In this new piece I argue that this number is too low for a bunch of reasons.
In this new piece I argue that this number is too low for a bunch of reasons.
www.microgridknowledge.com/microgrids/r...
www.microgridknowledge.com/microgrids/r...
www.theguardian.com/global-devel...
www.theguardian.com/global-devel...
I am a bit leery of the “ok, let’s let ourselves touch the stove” theory, bc I’m afraid of who gets burned. But I find his remarks last year compelling, esp the quote below. www.nytimes.com/2024/09/27/o...
I am a bit leery of the “ok, let’s let ourselves touch the stove” theory, bc I’m afraid of who gets burned. But I find his remarks last year compelling, esp the quote below. www.nytimes.com/2024/09/27/o...
One of the topics at the meeting I attended was GenAI in the classroom.
The most disturbing thing I heard is that the profs think students work in study groups less often now bc they have GenAI to lean on. 😔
One of the topics at the meeting I attended was GenAI in the classroom.
The most disturbing thing I heard is that the profs think students work in study groups less often now bc they have GenAI to lean on. 😔
BEV (up 25%) & PHEV (up 31%) sales surge in 2025 from Jan-Oct, compared to 2024!
Petrol sales plunge 25%.
Diesel sales fall 17%.
#energysky storage.googleapis.com/public_downl...
BEV (up 25%) & PHEV (up 31%) sales surge in 2025 from Jan-Oct, compared to 2024!
Petrol sales plunge 25%.
Diesel sales fall 17%.
#energysky storage.googleapis.com/public_downl...
(I’m a climate nerd, not an election nerd.)
(I’m a climate nerd, not an election nerd.)
What do you think about that argument?
🔌💡
What do you think about that argument?
🔌💡
TL;DR: Permitting reform is hard. We need it. And if it can be done, it will be a compromise. But, like many things, IDK if a responsible compromise is doable rn. 😣 (See below.) 🔌💡
Some thoughts:
I think phrasing permitting proposals as “deregulation” is not right: all the proposals I’ve seen (that I like) are better regulation, not deregulation.
1/
TL;DR: Permitting reform is hard. We need it. And if it can be done, it will be a compromise. But, like many things, IDK if a responsible compromise is doable rn. 😣 (See below.) 🔌💡
Straight from my minister’s sermon today to you: “political grief.” Useful concept. 😔
www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/navi...
Straight from my minister’s sermon today to you: “political grief.” Useful concept. 😔
www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/navi...
(And, thank you ☺️)
1. www.foodforthepoorja.org
2. theafj.org
3. (if you want to give to the govt) supportjamaica.gov.jm?fbclid=PAdGR...
(And, thank you ☺️)
(I’m sad for Jays fans, but my 93-yr-old mom is a big Dodgers fan. I’m so happy for her.)
Now, back to our regularly scheduled climate advocacy programming… (See below, by one of my heroes, Sen. Whitehouse.)
1. We fail if we don’t end free-to-pollute fossil fuel model. Period. Game over.
2. A crash looms, prefigured by collapse in home insurance/mortgage markets.
3. There are true villains in the story, and we have to tell it that way.
(I’m sad for Jays fans, but my 93-yr-old mom is a big Dodgers fan. I’m so happy for her.)
Now, back to our regularly scheduled climate advocacy programming… (See below, by one of my heroes, Sen. Whitehouse.)
1. We fail if we don’t end free-to-pollute fossil fuel model. Period. Game over.
2. A crash looms, prefigured by collapse in home insurance/mortgage markets.
3. There are true villains in the story, and we have to tell it that way.
1. We fail if we don’t end free-to-pollute fossil fuel model. Period. Game over.
2. A crash looms, prefigured by collapse in home insurance/mortgage markets.
3. There are true villains in the story, and we have to tell it that way.