Epstein files allege staged corpse

Scholar power: 5.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Michael E. Mann	5%	111	5.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

8.0 h

5640

5.3%

Ranking score

0.126

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Michael E. Mann

5%

Scholar power: 5.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Michael E. Mann	5%	111	5.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

9.2 h

531

5.3%

Ranking score

0.043

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Matthew P. McAllister

3%

Scholar power: 3.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Matthew P. McAllister	7%	19	3.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

11.1 h

7667

3.1%

Ranking score

0.079

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

8%

Scholar power: 8.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Branko Milanovic	11%	56	8.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

11.7 h

4

8.2%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Steve Peers, Matthew P. McAllister

18%

Scholar power: 18.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	30%	27	15.6%
🎓 Matthew P. McAllister	7%	19	3.1%
Total			18.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

12.2 h

12446

18.6%

Ranking score

0.366

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Karl Bode

@karlbode.com

Likely-historic photo by NBC News of all the Epstein victims asked to raise their hands if they've not yet been asked to meet with the DOJ as Bondi testifies in foreground

photo of Pam Bondi testifying in the foreground as a group of 7 women and 1 men raise their hands

February 11, 2026 at 5:15 PM

by Matthew P. McAllister

9%

Scholar power: 9.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Matthew P. McAllister	7%	19	9.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

14.5 h

0

9.2%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Matthew P. McAllister

@matthewpmcallister.bsky.social

Two things: (1) Looks like the uber-rich are well aware of critical-theory ideas like hegemony and from The Frankfurt School; (2) I didn't include the actual email to Epstein cause besides being classist it's incredibly racist, too.

February 11, 2026 at 2:55 PM

Die Presse

Epstein-Akten: Justizmitarbeiter wollten Medien mit falscher Leiche ablenken

Um die Leiche von Sexualstraftäter Jeffrey Epstein ungestört abtransportieren zu können, soll mit Kartons und Leintüchern etwas arrangiert worden sein, das wie ein menschlicher Körper aussah.

Reposts 0 15h

by Annette Yoshiko Reed

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Annette Yoshiko Reed	3%	19	3.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

15.7 h

17

3.9%

Ranking score

0.008

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Annette Yoshiko Reed

@annetteyreed.bsky.social

“…universities are becoming more reliant on wealthy benefactors. But the networks that fund research and programs can also entangle top universities with morally compromised figures… complicity and compromised institutional integrity.”
www.chronicle.com/article/a-mo...

‘A Moment of Reckoning’: After Epstein, Higher Ed Faces Hard Questions About Its Proximity to Power

Weeks after the release of a new cache of files about Jeffrey Epstein, the fallout on campuses nationwide is coming into focus.

www.chronicle.com

February 11, 2026 at 1:43 PM

Reposted by Alex Callinicos

8%

Scholar power: 8.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alex Callinicos	15%	33	8.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

16.6 h

331

8.6%

Ranking score

0.035

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Alex Callinicos

8%

Scholar power: 8.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alex Callinicos	15%	33	8.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

17.1 h

230

8.6%

Ranking score

0.029

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Alejandro Gaviría

6%

Scholar power: 6.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alejandro Gaviría	14%	22	6.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

17.4 h

7280

6.6%

Ranking score

0.136

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Mel Bartley

4%

Scholar power: 4.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mel Bartley	2%	60	4.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

17.5 h

2

4.6%

Ranking score

0.008

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mel Bartley

@zetkin.bsky.social

I didnt know this but it figures. Too bad some good epidemiologists are going along with the idea.

Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 20h

“Epstein’s passion for injecting eugenics into conversation after conversation in his emails should shape the way we think about his role in funding scientific research and development—and steering richer men’s money in that world”

Mother Jones @motherjones.com · 1d

Evil men like Epstein are, in the simplest form, obsessed with eugenics because they believe that their ill-gotten gains are the product of some innate superiority.

February 11, 2026 at 11:55 AM

by Fabián Muniesa

10%

Scholar power: 10.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	6%	34	10.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

18.8 h

0

10.5%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

AKA Fa͍ͥ͒ͦͣ͑bi̗̼̣̦̳̊͐̏͊̇aͭn̜͕̜̠̼ͤ̐̏ Munié̼͙̭͉̫̌ͤ̑̓s͚͔̩̓̆a

@provokedeconomy.bsky.social

Nice catch! www.justice.gov/epstein/file...

February 11, 2026 at 10:36 AM

by Andrew Scott

14%

Scholar power: 14.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Andrew Scott	13%	13	14.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

19.3 h

20

14.1%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Otto English

@ottoenglish.bsky.social

I've just read a long, long statement... apparently "very few people knew" about Epstein conviction when Chomsky met Epstein in 2015... laughable

February 11, 2026 at 10:07 AM

Reposted by Helen Clark

1%

Scholar power: 1.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Helen Clark	3%	19	1.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

19.6 h

516

1.3%

Ranking score

0.008

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Torben Pedersen

2%

Scholar power: 2.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Torben Pedersen	1%	75	2.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

20.2 h

0

2.6%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

de Volkskrant

Democraat noemt in parlement zes namen van mogelijke medeplichtigen Epstein

Reposts 0 20h

by Rebecca Sear Reposted by Lesley A. Hall, Mel Bartley

16%

Scholar power: 16.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 40%, Political science 30%, Sociology 15%, Communication & Media Studies 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Rebecca Sear	6%	43	11.8%
🎓 Lesley A. Hall	7%	20	3.1%
🎓 Mel Bartley	2%	60	1.5%
Total			16.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

20.8 h

27

16.5%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Rebecca Sear

@rebeccasear.bsky.social

“Epstein’s passion for injecting eugenics into conversation after conversation in his emails should shape the way we think about his role in funding scientific research and development—and steering richer men’s money in that world”

Mother Jones @motherjones.com · 1d

Evil men like Epstein are, in the simplest form, obsessed with eugenics because they believe that their ill-gotten gains are the product of some innate superiority.