AshlaPike
@ashlapike.bsky.social
She/her
Anti-fascist
Probably Buddhist
Anti-fascist
Probably Buddhist
Pinned
AshlaPike
@ashlapike.bsky.social
· Aug 17
while smiling!
Gavin Newsom literally dressed up in his best Bad Boy™️ attire, invited the press, and smiled as he destroyed everything these constituents had in the world.
Gavin Newsom is not a bad candidate;
Gavin Newsom is truly, at his core, a bad and despicable human being.
Gavin Newsom literally dressed up in his best Bad Boy™️ attire, invited the press, and smiled as he destroyed everything these constituents had in the world.
Gavin Newsom is not a bad candidate;
Gavin Newsom is truly, at his core, a bad and despicable human being.
Newsom is a monster no less evil than Trump. He just wants the power for himself and is willing to manipulate you to get it.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Thanks to @antifapatriot.bsky.social
November 10, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Thanks to @antifapatriot.bsky.social
Reposted by AshlaPike
This is the only way to get them so see sense
November 10, 2025 at 7:56 PM
This is the only way to get them so see sense
She was murdered with a weapon. How would taking her cellphone have helped?
Since Brianna's community online were the ones that supported her, and it was in-person transphobic bullies that stabbed her to death, is the implication here:
"If she wasn't on her phone during school, should wouldn't have decided to be trans."?
Is that what this mother is saying???
"If she wasn't on her phone during school, should wouldn't have decided to be trans."?
Is that what this mother is saying???
Phones did not murder Brianna Ghey in cold blood.
November 11, 2025 at 2:55 AM
She was murdered with a weapon. How would taking her cellphone have helped?
Reposted by AshlaPike
Trans people were just the canary. They're attacking all definitions of femininity and masculinity that do not conform to a rigid, fascist agenda.
Just in case you thought this was about trans athletes. This was solely about creating a fascist and racist gender bureaucracy over what constitutes being feminine enough to be considered a woman.
They're targeting cis women who may be intersex and banning them from sport.
They're targeting cis women who may be intersex and banning them from sport.
November 11, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Trans people were just the canary. They're attacking all definitions of femininity and masculinity that do not conform to a rigid, fascist agenda.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Reposted by AshlaPike
If you believe it was just 8 senators I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. This was a Schumer operation.
November 10, 2025 at 12:33 PM
If you believe it was just 8 senators I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. This was a Schumer operation.
Reposted by AshlaPike
New leadership or
November 10, 2025 at 10:54 PM
New leadership or
Reposted by AshlaPike
Fuck the fuck right off. My employer covered healthcare costs increased by 40% this year and I'm one of the lucky ones.
We're not fighting each other. We're fighting you guys. Have fun with your primaries.
We're not fighting each other. We're fighting you guys. Have fun with your primaries.
But there are real dangers out there that must be fought; and energy spent fighting each other is energy lost to that bigger fight.
November 10, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Fuck the fuck right off. My employer covered healthcare costs increased by 40% this year and I'm one of the lucky ones.
We're not fighting each other. We're fighting you guys. Have fun with your primaries.
We're not fighting each other. We're fighting you guys. Have fun with your primaries.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Reposted by AshlaPike
the purpose of the democratic party is to redirect revolutionary energy into stupid bullshit that doesn't work
November 11, 2025 at 12:28 AM
the purpose of the democratic party is to redirect revolutionary energy into stupid bullshit that doesn't work
Reposted by AshlaPike
Chuck Schumer Helps Pull Democrats Back From Brink Of Courage
November 10, 2025 at 5:02 AM
Chuck Schumer Helps Pull Democrats Back From Brink Of Courage
Reposted by AshlaPike
80% of Democratic voters want a new leader in the Senate.
Does that matter at all to Democratic senators?
Does that matter at all to Democratic senators?
November 10, 2025 at 3:25 AM
80% of Democratic voters want a new leader in the Senate.
Does that matter at all to Democratic senators?
Does that matter at all to Democratic senators?
Reposted by AshlaPike
Reposted by AshlaPike
Reposted by AshlaPike
How did you celebrate anti-communism week?
