Rich Aixill
@badgerthecat.bsky.social
#NAFO
I support Ukraine 100%
#FELLA
#ANTIFA
#FBR ๐
Ex-Infantry Section Commander
(I was trained to fight Russians from the age of 16)
Appreciates 70s soul music & intelligent company
Post Grad Certificate Security Studies
Independent (Left) voter
I support Ukraine 100%
#FELLA
#ANTIFA
#FBR ๐
Ex-Infantry Section Commander
(I was trained to fight Russians from the age of 16)
Appreciates 70s soul music & intelligent company
Post Grad Certificate Security Studies
Independent (Left) voter
Pinned
Rich Aixill
@badgerthecat.bsky.social
ยท Jan 8
Please share this with people you think should be aware.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Happy Birthday for tomorrow Debs x
February 10, 2026 at 8:14 PM
Happy Birthday for tomorrow Debs x
Reposted by Rich Aixill
If @Harvard University is serious about severing ties with late serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein once and for all, it would cut ties with this Epstein enabler. Please share if you agree! share.weareultraviolet.org/s/YQZw1qEk
The public knows Alan Dershowitz is a dirtbag. Harvard keeps inviting him.
share.weareultraviolet.org
February 10, 2026 at 6:14 PM
If @Harvard University is serious about severing ties with late serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein once and for all, it would cut ties with this Epstein enabler. Please share if you agree! share.weareultraviolet.org/s/YQZw1qEk
All of which should undergo the appropriate vetting in mine & many other peoples opinion -as we did!
A select few do I understand (although exactly who is not officially disclosed).
However, the current system, based on historic practice, isn't fit for purpose.
As the current news story illustrates.
A select few do I understand (although exactly who is not officially disclosed).
However, the current system, based on historic practice, isn't fit for purpose.
As the current news story illustrates.
February 10, 2026 at 5:57 PM
All of which should undergo the appropriate vetting in mine & many other peoples opinion -as we did!
A select few do I understand (although exactly who is not officially disclosed).
However, the current system, based on historic practice, isn't fit for purpose.
As the current news story illustrates.
A select few do I understand (although exactly who is not officially disclosed).
However, the current system, based on historic practice, isn't fit for purpose.
As the current news story illustrates.
I said 'many politicians' do Vetting, you said 'no politician gets vetted', I wonder if we could agree on 'some'?
I was thinking of certain roles that do require it, such as Int & Sec Committee (which the IfG report notes) as well as some others.
Regardless, I agree the process needs improvement.
I was thinking of certain roles that do require it, such as Int & Sec Committee (which the IfG report notes) as well as some others.
Regardless, I agree the process needs improvement.
February 10, 2026 at 5:24 PM
I said 'many politicians' do Vetting, you said 'no politician gets vetted', I wonder if we could agree on 'some'?
I was thinking of certain roles that do require it, such as Int & Sec Committee (which the IfG report notes) as well as some others.
Regardless, I agree the process needs improvement.
I was thinking of certain roles that do require it, such as Int & Sec Committee (which the IfG report notes) as well as some others.
Regardless, I agree the process needs improvement.
"Don't tell him Pike!"
February 10, 2026 at 3:09 PM
"Don't tell him Pike!"
No offence taken ๐
February 10, 2026 at 3:07 PM
No offence taken ๐
I can't add a comment Arthur -hence this rude introduction for which I apologise.
Was your helpful piece written based off your own experience, as there have been updates since I believe?
E.G., many politicians do get SC/DV vetted (role dependant) & there is a Security Service check element in SC/DV
Was your helpful piece written based off your own experience, as there have been updates since I believe?
E.G., many politicians do get SC/DV vetted (role dependant) & there is a Security Service check element in SC/DV
A fair amount of nonsense has been written and said about the "security vetting" process for Mandelson's appointment. I wrote about what "Developed Vetting" really involves and why it's perfectly possible that it found nothing useful about Mandelson.
arthursnell.substack.com/p/the-vettin...
arthursnell.substack.com/p/the-vettin...
The Vetting Myth
Understanding the realities of Mandelson's pre-appointment checks
arthursnell.substack.com
February 10, 2026 at 3:05 PM
I can't add a comment Arthur -hence this rude introduction for which I apologise.
Was your helpful piece written based off your own experience, as there have been updates since I believe?
E.G., many politicians do get SC/DV vetted (role dependant) & there is a Security Service check element in SC/DV
Was your helpful piece written based off your own experience, as there have been updates since I believe?
E.G., many politicians do get SC/DV vetted (role dependant) & there is a Security Service check element in SC/DV
Excellent recovery by doggo by that gate ๐
February 10, 2026 at 2:42 PM
Excellent recovery by doggo by that gate ๐
One dude in the bob - *Finally -yes!*
February 10, 2026 at 1:34 PM
One dude in the bob - *Finally -yes!*
All true Bob.
I ran out of room for those and I could have added:
Bully, Egocentric, Manipulative, Cruel, Jealous, Arrogant
etc etc ๐
I ran out of room for those and I could have added:
Bully, Egocentric, Manipulative, Cruel, Jealous, Arrogant
etc etc ๐
February 10, 2026 at 1:13 AM
All true Bob.
I ran out of room for those and I could have added:
Bully, Egocentric, Manipulative, Cruel, Jealous, Arrogant
etc etc ๐
I ran out of room for those and I could have added:
Bully, Egocentric, Manipulative, Cruel, Jealous, Arrogant
etc etc ๐
Hillary was right - they ARE deplorables.
They know this to be true. In Trump they see something of themselves.
A racist, a liar, a criminal, a sex offender, a thief, a misogynist, a braggart, a coward, a conman, a grifter and an adulterer.
