Irene Hames
banner
irenehames.bsky.social
Irene Hames
@irenehames.bsky.social
Retired journal editor, still interested in seeing the highest standards maintained in research integrity, research publication, peer review and publication ethics. Book on peer review.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-8786
Pinned
Fake peer review: @retractionwatch.com has lots of examples, COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) has guidance on helping recognise it and features/patterns of questionable reviewer activity
publicationethics.org/resources/fl...

#PeerReview #PublicationEthics #FakePeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process
How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process.
publicationethics.org
Excellent post, many important points made, including

“… credit is the engine of the system. Without it, data sharing becomes either altruism or compliance. And compliance has a predictable failure mode: it optimises for the minimum required output.”
The institutions that embrace machine-first FAIR will find themselves having more impact for their research and researchers.

More reuse. More trust. More interoperability.

Value, not volume.

www.digital-science.com/blog/2026/02...
Value over Volume: The Next Ten Years of Open Data - Digital Science
Mark Hahnel shares the open data wins of the past decade, the challenges, and the future of data sharing.
www.digital-science.com
February 4, 2026 at 10:31 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
I wrote a blog for the Meta-Research Center expressing my infinite frustration about not getting data. What else is new, you might think? Well, I added an extra layer of annoyance directed at the journals who do NOTHING to enforce promised data sharing.

metaresearch.nl/blog/2026/2/...
Promised Data Unavailable? – I’m Sorry, Ma’am, There’s Nothing We Can Do — Meta-Research Center
This blogpost has been written by Michèle Nuijten. Michèle is an assistant professor of our research group who investigates reproducibility and replicability in psychology. Also, she is the developer ...
metaresearch.nl
February 3, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
'to treat peer review as a throughput problem is to misunderstand what is at stake. Review is not simply a production stage in the research pipeline; it is one of the few remaining spaces where the scientific community talks to itself.' 1/3
AI is not a peer, so it can’t do peer review
If we still believe that science is a vocation grounded in argument, curiosity and care, we can’t delegate judgement to machines, says Akhil Bhardwaj
www.timeshighereducation.com
February 3, 2026 at 8:17 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
The Peptide Craze
The Surge in Use of Off-Label and Non-FDA Approved Peptides
erictopol.substack.com
January 27, 2026 at 5:22 PM
This 💯! Especially important if there is ever a #researchintegrity or #publicationintegrity challenge or investigation
#GenerativeAI issues aside, there is a lesson here about data management and security in research

Institutional data management/information governance tools & policies might be awkward/clunky/old etc - but they exist to provide secure and verified ways to store *all* research data and notes
After turning off ChatGPT’s ‘data consent’ option, Marcel Bucher lost the work behind grant applications, teaching materials and publication drafts

go.nature.com/4qLPpcb
January 23, 2026 at 11:58 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
This is a fantastic conference for anyone involved in research and/or its communication #R2RConf
#R2RConf Participant numbers for 24-25 February in London are booming, with registrations about 15% higher than this time in 2025 and 2024. But some tickets are still available.
r2rconf.com/r2r-conferen...
January 22, 2026 at 11:09 AM
My PI is not offering any support or guidance on my PhD project, what should I do?

#PhDchat
My PI is not offering any support or guidance on my PhD project, what should I do?
A safety engineer feels abandoned by their principal investigator. How should they find support?
www.nature.com
January 22, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
I've just updated my preprint on short personal reviews of novels on #ResearchIntegrity , which now covers 35 titles. bit.ly/409E5ff
Please attend me to novels which you believe to belong to this list, but are not yet included.
January 14, 2026 at 7:25 AM
Welcome back!

#ResearchIntegrity
After a period of inactivity, we are reactivating this account as a primary channel for connecting with the research community.

We'll be sharing new outputs, our latest guidance, and commentary on all things research integrity. Give us a follow and join the conversation💬
January 18, 2026 at 1:27 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
History is a great teacher.

In this piece our own @heidiledford.bsky.social looks at what we can learn from what happened in Japan when vaccine support was withdrawn and how the government is now working to reverse the effects 🧪
#MedSky

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
How do vaccine cutbacks affect public health? Ask Japan
As Robert F. Kennedy Jr slashes the US childhood vaccine roster, Japan is racing to make up for lost ground after decades of setbacks.
www.nature.com
January 18, 2026 at 9:04 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
I used to blog my reading of papers on #ResearchIntegrity training and here's my little inexpert grumble (as a practitioner) about people who write about Research Integrity training (or possibly any sort of training!) researchintegritytraining.wordpress.com/2022/02/02/1...
15 requests for anyone researching Research Integrity training
I have been blogging my reading of research papers on Research Integrity training since 2020. I would file this area of research under “Education”, a social science, so it is important …
researchintegritytraining.wordpress.com
January 9, 2026 at 8:34 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
I really admire the work of this team, on an ongoing basis. They provide numbers and evidence for research integrity concerns that we have been seeing for quite a few years. And so many academics seem to prefer to ignore the issues and continue to support predatory-like publishing. 👏⬇️
We've got ISSUES. Literally.