Lining up at a food bank? Finding out you’d lose access to healthcare? Being unable to afford housing?
Lining up at a food bank? Finding out you’d lose access to healthcare? Being unable to afford housing?
November 10, 2025 at 1:51 AM
How did you celebrate anti-communism week?
Lining up at a food bank? Finding out you’d lose access to healthcare? Being unable to afford housing?
Lining up at a food bank? Finding out you’d lose access to healthcare? Being unable to afford housing?
Reposted by AshlaPike
Truly amazing that any time the democrats have to bite the bullet and do something that ruins countless lives, there's always *just* enough votes to get it done, but if there is a vote on something that would actually improve people's lives, they are always one vote short. Crazy how that happens.
November 10, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Truly amazing that any time the democrats have to bite the bullet and do something that ruins countless lives, there's always *just* enough votes to get it done, but if there is a vote on something that would actually improve people's lives, they are always one vote short. Crazy how that happens.
Reposted by AshlaPike
I received this email about Democrats caving to end the shutdown from one of the SNAP recipients I spoke to:
November 10, 2025 at 2:17 PM
I received this email about Democrats caving to end the shutdown from one of the SNAP recipients I spoke to:
Reposted by AshlaPike
The caucus meeting was just to orchestrate who would fall on the sword but not be up for a vote in 2026.
so currently defectors are:
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
November 10, 2025 at 2:05 AM
The caucus meeting was just to orchestrate who would fall on the sword but not be up for a vote in 2026.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Important to understand this. There's a reasonable chance that your Dem Senator who voted against it and is acting mad now was in on the play. It's the same reason why they scheduled the surrender for AFTER the election this week. They didn't want people pissed at Dems right before an election.
The caucus meeting was just to orchestrate who would fall on the sword but not be up for a vote in 2026.
so currently defectors are:
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
November 10, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Important to understand this. There's a reasonable chance that your Dem Senator who voted against it and is acting mad now was in on the play. It's the same reason why they scheduled the surrender for AFTER the election this week. They didn't want people pissed at Dems right before an election.
Reposted by AshlaPike
This shit is why people don’t trust the Democratic Party.
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
This shit is why people don’t trust the Democratic Party.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Every single Dem that caved and agreed to this deal needs to be primaried and voted out. They are cowards who wasted the last month for a half baked promise vote a month from now.
November 10, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Every single Dem that caved and agreed to this deal needs to be primaried and voted out. They are cowards who wasted the last month for a half baked promise vote a month from now.
Reposted by AshlaPike
Dems have spent the past two months saying they're fighting to address the crisis of spiking healthcare costs and now they're caving for a deal that does nothing to address healthcare costs ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
November 10, 2025 at 12:52 AM
Dems have spent the past two months saying they're fighting to address the crisis of spiking healthcare costs and now they're caving for a deal that does nothing to address healthcare costs ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Reposted by AshlaPike
**Breaking News Headline**
Democrats get rolled...again. Shocking!
Their reason ? Reps wouldn't budge so "it wasn't working." So they gave away SNAP benefits and Obamacare subsidies for millions and got NOTHING for it. And they did it when the public was blaming Reps more.
So over them.
Democrats get rolled...again. Shocking!
Their reason ? Reps wouldn't budge so "it wasn't working." So they gave away SNAP benefits and Obamacare subsidies for millions and got NOTHING for it. And they did it when the public was blaming Reps more.
So over them.
Democrats fold on biggest government shutdown demand
"It's been six weeks," one senator said.
www.axios.com
November 10, 2025 at 11:34 AM
**Breaking News Headline**
Democrats get rolled...again. Shocking!
Their reason ? Reps wouldn't budge so "it wasn't working." So they gave away SNAP benefits and Obamacare subsidies for millions and got NOTHING for it. And they did it when the public was blaming Reps more.
So over them.
Democrats get rolled...again. Shocking!
Their reason ? Reps wouldn't budge so "it wasn't working." So they gave away SNAP benefits and Obamacare subsidies for millions and got NOTHING for it. And they did it when the public was blaming Reps more.
So over them.