Trump is all things to all bad people. He is one of them.
They know this to be true. In Trump they see something of themselves.
A racist, a liar, a criminal, a sex offender, a thief, a misogynist, a braggart, a coward, a conman, a grifter and an adulterer.
Trump is all things to all bad people. He is one of them.
February 10, 2026 at 12:34 AM
Hillary was right - they ARE deplorables.
They know this to be true. In Trump they see something of themselves.
A racist, a liar, a criminal, a sex offender, a thief, a misogynist, a braggart, a coward, a conman, a grifter and an adulterer.
Trump is all things to all bad people. He is one of them.
They know this to be true. In Trump they see something of themselves.
A racist, a liar, a criminal, a sex offender, a thief, a misogynist, a braggart, a coward, a conman, a grifter and an adulterer.
Trump is all things to all bad people. He is one of them.
1) - hard disagree. My Sister was an talented amateur figure ice skater. She trained very hard, was very fit & it took a lot of skill and effort. And the risk of injury was very high.
However, if you had said the same about the dudes that go down an ice track on a tea tray (Luge) - possible agree.
However, if you had said the same about the dudes that go down an ice track on a tea tray (Luge) - possible agree.
February 9, 2026 at 9:48 PM
1) - hard disagree. My Sister was an talented amateur figure ice skater. She trained very hard, was very fit & it took a lot of skill and effort. And the risk of injury was very high.
However, if you had said the same about the dudes that go down an ice track on a tea tray (Luge) - possible agree.
However, if you had said the same about the dudes that go down an ice track on a tea tray (Luge) - possible agree.
Reposted by Rich Aixill
We all know big corporations have too much influence in Washington. I've never taken a dime of corporate PAC money because Arizonans need to know their elected leaders are working for them. We need to put people first and get corporate money out of politics.
February 9, 2026 at 9:18 PM
We all know big corporations have too much influence in Washington. I've never taken a dime of corporate PAC money because Arizonans need to know their elected leaders are working for them. We need to put people first and get corporate money out of politics.
Reposted by Rich Aixill
โThere is a picture of Vladimir Putin in the Palm Room of the White House.
Imagine Churchill posting a picture of Hitler in 10 Downing Street.โ
Admiral Mike Franken
Imagine Churchill posting a picture of Hitler in 10 Downing Street.โ
Admiral Mike Franken
February 9, 2026 at 9:19 PM
โThere is a picture of Vladimir Putin in the Palm Room of the White House.
Imagine Churchill posting a picture of Hitler in 10 Downing Street.โ
Admiral Mike Franken
Imagine Churchill posting a picture of Hitler in 10 Downing Street.โ
Admiral Mike Franken
What werido she is!
February 9, 2026 at 9:03 PM
What werido she is!
Daily Express are the Al-Qaeda arm of the Tories. Ignore.
February 9, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Daily Express are the Al-Qaeda arm of the Tories. Ignore.
Peter - what the hell are they playing about at here JFC!
February 9, 2026 at 6:55 PM
Peter - what the hell are they playing about at here JFC!
Agreed - I would try and avoid if possible. Hope you're not in too much pain buddy?
February 9, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Agreed - I would try and avoid if possible. Hope you're not in too much pain buddy?
What a vile f'ing b*tch
February 9, 2026 at 2:37 PM
What a vile f'ing b*tch
I trust the US Admin as much as I trust Putin - I don't.
February 9, 2026 at 2:34 PM
I trust the US Admin as much as I trust Putin - I don't.
If they borrow and spend on our Armed Forces I could support that Geoff.
I think quite a few others could too?
I think quite a few others could too?
February 9, 2026 at 1:50 PM
If they borrow and spend on our Armed Forces I could support that Geoff.
I think quite a few others could too?
I think quite a few others could too?
On the plus side - his Niece is quite pretty.
February 9, 2026 at 1:17 PM
On the plus side - his Niece is quite pretty.
I (and others) have been saying that the Strategy & Comms from No.10 has been dire.
So I see these two departures as very positive.
We have a fresh start and the possibility of positive change.
Of course though - if things don't change then we will know where the problem lays & will need to act.
So I see these two departures as very positive.
We have a fresh start and the possibility of positive change.
Of course though - if things don't change then we will know where the problem lays & will need to act.
February 9, 2026 at 1:05 PM
I (and others) have been saying that the Strategy & Comms from No.10 has been dire.
So I see these two departures as very positive.
We have a fresh start and the possibility of positive change.
Of course though - if things don't change then we will know where the problem lays & will need to act.
So I see these two departures as very positive.
We have a fresh start and the possibility of positive change.
Of course though - if things don't change then we will know where the problem lays & will need to act.
Chris Mason is a c**t
A fresh start is welcomed - onwards and upwards!
A fresh start is welcomed - onwards and upwards!
Just in from BBC News:
Chris Mason: Starmer's predicament is dire and now he faces future without top aides
Summary: Sir Keir Starmer's administration appears rudderless after the loss of two key aides, writes...
#Rudderless #Mason #Keir
Agree or disagree?
Chris Mason: Starmer's predicament is dire and now he faces future without top aides
Summary: Sir Keir Starmer's administration appears rudderless after the loss of two key aides, writes...
#Rudderless #Mason #Keir
Agree or disagree?
February 9, 2026 at 12:43 PM
Chris Mason is a c**t
A fresh start is welcomed - onwards and upwards!
A fresh start is welcomed - onwards and upwards!
This is good news sweetheart.
A fresh start hopefully and some new faces and strategy.
A fresh start hopefully and some new faces and strategy.
February 9, 2026 at 12:42 PM
This is good news sweetheart.
A fresh start hopefully and some new faces and strategy.
A fresh start hopefully and some new faces and strategy.