Evanowski
@evanstjames.bsky.social
Junkyard cyberhobo who is geoguessing your mom with this mouth
Overall Grade: Mostly Correct Use
Here’s Why: While not inherently a controversial opinion to posit, it does invite debate, and talks about a relevant policy issue.
FoSUNRI Rating — 7.5
Here’s Why: While not inherently a controversial opinion to posit, it does invite debate, and talks about a relevant policy issue.
FoSUNRI Rating — 7.5
December 30, 2025 at 12:41 AM
Overall Grade: Mostly Correct Use
Here’s Why: While not inherently a controversial opinion to posit, it does invite debate, and talks about a relevant policy issue.
FoSUNRI Rating — 7.5
Here’s Why: While not inherently a controversial opinion to posit, it does invite debate, and talks about a relevant policy issue.
FoSUNRI Rating — 7.5
This user has been flagged by the Freedom of Speech Use National Rating Institute as a serial poster of this painting in incorrect contexts and thus will be banned in accordance with the Rockwellian Damocles Überhammer.
December 29, 2025 at 7:35 PM
This user has been flagged by the Freedom of Speech Use National Rating Institute as a serial poster of this painting in incorrect contexts and thus will be banned in accordance with the Rockwellian Damocles Überhammer.
Overall Grade: Incorrect use of FoS
Here’s why: It does not present a point of debate, nor does it posit a controversial ideal. It states what is effectively a proverb. 0/10 use a painting of king Solomon or someone next time.
Here’s why: It does not present a point of debate, nor does it posit a controversial ideal. It states what is effectively a proverb. 0/10 use a painting of king Solomon or someone next time.
December 29, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Overall Grade: Incorrect use of FoS
Here’s why: It does not present a point of debate, nor does it posit a controversial ideal. It states what is effectively a proverb. 0/10 use a painting of king Solomon or someone next time.
Here’s why: It does not present a point of debate, nor does it posit a controversial ideal. It states what is effectively a proverb. 0/10 use a painting of king Solomon or someone next time.
Overall rating: Semi-correct use of Freedom of Speech
Here’s Why: It presents a semi-controversial opinion that’s open to debate. Additionally, in a non-standard twist that we at the FoS Use National Rating Institute haven’t yet creating a grading criteria for: editing the source painting. Cont⬇️
Here’s Why: It presents a semi-controversial opinion that’s open to debate. Additionally, in a non-standard twist that we at the FoS Use National Rating Institute haven’t yet creating a grading criteria for: editing the source painting. Cont⬇️
December 29, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Overall rating: Semi-correct use of Freedom of Speech
Here’s Why: It presents a semi-controversial opinion that’s open to debate. Additionally, in a non-standard twist that we at the FoS Use National Rating Institute haven’t yet creating a grading criteria for: editing the source painting. Cont⬇️
Here’s Why: It presents a semi-controversial opinion that’s open to debate. Additionally, in a non-standard twist that we at the FoS Use National Rating Institute haven’t yet creating a grading criteria for: editing the source painting. Cont⬇️
Overall rating: Semi-correct use
Here’s why:
Poster does in fact, posit a controversial opinion in a format that does invite debate. BUT the poster does nothing to address the inherent fact that a dining-in experience will always be a slower experience compared to drive through, which implies….
Here’s why:
Poster does in fact, posit a controversial opinion in a format that does invite debate. BUT the poster does nothing to address the inherent fact that a dining-in experience will always be a slower experience compared to drive through, which implies….
Customers in drive-through windows shouldn't be assisted until everyone inside has been helped
December 29, 2025 at 3:13 AM
Overall rating: Semi-correct use
Here’s why:
Poster does in fact, posit a controversial opinion in a format that does invite debate. BUT the poster does nothing to address the inherent fact that a dining-in experience will always be a slower experience compared to drive through, which implies….
Here’s why:
Poster does in fact, posit a controversial opinion in a format that does invite debate. BUT the poster does nothing to address the inherent fact that a dining-in experience will always be a slower experience compared to drive through, which implies….
Welcome back to my now nightly Freedom of Speech use review, sponsored by Manscaped.
Overall, incorrect use. Has a touch of credit in that it has a little bit of a controversial opinion, but at its core is still complaining about winning, which feels against the spirit. 2/10 there are better images
Overall, incorrect use. Has a touch of credit in that it has a little bit of a controversial opinion, but at its core is still complaining about winning, which feels against the spirit. 2/10 there are better images
I might actually be fine winning all of our away games like that if we actually turned on a bit of flair when we play at home.
