BSF 🐀🇬🇧
@bsf42069.bsky.social
My enemies are many, my equals are none
Calling me a troll when I’ve made a valid argument doesn’t make me a troll. Grow up
Calling me a troll when I’ve made a valid argument doesn’t make me a troll. Grow up
Reposted by BSF 🐀🇬🇧
Going to the moon has never been, and never will be, 'safe'. It's all just a matter of managed known risks.
January 24, 2026 at 10:29 AM
Going to the moon has never been, and never will be, 'safe'. It's all just a matter of managed known risks.
This article is incredibly flawed. Firstly, the decision to not change the shield and instead modify trajectory was done by extensive ground testing (including 10 minute arc tests, modelling, worst case scenario investigations into damage tolerance and balancing risks that design changes add
Oh cool, NASA is launching a manned moon orbit mission with the full knowledge that the heat shield has issues. Multiple previous astronauts and experts are calling it "crazy". What could go wrong
NASA is about to send people to the moon — in a spacecraft not everyone thinks is safe to fly | CNN
As the four-person crew of Artemis II prepares to launch on a historic mission around the moon as soon as February, some experts are worried about the Orion spacecraft’s heat shield.
share.google
January 25, 2026 at 11:06 PM
This article is incredibly flawed. Firstly, the decision to not change the shield and instead modify trajectory was done by extensive ground testing (including 10 minute arc tests, modelling, worst case scenario investigations into damage tolerance and balancing risks that design changes add
Whataboutism that’s not even remotely true
January 3, 2026 at 12:21 PM
Whataboutism that’s not even remotely true
Worried about them NOW? Buddy. They’re fucking happy
I worry about people in Venezuela, and about what it means for all of us for the world’s largest military power to go fully rogue
January 3, 2026 at 12:18 PM
Worried about them NOW? Buddy. They’re fucking happy
This article is flawed from the outset. It’s falsely claiming the CRASH clock is saying how long spacecraft HAVE to avoid collisions when in actuality the model shows how long until a collision would happen if ALL collision avoidance systems suddenly stopped working
Before satellite mega-constellations began taking off in 2019, satellites used to go months without risking a collision in orbit.
Now they have less than a week to take evasive maneuvers, and the window keeps shrinking. My @sciam.bsky.social story below.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sate...
Now they have less than a week to take evasive maneuvers, and the window keeps shrinking. My @sciam.bsky.social story below.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sate...
Satellites Used to Have Months to Avoid Collisions—Now They Have Days
In the era of mega constellations, spacecraft typically have less than a week to avoid crashes
www.scientificamerican.com
December 19, 2025 at 12:41 PM
This article is flawed from the outset. It’s falsely claiming the CRASH clock is saying how long spacecraft HAVE to avoid collisions when in actuality the model shows how long until a collision would happen if ALL collision avoidance systems suddenly stopped working
This is revisionist. The S-V and Shuttle did not belong to all Americans. They were built by private companies and owned by the government
Claiming that the Saturn V existed for anything other than a literal vanity project is also insanely ignorant to it’s history
Claiming that the Saturn V existed for anything other than a literal vanity project is also insanely ignorant to it’s history
It's not the biggest tragedy of our era, but the dismantling of NASA in favor of contracting with billionaires' vanity space companies is really painful.
Saturn V and the Space Shuttle belonged to all of us. Now our major space launch vehicle was tested by launching a Tesla into orbit for lulz.
Saturn V and the Space Shuttle belonged to all of us. Now our major space launch vehicle was tested by launching a Tesla into orbit for lulz.
November 13, 2025 at 11:47 PM
This is revisionist. The S-V and Shuttle did not belong to all Americans. They were built by private companies and owned by the government
Claiming that the Saturn V existed for anything other than a literal vanity project is also insanely ignorant to it’s history
Claiming that the Saturn V existed for anything other than a literal vanity project is also insanely ignorant to it’s history
Reposted by BSF 🐀🇬🇧
NEVER
TELL
ME
THE
ODDS
TELL
ME
THE
ODDS
November 13, 2025 at 9:05 PM
NEVER
TELL
ME
THE
ODDS
TELL
ME
THE
ODDS
Ah yes. Because the plane model is definitely the issue here
Guess the model of the plane.
A United Airlines jet's windscreen was cracked while flying at 36,000 feet, and images appeared to show the captain's forearm was cut.
October 20, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Ah yes. Because the plane model is definitely the issue here
SpaceX’s little success btw
October 14, 2025 at 1:26 AM
SpaceX’s little success btw
“Constantly falling out of the sky”
It’s one on average a day. One. On planned deorbits where they fully demise
Alarmist headlines like this do nothing but erode people’s understanding of the world as it actually is
It’s one on average a day. One. On planned deorbits where they fully demise
Alarmist headlines like this do nothing but erode people’s understanding of the world as it actually is
October 9, 2025 at 2:49 PM
“Constantly falling out of the sky”
It’s one on average a day. One. On planned deorbits where they fully demise
Alarmist headlines like this do nothing but erode people’s understanding of the world as it actually is
It’s one on average a day. One. On planned deorbits where they fully demise
Alarmist headlines like this do nothing but erode people’s understanding of the world as it actually is
Reposted by BSF 🐀🇬🇧
look you can hate musk for other reasons but this whole article is riddled with biased language, bad sources. incredibly bad hit piece right from the get go.
that dude Loverro mentioned 7 times in this piece is corrupt.
here's a point by point rebuttal by a former NASA guy.
x.com/CJHandmer/st...
that dude Loverro mentioned 7 times in this piece is corrupt.
here's a point by point rebuttal by a former NASA guy.
x.com/CJHandmer/st...
