Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
banner
bryanculbertson.com
Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
@bryanculbertson.com
he/him

Living the car-free life in Oakland, CA. Don't make me drive.

https://mastodon.social/@bryanculbertson
Pinned
ICE will continue to murder us until we abolish them
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Median driver in 2026.
yeah I got a question: what the fuck?
February 10, 2026 at 5:32 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Check out all the speed limit reductions Emeryville staff brought to their council transportation committee today!
February 10, 2026 at 11:25 PM
I would have thought so too from my experience, but perhaps we just aren't noticing since people pay at stations?
February 11, 2026 at 2:30 AM
Buses are low cost to operate per-hour or per-mile, they are just not as efficient per-passenger because they carry fewer passenger per-vehicle than trains

When demand is high enough to fill a train it becomes efficient to upgrade to rail
February 11, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Thanks for clarifying!
February 11, 2026 at 12:09 AM
Yep, Tempo ranges from 15k to 17.5k per-day

public.tableau.com/app/profile/...
February 10, 2026 at 11:29 PM
Tempo has basically the same farebox recovery rate (8.3%) as the rest of the AC Transit service (8.5%)

Which is higher than most bay area bus services like SFMTA (7.6%) and VTA (7.3%)
February 10, 2026 at 11:21 PM
Haha, which reminds me, I need to clarify these charts are operating cost to the transit operator, not cost to the rider, and clarify which direction is better
February 10, 2026 at 11:02 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Bus rapid transit on San Pablo Avenue from Oakland to Richmond (and beyond) would be a game changer.

So many folks would replace car trips with bus trips, and BRT would support the housing and commercial development that's happening up and down San Pablo.

Let's approve, fund it and make it happen!
One single local BRT line in Oakland (AC Transit Tempo) serves more riders than the entire VTA Light Rail system, and has a Cost Effectiveness that rivals our top *regional* transit services

Bay Area should be super-funding East Bay BRT if they distributed funding based on objective metrics
February 10, 2026 at 9:57 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
CDMX has electric regional rail every 5-7 minutes but SoCal can't electrify the Surfliner? Get it together, California!
So much new passenger rail going on in Mexico these days (compared to prior decades). On February 2nd, the El Insurgente line (previously known as Tren Interurbano) extended 8.4 km to connect with the Mexico City Metro Line 1 at Observatorio station. It uses CAF EMUs in serving 57 km to Toluca.
El Insurgente creates an interchanage with Mexico City’s metro
MEXICO: The El Insurgente suburban rail service in Mexico City has been extended from Santa Fe to Observatorio, where meets metro Line 1.
www.railwaygazette.com
February 10, 2026 at 6:56 PM
4. Do you have corrective maintenance tracked by month for the last couple years like other metrics reported in the Quarterly Performance Reports: www.bart.gov/about/reports
Reports | Bay Area Rapid Transit
www.bart.gov
February 10, 2026 at 9:45 PM
Can you provide details about this, like:
1. What is "corrective maintenance"? What are examples of tasks? Does repairing the gates themselves count?
2. What is the timeframe? Some gates haven't been installed for 6mo yet
3. How many hours of maintenance overall? Is 961 hours 1% or 10%?
February 10, 2026 at 9:30 PM
Not trying to bash VTA Light Rail here, just trying to use an comparison for how much ridership Tempo has

Another comparisons, Tempo BRT has more ridership than all the Ferries, and more ridership than the Cable Cars!
February 10, 2026 at 8:18 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Listen to this. Not a penny more for this. Abolish and prosecute anyone who had anything to do with it.
"A modern-day concentration camp ... People have been killed by the staff here." Irish citizen Seamus Culleton has been in ICE detention since September, despite having a valid work permit and his own business in the US.
February 10, 2026 at 3:41 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Ring is a wildly dangerous company. Always has been. But it has sort of flown under the radar the last couple years as it tried to soften its image. Make no mistake that this is an extremely dangerous surveillance dragnet:

www.404media.co/with-ring-am...
With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet
Ring's 'Search Party' is dystopian surveillance accelerationism.
www.404media.co
February 10, 2026 at 3:09 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
Absolutely damning study documenting the rate of drivers breaking the law

"extrapolated, the data projects a staggering 200,000 daily violations at just these intersections"

Confirms what everyone has experienced since Covid. All it took was to set up cameras and document it
#safestreets #bikesky
Colorado driver behavior study captures alarming habits
YouTube video by CBS Colorado
youtu.be
February 9, 2026 at 5:10 PM
And it isn't just the low ridership, regular BART and AC Transt buses with human operators are lower cost than the automated OAK Airport Connector

The route was better as a human operated bus
February 10, 2026 at 2:38 AM
I was most impressed with the high ridership

I don't think Tempo gets the regional recognition that other systems do when they have more ridership than systems with significantly more funding
February 10, 2026 at 2:02 AM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
In 2014, New York City lowered its citywide default speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph. In the year that followed:

- Traffic fatalities fell by more than 22 percent

- Pedestrian fatalities fell by more than 25 percent

transalt.org/reports-list...
Also, most car crashes occur at intersections, and not because a car was exceeding the speed.

My bet is that even if you made it so no one could speed anywhere, it would only marginally lower traffic fatalities.
February 9, 2026 at 6:40 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
We need Tempo lines all around the Bay!!
One single local BRT line in Oakland (AC Transit Tempo) serves more riders than the entire VTA Light Rail system, and has a Cost Effectiveness that rivals our top *regional* transit services

Bay Area should be super-funding East Bay BRT if they distributed funding based on objective metrics
February 9, 2026 at 11:01 PM
Tempo alone serves more riders then all ferry service in the bay area combined!
February 9, 2026 at 10:31 PM
2024 FTA NTD - Bay Area
docs.google.com
February 9, 2026 at 10:26 PM
One single local BRT line in Oakland (AC Transit Tempo) serves more riders than the entire VTA Light Rail system, and has a Cost Effectiveness that rivals our top *regional* transit services

Bay Area should be super-funding East Bay BRT if they distributed funding based on objective metrics
February 9, 2026 at 10:25 PM
Reposted by Bryan Culbertson πŸ₯„
I love the ferries but these zero-information op-eds are dangerous & frustrating. Ferries will only ever serve a very small % of potential rail/bus passengers & they’re among the most subsidized transit systems.

www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/arti...
February 9, 2026 at 4:19 PM
Average cost/passenger-mi for ferry service in the US is $2.33/pmt, so SF Ferry having $1.71/pmt is an example of your great success at attracting passengers and keeping costs low!
February 9, 2026 at 9:31 PM