December 29, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Welcome back to my now nightly Freedom of Speech use review, sponsored by Manscaped.
Overall, incorrect use. Has a touch of credit in that it has a little bit of a controversial opinion, but at its core is still complaining about winning, which feels against the spirit. 2/10 there are better images
Overall, incorrect use. Has a touch of credit in that it has a little bit of a controversial opinion, but at its core is still complaining about winning, which feels against the spirit. 2/10 there are better images
The Freedom of Speech commentary posts will continue until morale improves
December 28, 2025 at 4:07 AM
The Freedom of Speech commentary posts will continue until morale improves
Ironically, this post about the meme being played out, is also itself, played out. The results in this being an incorrect usage of Freedom of Speech due to the Mainstream Opinion fallacy. 1/10
December 28, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Ironically, this post about the meme being played out, is also itself, played out. The results in this being an incorrect usage of Freedom of Speech due to the Mainstream Opinion fallacy. 1/10
Terrible opinion, correct usage. -1/10 no further notes due to the authors inability to speak without bias.
Good sports don't require the crowd to sing stupid songs for entertainment.
December 28, 2025 at 4:04 AM
Terrible opinion, correct usage. -1/10 no further notes due to the authors inability to speak without bias.
This I would argue, is spiritually the same as Freedom of Speech, but also implies that the poster believes an inherent degree of superiority of their opinion. 10/10 would love to see this used more.
December 28, 2025 at 3:57 AM
This I would argue, is spiritually the same as Freedom of Speech, but also implies that the poster believes an inherent degree of superiority of their opinion. 10/10 would love to see this used more.
This is what I what categorize as an incorrect use of Freedom of Speech, here’s why:
It is, granted, semi-faithful to the source material of the event that sparked the painting — a man talking about a public issue in an open forum.
(no this isn’t AI, I just actually use em-dashes)
Cont. Below
It is, granted, semi-faithful to the source material of the event that sparked the painting — a man talking about a public issue in an open forum.
(no this isn’t AI, I just actually use em-dashes)
Cont. Below
The Seattle Central Library continues to suffer from usability problems that were first noted more than two decades ago. Aka: put up some damn signs.
(See this for an early review of the problems in Koolhaas’s design placesjournal.org/article/seat...)
(See this for an early review of the problems in Koolhaas’s design placesjournal.org/article/seat...)
December 28, 2025 at 3:51 AM
This is what I what categorize as an incorrect use of Freedom of Speech, here’s why:
It is, granted, semi-faithful to the source material of the event that sparked the painting — a man talking about a public issue in an open forum.
(no this isn’t AI, I just actually use em-dashes)
Cont. Below
It is, granted, semi-faithful to the source material of the event that sparked the painting — a man talking about a public issue in an open forum.
(no this isn’t AI, I just actually use em-dashes)
Cont. Below
Another example of proper use of this painting. Outside of the original context, but it stands on the merit of its own humor, and the core element of the common man speaking for himself, regardless of potential correctness. 7/10 would like again
In my defence your honour she was holding a milkshake and the gate was open
December 28, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Another example of proper use of this painting. Outside of the original context, but it stands on the merit of its own humor, and the core element of the common man speaking for himself, regardless of potential correctness. 7/10 would like again
Now THIS is an acceptable use of this painting. It gives a bold, potentially incorrect but open to argument and discussion point that is outside a mainstream point of reasoning. It is also mildly humorous. 8/10 would like again.
Children of the Corn is a cautionary tale about the unintended consequence of ethanol subsidies.
December 28, 2025 at 3:40 AM
Now THIS is an acceptable use of this painting. It gives a bold, potentially incorrect but open to argument and discussion point that is outside a mainstream point of reasoning. It is also mildly humorous. 8/10 would like again.
Anyone who unironically posts the Freedom of Speech painting while stating a reasonable opinion as something bold will now be turbo-insta-blocked. It’s all a bunch of center-left NIMBYs self-congratulating themselves on being leftists.
The effort would be better spent on autofellatio.
The effort would be better spent on autofellatio.
December 28, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Anyone who unironically posts the Freedom of Speech painting while stating a reasonable opinion as something bold will now be turbo-insta-blocked. It’s all a bunch of center-left NIMBYs self-congratulating themselves on being leftists.
