1. If it complies with BBB, which set out a plan to phase out SAVE by 2028. A conflict with Congress’ express wishes could be a ripe ground to block this abrupt end to SAVE.
2. Does a settlement like this comply with the APA? @aft.org
1. If it complies with BBB, which set out a plan to phase out SAVE by 2028. A conflict with Congress’ express wishes could be a ripe ground to block this abrupt end to SAVE.
2. Does a settlement like this comply with the APA? @aft.org
"We must clearly, loudly, and unequivocally state that was wrong.”
www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf...
"We must clearly, loudly, and unequivocally state that was wrong.”
www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf...
As for this case specifically: It is completely unreasonable to conclude that the balance of equities could ever favor the government when the plaintiffs face forced relocation.
As for this case specifically: It is completely unreasonable to conclude that the balance of equities could ever favor the government when the plaintiffs face forced relocation.
"'No law' means 'no law.' The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction ...."
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
"'No law' means 'no law.' The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction ...."
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
He has no criminal history and had legal protection from being sent to his native El Salvador — where it appears Mexico is sending him. www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
one of the agents picked up and threw congressional candidate kat abughazaleh to the ground.
You're welcome
You're welcome
But we do. Because the Supreme Court traded the Fourth Amendment for the MAGA Constitution.
slate.com/news-and-pol...
But we do. Because the Supreme Court traded the Fourth Amendment for the MAGA Constitution.
slate.com/news-and-pol...
He explains so well the real world application of this doctrine, which gives 1L's and beyond so much trouble. Really enjoyed reading it.
He explains so well the real world application of this doctrine, which gives 1L's and beyond so much trouble. Really enjoyed reading it.
A federal court order requiring them to comply with the Voting Rights Act.
This perversion of the VRA’s core purpose is disgusting, but even more so is the likelihood that SCOTUS sides with Louisiana.
A federal court order requiring them to comply with the Voting Rights Act.
This perversion of the VRA’s core purpose is disgusting, but even more so is the likelihood that SCOTUS sides with Louisiana.
Stay safe, stand with your community, and most importantly, know your rights:
Stay safe, stand with your community, and most importantly, know your rights:
If we are facing an existential threat, this self imposed quagmire shows me there is no intent to win at all.
If we are facing an existential threat, this self imposed quagmire shows me there is no intent to win at all.
If the answer is yes, SCOTUS will effectively declare that what remains of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. This is very, very ominous.
w/ @joshgerstein
www.politico.com/news/2025/07...
Plainclothes, no information, no warrant, where detentions are largely based on skin color or language spoken.
This is unreasonable, unconscionable, and unconstitutional.
This is a kidnapping. No uniform, no badge, civilian car. Who are they?
ICE? Sanctioned bounty hunters? Either way, they’re grabbing people without warrants.
How often is this happening, and why aren’t more people talking about it? Congress?
Plainclothes, no information, no warrant, where detentions are largely based on skin color or language spoken.
This is unreasonable, unconscionable, and unconstitutional.
VIDEO: Gunfire rings out as civilians leave U.S. aid distribution centers in southern Gaza.