September 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM
look you can hate musk for other reasons but this whole article is riddled with biased language, bad sources. incredibly bad hit piece right from the get go.
that dude Loverro mentioned 7 times in this piece is corrupt.
here's a point by point rebuttal by a former NASA guy.
x.com/CJHandmer/st...
that dude Loverro mentioned 7 times in this piece is corrupt.
here's a point by point rebuttal by a former NASA guy.
x.com/CJHandmer/st...
Reposted by BSF 🐀🇬🇧
does Musk overpromise? sure. "Elon time" as many call it. but when it comes to SpaceX even his "late" actual deadlines are far ahead of anyone.
crazy that they're trying to make SpaceX the scapegoat in the public's eyes without going into the details about NASA, Boeing, ULA bureaucracy...
crazy that they're trying to make SpaceX the scapegoat in the public's eyes without going into the details about NASA, Boeing, ULA bureaucracy...
September 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM
does Musk overpromise? sure. "Elon time" as many call it. but when it comes to SpaceX even his "late" actual deadlines are far ahead of anyone.
crazy that they're trying to make SpaceX the scapegoat in the public's eyes without going into the details about NASA, Boeing, ULA bureaucracy...
crazy that they're trying to make SpaceX the scapegoat in the public's eyes without going into the details about NASA, Boeing, ULA bureaucracy...
Dogshit article
NEW: U.S. Is Losing Race to Return to Moon, Critics Say, Pointing at SpaceX
The company’s Starship rocket, which has suffered a series of recent test explosions, is still years away from being ready for the mission, former NASA executives say.
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/u...
The company’s Starship rocket, which has suffered a series of recent test explosions, is still years away from being ready for the mission, former NASA executives say.
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/u...
U.S. Is Losing Race to Return to Moon, Critics Say, Pointing at SpaceX
www.nytimes.com
September 20, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Dogshit article
Be careful what you wish for
September 10, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Be careful what you wish for
The fact people will actually believe this article when the guy gets basic facts wrong is a testament to have dead truth is
September 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM
The fact people will actually believe this article when the guy gets basic facts wrong is a testament to have dead truth is
No actually
China won the second that NASA went for the SpaceX bid
September 4, 2025 at 2:27 PM
No actually
I feel obligated to address the literal horsehit in this article so let’s go:
Nobody knows if SpaceX's approach will eventually pay off.
SpaceX Is Losing a Staggering Amount of Money Every Time One of Its Starships Explodes
Each of SpaceX's enormous Starship explosions is costing the private space company an enormous amount of money.
trib.al
August 23, 2025 at 3:23 PM
I feel obligated to address the literal horsehit in this article so let’s go:
NASA receives billions in federal funding yet pays no federal taxes
August 15, 2025 at 12:19 PM
NASA receives billions in federal funding yet pays no federal taxes
Bros best argument is because of a decades old launch failure of an older model
For the sake of those on this planet, don't send up nuclear fuel rods with SpaceX
August 8, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Bros best argument is because of a decades old launch failure of an older model
It scrubbed because of the weather. Nice try to spread disinformation tho.
July 31, 2025 at 8:40 PM
It scrubbed because of the weather. Nice try to spread disinformation tho.
“I know it’s hard or whatever but shouldn’t it just be easy? I, in my completely uninformed and unaware mindset thought it was easy so why isn’t it?”
Rockets
Are
✨Hard✨
They don’t become easy because someone else somewhere figured it out on a different system lmfaoo
Rockets
Are
✨Hard✨
They don’t become easy because someone else somewhere figured it out on a different system lmfaoo
July 30, 2025 at 8:25 PM
“I know it’s hard or whatever but shouldn’t it just be easy? I, in my completely uninformed and unaware mindset thought it was easy so why isn’t it?”
Rockets
Are
✨Hard✨
They don’t become easy because someone else somewhere figured it out on a different system lmfaoo
Rockets
Are
✨Hard✨
They don’t become easy because someone else somewhere figured it out on a different system lmfaoo
“That’s why NASA tests on the ground”
SO SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT!!!
If only they didn’t have such obvious double standards
SO SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT!!!
If only they didn’t have such obvious double standards
June 27, 2025 at 10:08 PM
“That’s why NASA tests on the ground”
SO SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT!!!
If only they didn’t have such obvious double standards
SO SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT!!!
If only they didn’t have such obvious double standards
Funny, I’m noticing a distinct lack of doomering and mockery after the BOLE test today.
June 27, 2025 at 8:31 AM
Funny, I’m noticing a distinct lack of doomering and mockery after the BOLE test today.