europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/u...
europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/u...
Check it out!
Intense secrecy around nuclear targeting means that most individuals—including lawmakers—do not have much understanding of how fateful decisions about what to target during wartime are made.
Check it out!
Later this year from @mitpress.bsky.social in @belfercenter.bsky.social's Studies in International Security book series-- Atomic Backfires: When Nuclear Policies Fail.
This is a sobering edited volume on how efforts to reduce nuclear weapons dangers may sometimes wind up exacerbating them.
🔗 fas.org/publication/targeting-strategies-nuclear-armed-states/
🔗 fas.org/publication/targeting-strategies-nuclear-armed-states/
www.twz.com/news-feature...
www.twz.com/news-feature...
www.cnn.com/2025/06/27/p...
www.cnn.com/2025/06/27/p...
Well done to @armscontrolwonk.bsky.social on this find. (2/2)
Well done to @armscontrolwonk.bsky.social on this find. (2/2)
That will make Britain even more dependent on US nukes.
That will make Britain even more dependent on US nukes.
Less than two weeks ago the SDR external reviewers had implied they were not keen on that choice (below).
Less than two weeks ago the SDR external reviewers had implied they were not keen on that choice (below).
If this outcome had resulted from a negotiation, would you support it?
This outcome=Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan blown up BUT HEU & centrifuge components survived; no IAEA inspections; no commitment not to rebuild.
If this outcome had resulted from a negotiation, would you support it?
This outcome=Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan blown up BUT HEU & centrifuge components survived; no IAEA inspections; no commitment not to rebuild.
Read "UK considers reintroducing air-launched tactical nuclear weapons" below. ⬇️
Read "UK considers reintroducing air-launched tactical nuclear weapons" below. ⬇️