M.J. Ferguson
banner
mattferg26.bsky.social
M.J. Ferguson
@mattferg26.bsky.social
British ecosocialist. Psephology hobbyist. Aspiring to use my uni education. Greens member (my views ≠ theirs). Duck enthusiast. 🏳️‍🌈🍉 (also still on twtr)
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
The year is 2125, the Chancellor unveils they will extend the emergency 5p cut on Fuel Duty, as per the long tradition whose origins are mysterious and forgotten.
November 25, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
This is another thing I had to cut from my piece - the minimum wage is best understood as an anti-poverty measure *for single or childless couples at the start of their working lives*. But it's not a lever that helps most people struggling to make ends meet. Only cash transfers do that.
Why the two-child limit has to go, in a chart.
November 25, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
I do try not to get too alarmist but I do have an increasing concern about the possibility of a major collapse in institutional legitimacy (government, courts, media) arising from what is a pretty undeniable shift on their part to the far right positions on most social issues
November 25, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
any ideological position that glorifies hierarchy and normalizes dominance as much as this one does will eventually become sexually depraved, no matter how much Temu-grade religion it sprinkles on top of the cupcake
Megyn Kelly: "I know somebody very close to this case…Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…He wasn't into like 8 year olds…There's a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old."
November 13, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Also most voters have just never thought remotely seriously about policy. “Should we get rid of illegal immigrants? Well, of course; they’re illegal!” There’s nothing deeper than that going on until they start seeing what that actually entails.
Some Dems and pundits overread the significance of Trump's win. They looked at dissatisfaction with the border and discerned a seismic cultural reaction to immigration levels inside the country. The former was real. The latter is a mirage.

(h/t @gelliottmorris.com)

newrepublic.com/article/2030...
November 13, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
🇺🇸🗳️ L'obtention par les démocrates d'une majorité au Sénat après les midterms de l'an prochain semblait jusqu'à présent folle tant les sièges en jeu leur sont défavorables. Mais l'ampleur de leur victoire la semaine dernière et les derniers sondages finissent par rendre ce scénario envisageable.
Ohio - Senate Polling:

🔵 Brown: 48%
🔴 Husted: 45%

Hart Research / Sept 22, 2025 - (Released today)
November 12, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Realignment, enshitification ratchet, or barbarism are basically the broad paths forward
If the US system remains trapped in an endless knife fight between a party of good government and a party of nihilistic governance then Europeans need to accept that the US will no longer be a stable partner long after Trump is gone
I'd just like to point out that we spent an entire shipment of air defense interceptors' worth of money on new signs for a name change that isn't even legally the name of the DoD.

Ukraine is currently experiencing rolling blackouts from Russian strikes, btw.
November 12, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
For all the leftist, liberal and moderate conservative schadenfreude over Trump's current predicament in the face of the Epstein files, a loss of control among the older generation of MAGA bosses opens up the Republican Party to a full hostile takeover by its Fuentes faction
November 12, 2025 at 10:08 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
One big partisan asymmetry is Democrats have tended to approach politics as “find out what voters care about, then talk about it a lot,” and Republicans have tended to approach politics as “talk about it a lot, then voters will care about it.”
November 12, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
it is fucking infuriating to think how one different staffing choice, someone like Doug Jones, could have made all the difference in the world
November 12, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
upholding norms. now let's see how successful that project has been...
so uh, what was Merrick Garland doing
November 12, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
The distinction is that Starmer is a legitimately checked out, gormless prick, going to football matches while Elon Musk foments race riots a stone’s throw away, while Wes’s entire career has been loudly projecting a ‘look how bad I want it’ energy. Which will probably be enough for the lobby.
I guess this depends on how far you think this is genuine idiocy and incompetence vs hamfisted panto intended to convey the message “Back Wes against Chump (x) or face bond market obliteration”. The latter would suggest longer term thinking, but I concede the former would be more in character.
November 12, 2025 at 8:32 AM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
At the risk of talking shop: there are just under 50 Government Bills before Parliament (including Employment Rights, English Devolution, Great British Energy) which aren’t getting the media attention that Coalition Bills at a similar point did. We’re missing proper scrutiny outside of Parliament.
This whole Streeting vs Starmer story is such a Westminster bubble inanity from a bored media class that has gotten addicted to toppling governments and abdicated any responsibility for what they're actually meant to be doing in a healthy society
November 12, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
The political forces that exploit lack of trust in institutions work to undermine institutions, further reducing trust in institutions, which they exploit for more power.

Much of the public blames the institutions, the govt, the elites in general, not the underminers specifically.

Tough problem.
The thing to understand about this is that this catastrophe in the UK has redounded to the political benefit of the very same people and political movement that pushed for it! Extremely perverse.
I wonder if the United States can learn anything from the last time a major industrialized country decided to isolate itself from the rest of the world?

Almost a decade after the Brexit vote, GDP in the UK is around 6-8% lower relative to peer countries. (Source: www.nber.org/papers/w34459)
November 11, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
I think we have fully established that punching your own voters is this only recognisable policy program of this government to date.
November 11, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Dems are not online and they are very proud of not being online. It’s like being proud in 1938 of reading books and not listening to the radio in: good job, how very grown-up of you, and also you’re never going to grasp where all this antisemitism comes from, because you’re not where the people are.
bees.leaflet.pub/3m5f5jfimlc2... Democratic Senators make healthy choices for themselves and their families, by not being online and living in reality where most people aren't insane white hats and black hats, and that's why us too-online folks get frustrated with them - and we're right
Hyperreality & Resistance - Bees and Spiders and Other Stuff
Democratic Politics in Heightened Reality in the Second Trump Era
bees.leaflet.pub
November 11, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Starmer allies coming out to defend him whilst simultaneously, accidentally and massively publicising the fact he might be ousted is very on-brand for this No10 operation.
November 11, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
by request: the last decade of UK politics as parties & as blocks

(left = Lab+LD+GRN, right = Con+Ref/Ukip)
November 4, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
I remember someone pointed out you could pretty much take over a large chunk of British politics without very much money, and then someone did
November 4, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
i want to repeat this: mamdani and spanberger have run similar campaigns tailored to their respective electorates and it is maddening to watch political journalists attempt to create some broad contrast where none exist
the other thing about this is that there is no reason to pit these candidates against each other? each are good fits for their respective electorates and each shows the value of vigorous campaigns focused on the stated material problems of voters.
November 4, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
you don't have to put on blackface to get social media attention. you can simply develop mild depression, join a menswear forum, spend the next 15 years arguing about pants, and then weaponize the knowledge against your enemies on social media.
November 4, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Since the election almost all the vote movement has been within these blocs rather than between them. The centre/left bloc vote is rising because a lot of Lab24 voters who had been saying "don't know" are now saying "Green".
November 4, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Notable in today's YouGov that the centre/left bloc - Lab/Green/LD/SNP are on 54%. With Reform/Tories on 43%. That's the biggest differential in a long time.

I think useful to track blocs given instability between parties at the moment.
November 4, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
Without the all-too-common assumption that Democrats are the only ones with agency, with voting choices only “Dems appealed to me” v. “Dems pushed me right,” the argument falls apart.

If any “moved too far” will influence upcoming US elections, it’s Trump and the GOP moving way too far right.
November 2, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Reposted by M.J. Ferguson
I doubt Democrats won in 2020 because of George Floyd protests and online “wokeness.” They won because of opposition to Trump, including how he mishandled the pandemic.

But that’s the point. It’s more pundit narrative than election-deciding.

And you may have noticed, US politics has changed.
November 2, 2025 at 1:17 PM