We scraped >100k special issues & over 1 million articles to bring you a PISS-poor paper. We quantify just how many excess papers are published by guest editors abusing special issues to boost their CVs. How bad is it & what can we do?

arxiv.org/abs/2601.07563

A 🧵 1/n
January 15, 2026 at 2:33 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
If you've ever wondered about the infrastructure behind the Internet Archive and the Wayback Machine, check out this teardown ➡️ hackernoon.com/the-long-now...
January 13, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Endogeny: the practice of a guest editor publishing a non-editorial article in their own special issue

Important ‘special issue endogeny’ dataset of >100,000 guest-edited collections with nearly 1 million papers has been created and analysed, with some jaw-dropping results 1/2
#PublicationIntegrity
The Issue with Special Issues: when Guest Editors Publish in Support of Self
The recent exceptional growth in the number of special issues has led to the largest delegation of editorial power in the history of scientific publishing. Has this power been used responsibly? In thi...
arxiv.org
January 13, 2026 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
🎉 Today is the birthday of Professor Archibald Cochrane, a Scottish medical researcher who greatly influenced the development of epidemiology, the study of how often diseases occur in different groups of people and why.

Find out more about him and the development of our logo here👇
Our name and logo | Cochrane
Archie Cochrane and the meaning behind our logo
www.cochrane.org
January 12, 2026 at 12:01 PM
Very good essay

@profcarlrhodes.bsky.social & Martina Linnenluecke describe a set of overlapping trends in academic research publication reinforcing one another to create “a downward spiral into junkification”

#AcademicPublication #AcademicPublishing #PublicationIntegrity #ResearchIntegrity
The junkification of research - Carl Rhodes, Martina K Linnenluecke, 2025
This essay considers the emergent phenomenon of ‘junkification’ in academic research publishing. The term junkification was originally coined to describe the in...
doi.org
January 11, 2026 at 2:14 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
New Year, new #Bluesky user?
Interested in #ResearchIntegrity & looking to connect with others on @bsky.app?

Here are two #StarterPacks covering people connected with research integrity & there's still space so please share suggestions or wave to be added!

go.bsky.app/QN5upY5

go.bsky.app/5NJ9Z4N
January 7, 2026 at 11:14 AM
Reposted by Irene Hames
Weekend reads: Evaluating the benefits of open science, a misconduct investigation in Korea, and what we lose in outsourcing reviews to AI
Weekend reads: Evaluating the benefits of open science, a misconduct investigation in Korea, and what we lose in outsourcing reviews to AI
Happy 2026! We’re excited to bring you the first Weekend Reads of the new year.   The week at Retraction Watch featured: The BMJ retracts clinical trial for ‘severe’ discrepancies in rand…
retractionwatch.com
January 3, 2026 at 2:17 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
A tape measure, a metal detector and a spirit level: 25 surprisingly useful things you can do with your phone
A tape measure, a metal detector and a spirit level: 25 surprisingly useful things you can do with your phone
While many use our phones predominantly to doomscroll, smartphones have a range of little-known functions that could make life better and easier – from heart monitoring to even developing camera film
www.theguardian.com
December 21, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Reposted by Irene Hames
Writing is thinking - a short but memorable thread.
I've spent all day struggling to write a single page of a popular science article. I bang away at a word processor; give up; start diagramming on paper. Take some notes; draft a few sentences in pen; return to the computer...and very slowly I figure out what I was trying to say in the first place.
December 17, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Fascinating article from @uk.theconversation.com on how ‘words of the year’ are chosen!
Slop, vibe coding and glazing: AI dominates 2025’s words of the year
Significant time is spent on tracking the usage of words throughout the year before making decisions on contenders.
theconversation.com
December 17, 2025 at 11:13 AM
#PublicGoodCuration an important concept. This guide from @senseaboutsci.bsky.social & @sagepub.com an important step in developing a framework to help not just the public but other specialists and curators distinguish reliable information from the rising tide of misinformation & disinformation.
Celebrating Public-Good Curators: An Interview with Tracey Brown and Camille Gamboa - The Scholarly Kitchen
Who are public-good curators and how can they help improve public trust in science? Learn more in this interview with Tracey Brown (Sense about Science) and Camille Gamboa (Sage) about their recently ...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
December 16, 2025 at 1:33 PM