The effort would be better spent on autofellatio.
The effort would be better spent on autofellatio.
NIMBY ass posting, real bold opinion with Norman Rockwell’s most misused painting of all time.
99% sure this is a dead internet bot.
99% sure this is a dead internet bot.
December 28, 2025 at 3:29 AM
NIMBY ass posting, real bold opinion with Norman Rockwell’s most misused painting of all time.
99% sure this is a dead internet bot.
99% sure this is a dead internet bot.
Congrats on saying this about the only Billionaire who actually pays his full taxes.
The grievance is that if he paid taxes and we put those taxes toward helping people, gofundme wouldn't have to *exist*.
Billionaires existing means other people die. Billionaires did not earn that money. It is money *other people* earned and they stole from us.
It is unethical to be a billionaire.
Billionaires existing means other people die. Billionaires did not earn that money. It is money *other people* earned and they stole from us.
It is unethical to be a billionaire.
December 27, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Congrats on saying this about the only Billionaire who actually pays his full taxes.
Need @tacobell.bsky.social to come out with a rewards tier higher than Fire. My 6000+ lifetime rewards points need something to strive for.
December 23, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Need @tacobell.bsky.social to come out with a rewards tier higher than Fire. My 6000+ lifetime rewards points need something to strive for.
There are exactly 9 people on this website posting genuinely original content. Everyone else on here, generally, are NIMBY democrats and Muggle (In the Slossian sense) Wine Aunts
December 12, 2025 at 5:53 PM
There are exactly 9 people on this website posting genuinely original content. Everyone else on here, generally, are NIMBY democrats and Muggle (In the Slossian sense) Wine Aunts
Tragic as it is, I would absolutely love to have a local social club like this. Coordinating schedules & figuring out how to do it affordably is a nightmare though.
Unfortunately, I think they're right on this one. People, especially people with kids, are not going to enough grownup parties
Terminally online Right wingers are telling on themselves
December 9, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Tragic as it is, I would absolutely love to have a local social club like this. Coordinating schedules & figuring out how to do it affordably is a nightmare though.
People would ride trains way more often if they didn’t look like shit
December 6, 2025 at 3:36 AM
People would ride trains way more often if they didn’t look like shit
Posts like this (and the comments underneath) are one of the main reasons I deeply believe dead internet theory
December 1, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Posts like this (and the comments underneath) are one of the main reasons I deeply believe dead internet theory
As Apple begins seriously discussing succession plans for the Post-Cook era, here are my predictions for what the future looks like:
November 21, 2025 at 2:23 PM
As Apple begins seriously discussing succession plans for the Post-Cook era, here are my predictions for what the future looks like:
Someone’s playing the Factorio Space Exploration mod
found a use case for √6!!
usually it's √2 for square stuff or √3 for cube stuff or √5 for golden ratio stuff but √6 is now showing up for barycentric coordinate stuff c:
usually it's √2 for square stuff or √3 for cube stuff or √5 for golden ratio stuff but √6 is now showing up for barycentric coordinate stuff c:
November 16, 2025 at 5:04 AM
Someone’s playing the Factorio Space Exploration mod
Core concept is good, but maybe a little lacking in context as well. Think it should be based on a thresholded income to congregation size ratio with consideration to property upkeep relative to the location (also thresholded).
I think churches with revenue of more than $1,000,000 a year should pay a 10% tax, and churches with more than $5,000,000 in annual revenue should pay a 20% tax.
You can think I’m wrong about that, but I’m not.
You can think I’m wrong about that, but I’m not.
November 12, 2025 at 6:35 AM
Core concept is good, but maybe a little lacking in context as well. Think it should be based on a thresholded income to congregation size ratio with consideration to property upkeep relative to the location (also thresholded).
The entire boomer ass right wing “crazy coffee order” fantasy breaks down under the slightest pressure due to the fact that hipsters DO drink black coffee, we just make it in a chemex or v60 to allow their grounds proper blooming time & space.
the hipsters, they’re ordering double frufru mocha soy frappuccino. doesn’t anybody order a black coffee anymore
November 10, 2025 at 9:29 PM
The entire boomer ass right wing “crazy coffee order” fantasy breaks down under the slightest pressure due to the fact that hipsters DO drink black coffee, we just make it in a chemex or v60 to allow their grounds proper blooming time & space.