphold standards—including refusing illegal orders—you must be dishonored.
Reposted by Isonzeando
“I read Clausewitz”
No you didn’t
No you didn’t
December 2, 2025 at 2:18 AM
“I read Clausewitz”
No you didn’t
No you didn’t
Reposted by Isonzeando
If they read theory, maybe these morons at the pentagon and DOD would have thought about that beforehand
December 2, 2025 at 2:16 AM
If they read theory, maybe these morons at the pentagon and DOD would have thought about that beforehand
Reposted by Isonzeando
Unironically true
December 2, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Unironically true
Reposted by Isonzeando
They deserve the backlash for being stupid enough to think the drunk Fox News host and co. weren’t going to throw them under the bus
December 2, 2025 at 2:49 AM
They deserve the backlash for being stupid enough to think the drunk Fox News host and co. weren’t going to throw them under the bus
Reposted by Isonzeando
Ojalá no encuentre camareros jamás, tenga que cerrar su negocio y sea ella a la que le toque trabajar en el negocio de otro con las condiciones que ella exige.
December 1, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Ojalá no encuentre camareros jamás, tenga que cerrar su negocio y sea ella a la que le toque trabajar en el negocio de otro con las condiciones que ella exige.
Reposted by Isonzeando
Un alumno de Lladós se va de inmigrante ilegal a EEUU, porque con echarle huevos y hacer burpees basta para tener exito, y descubre lo dura que es la vida de un sin papeles.
Dura 1h pero es HIPNÓTICO.
Dura 1h pero es HIPNÓTICO.
Cómo empecé de 0 como inmigrante en Miami (SIN FILTROS)
YouTube video by SAIZARFITNESS
youtu.be
December 1, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Un alumno de Lladós se va de inmigrante ilegal a EEUU, porque con echarle huevos y hacer burpees basta para tener exito, y descubre lo dura que es la vida de un sin papeles.
Dura 1h pero es HIPNÓTICO.
Dura 1h pero es HIPNÓTICO.
Reposted by Isonzeando
November 30, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Reposted by Isonzeando
I know we’ve moved on 781 times by now, but…
I still can’t believe he tore down half the White House
I still can’t believe he tore down half the White House
December 1, 2025 at 3:46 AM
I know we’ve moved on 781 times by now, but…
I still can’t believe he tore down half the White House
I still can’t believe he tore down half the White House
Reposted by Isonzeando
Es la ley electoral que tenemos y esto pasa por ir separados, así de simple.
Vox duplica en votos a Sumar y Podemos pero obtiene 5 veces más escaños,
por @miguelmunozort.bsky.social
publico.es/politica/gob...
Lo dicen todas las encuestas: es pura matemática la victoria o la derrota de las (ultra)derechas, en función de lo que haga la izquierda y si es capaz de entusiasmar.
por @miguelmunozort.bsky.social
publico.es/politica/gob...
Lo dicen todas las encuestas: es pura matemática la victoria o la derrota de las (ultra)derechas, en función de lo que haga la izquierda y si es capaz de entusiasmar.
La letra pequeña de las encuestas: Vox duplica en votos a Sumar y Podemos pero obtiene cinco veces más escaños
'Público' recopila las reflexiones de Moncloa, algunos de sus socios y de expertos sobre la dispersión del voto, las posibles candidaturas unitarias y otros asuntos demoscópicos....
publico.es
December 1, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Es la ley electoral que tenemos y esto pasa por ir separados, así de simple.
Reposted by Isonzeando
ahhhh
December 1, 2025 at 6:30 AM
ahhhh
Reposted by Isonzeando
Jesucristo del motocross.
AI people are so fucking dumb they made a response to that post using homelander jesus christ it should be illegal to be this dumb
December 1, 2025 at 10:10 AM
Jesucristo del motocross.
Reposted by Isonzeando
Me gusta mucho el Mass Effect pero mi corazón siempre ha sido del Dragon Age y estoy muy triste y muy hasta los putos cojones de la puta EA de mierda allá se pudra ella y todo lo que representa
December 1, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Me gusta mucho el Mass Effect pero mi corazón siempre ha sido del Dragon Age y estoy muy triste y muy hasta los putos cojones de la puta EA de mierda allá se pudra ella y todo lo que representa
Reposted by Isonzeando
AI people are so fucking dumb they made a response to that post using homelander jesus christ it should be illegal to be this dumb
December 1, 2025 at 9:19 AM
AI people are so fucking dumb they made a response to that post using homelander jesus christ it should be illegal to be this dumb