Unredacted Epstein files alarm lawmakers

Scholar power: 24.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timothy Snyder	20%	16	24.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

23.7 h

717

24.0%

Ranking score

0.114

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Timothy Snyder

@timothysnyder.bsky.social

Refreshing to see criminal and journalistic investigations go forward in Norway. The scandal is meaningful and there is a meaningful response. All of us should do so well.
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/f...

Two senior Norwegian diplomats being investigated over Epstein links

Financial crimes squad investigate husband and wife in connection to alleged relationship with late sex offender

www.theguardian.com

February 11, 2026 at 2:10 AM

Reposted by Ann Bartow

7%

Scholar power: 7.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ann Bartow	22%	10	7.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

22.2 h

798

7.0%

Ranking score

0.049

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (NM-01)

@repstansbury.bsky.social

This is the FBI’s list of “Prominent Names” it was tracking in the Epstein Case. This list appears in this slide show, FBI email correspondence, and FBI tip sheets — all of which I saw unredacted today. Believe the survivors.

You can see this file on DOJ’s website
www.justice.gov/epstein/file...

February 11, 2026 at 3:39 AM

Reposted by Alex Callinicos

8%

Scholar power: 8.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alex Callinicos	15%	33	8.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

13.0 h

331

8.6%

Ranking score

0.045

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Stefan Homburg

6%

Scholar power: 6.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Stefan Homburg	5%	21	6.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

19.3 h

58

6.9%

Ranking score

0.036

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Rebecca Sear Reposted by Lesley A. Hall, Mel Bartley

16%

Scholar power: 16.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Rebecca Sear	6%	43	11.8%
🎓 Lesley A. Hall	7%	20	3.1%
🎓 Mel Bartley	2%	60	1.5%
Total			16.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

17.2 h

27

16.5%

Ranking score

0.028

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Rebecca Sear

@rebeccasear.bsky.social

“Epstein’s passion for injecting eugenics into conversation after conversation in his emails should shape the way we think about his role in funding scientific research and development—and steering richer men’s money in that world”

Mother Jones @motherjones.com · 1d

Evil men like Epstein are, in the simplest form, obsessed with eugenics because they believe that their ill-gotten gains are the product of some innate superiority.

Epstein couldn't stop emailing people about eugenics

In the latest files, the trafficker gives it a Silicon Valley–pilled name: "genetic altruism."

www.motherjones.com

February 11, 2026 at 8:38 AM

by Andrew Scott

14%

Scholar power: 14.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Andrew Scott	13%	13	14.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

15.7 h

20

14.1%

Ranking score

0.017

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Otto English

@ottoenglish.bsky.social

I've just read a long, long statement... apparently "very few people knew" about Epstein conviction when Chomsky met Epstein in 2015... laughable

February 11, 2026 at 10:07 AM

by Torben Pedersen

2%

Scholar power: 2.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Torben Pedersen	1%	75	2.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

16.6 h

0

2.6%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Fabián Muniesa

10%

Scholar power: 10.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	6%	34	10.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

15.2 h

0

10.5%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

AKA Fa͍ͥ͒ͦͣ͑bi̗̼̣̦̳̊͐̏͊̇aͭn̜͕̜̠̼ͤ̐̏ Munié̼͙̭͉̫̌ͤ̑̓s͚͔̩̓̆a

@provokedeconomy.bsky.social

Nice catch! www.justice.gov/epstein/file...

February 11, 2026 at 10:36 AM

Reposted by François Heisbourg

7%

Scholar power: 7.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 François Heisbourg	22%	12	7.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

18.6 h

3

7.6%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

The Times of Israel

@timesofisrael.com

Trump told police chief in 2006 that ‘everyone’ knew about Epstein, FBI document says https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-told-police-chief-in-2006-that-everyone-knew-about-epstein-fbi-document-says/

Trump told police chief in 2006 that ‘everyone’ knew about Epstein, FBI document says

Report of 2019 interview with Palm Beach police chief says now-president, who repeatedly claimed he knew nothing of Epstein's crimes, said 'thank goodness you're stopping him'

www.timesofisrael.com

February 11, 2026 at 7:16 AM

by Mel Bartley

4%

Scholar power: 4.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mel Bartley	2%	60	4.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

13.9 h

2

4.6%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mel Bartley

@zetkin.bsky.social

I didnt know this but it figures. Too bad some good epidemiologists are going along with the idea.

Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 17h

“Epstein’s passion for injecting eugenics into conversation after conversation in his emails should shape the way we think about his role in funding scientific research and development—and steering richer men’s money in that world”

Mother Jones @motherjones.com · 1d

Evil men like Epstein are, in the simplest form, obsessed with eugenics because they believe that their ill-gotten gains are the product of some innate superiority.

February 11, 2026 at 11:55 AM

Reposted by Helen Clark

1%

Scholar power: 1.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Helen Clark	3%	19	1.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

16.0 h

516

1.3%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Annette Yoshiko Reed

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Annette Yoshiko Reed	3%	19	3.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

12.1 h

17

3.9%

Ranking score

0.009

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Annette Yoshiko Reed

@annetteyreed.bsky.social

“…universities are becoming more reliant on wealthy benefactors. But the networks that fund research and programs can also entangle top universities with morally compromised figures… complicity and compromised institutional integrity.”
www.chronicle.com/article/a-mo...

‘A Moment of Reckoning’: After Epstein, Higher Ed Faces Hard Questions About Its Proximity to Power

Weeks after the release of a new cache of files about Jeffrey Epstein, the fallout on campuses nationwide is coming into focus.

www.chronicle.com

February 11, 2026 at 1:43 PM

by Nathan P. Kalmoe

19%

Scholar power: 19.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Nathan P. Kalmoe	16%	17	19.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

23.5 h

5

19.8%

Ranking score

0.008

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Nathan Kalmoe (he/him)

@nathankalmoe.bsky.social

…which just goes to show how stupid & undeserving they are…

Mother Jones @motherjones.com · 1d

Evil men like Epstein are, in the simplest form, obsessed with eugenics because they believe that their ill-gotten gains are the product of some innate superiority.

Epstein couldn't stop emailing people about eugenics

In the latest files, the trafficker gives it a Silicon Valley–pilled name: "genetic altruism."

www.motherjones.com

February 11, 2026 at 2:21 AM