Stephen Herzog
@herzogsm.bsky.social
Professor of the Practice, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies | Associate, Harvard Project on Managing the Atom | nuclear arms control, nonproliferation, disarmament, technology
Pinned
Stephen Herzog
@herzogsm.bsky.social
· Sep 26
Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation: The Technological Arms Race for (In)visibility
A robust nonproliferation regime has contained the spread of nuclear weapons to just nine states. Yet, emerging and disruptive technologies are reshaping the landscape of nuclear risks, presenting a ...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
1/7
How might AI enable the (non)proliferation of nuclear weapons? In a new #OpenAccess article in Risk Analysis (@socriskanalysis.bsky.social), Dave Allison & I explore this question. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
How might AI enable the (non)proliferation of nuclear weapons? In a new #OpenAccess article in Risk Analysis (@socriskanalysis.bsky.social), Dave Allison & I explore this question. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
1/2
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
Nuclear Negotiations
This volume studies nuclear negotiations and diplomacy from a negotiation perspective providing key insights for effective nuclear negotiations
link.springer.com
November 21, 2025 at 7:09 PM
1/2
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
1/2
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
Nuclear Negotiations
This volume studies nuclear negotiations and diplomacy from a negotiation perspective providing key insights for effective nuclear negotiations
link.springer.com
November 21, 2025 at 7:09 PM
1/2
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
I was delighted to contribute a chapter to the new book Nuclear Negotiations: Conditions for Effective Nuclear Diplomacy. It was produced by the Alva Myrdal Centre for Nuclear Disarmament @uupeace.bsky.social.
Check out the book! link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
@mvranka.bsky.social for @ejisbisa.bsky.social.
Their latest paper uses survey experiments on US & UK policy decision-makers to show that public backing for or opposition to nuclear use shapes perceptions of third party deterrent threats and affects elites’ support for nuclear use.
ssp.news/ls111125
Their latest paper uses survey experiments on US & UK policy decision-makers to show that public backing for or opposition to nuclear use shapes perceptions of third party deterrent threats and affects elites’ support for nuclear use.
ssp.news/ls111125
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use | European Journal of International Security | Cambridge Core
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
ssp.news
November 20, 2025 at 6:47 PM
@mvranka.bsky.social for @ejisbisa.bsky.social.
Their latest paper uses survey experiments on US & UK policy decision-makers to show that public backing for or opposition to nuclear use shapes perceptions of third party deterrent threats and affects elites’ support for nuclear use.
ssp.news/ls111125
Their latest paper uses survey experiments on US & UK policy decision-makers to show that public backing for or opposition to nuclear use shapes perceptions of third party deterrent threats and affects elites’ support for nuclear use.
ssp.news/ls111125
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
“For international relations and security studies scholars, the continued reluctance by nuclear-armed states to employ their arsenals – even when fighting and losing major wars – remains a significant puzzle,” write @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, & (1/2)
November 20, 2025 at 6:47 PM
“For international relations and security studies scholars, the continued reluctance by nuclear-armed states to employ their arsenals – even when fighting and losing major wars – remains a significant puzzle,” write @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, & (1/2)
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
doing experiments with British MPs is one of my favorite parts of working at @prcp.cuni.cz ,)
1/4
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
November 13, 2025 at 9:14 AM
doing experiments with British MPs is one of my favorite parts of working at @prcp.cuni.cz ,)
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Does public opinion shape elite preferences for nuclear weapon use? 🚀 Our new article in @ejisbisa.bsky.social provides the first experimental evidence that political elites are at least partially influenced by public sentiment when considering high-level decisions on nuclear weapon use.
November 12, 2025 at 9:13 AM
Does public opinion shape elite preferences for nuclear weapon use? 🚀 Our new article in @ejisbisa.bsky.social provides the first experimental evidence that political elites are at least partially influenced by public sentiment when considering high-level decisions on nuclear weapon use.
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
1/4
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
November 12, 2025 at 2:45 PM
1/4
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
1/4
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
November 12, 2025 at 2:45 PM
1/4
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Policymakers often do listen to publics when formulating preferences on nuclear weapon use. Our #OpenAccess article provides first-of-kind evidence about when publics enable, constrain, or are less influential. @ejisbisa.bsky.social @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
Link: doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Does public opinion affect policymaker preferences about nuclear weapon use?
New article from: @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social.
Read in @ejisbisa.bsky.social, @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
New article from: @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social.
Read in @ejisbisa.bsky.social, @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
November 12, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Does public opinion affect policymaker preferences about nuclear weapon use?
New article from: @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social.
Read in @ejisbisa.bsky.social, @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
New article from: @herzogsm.bsky.social, @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social.
Read in @ejisbisa.bsky.social, @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Does public opinion matter for nuclear policy? We say yes, in @ejisbisa.bsky.social.
Whether the public backs nuclear use can sway leaders’ preferences and affects external perceptions of the credibility of deterrence.
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Whether the public backs nuclear use can sway leaders’ preferences and affects external perceptions of the credibility of deterrence.
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use | European Journal of International Security | Cambridge Core
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
doi.org
November 11, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Does public opinion matter for nuclear policy? We say yes, in @ejisbisa.bsky.social.
Whether the public backs nuclear use can sway leaders’ preferences and affects external perceptions of the credibility of deterrence.
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Whether the public backs nuclear use can sway leaders’ preferences and affects external perceptions of the credibility of deterrence.
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Congratulations to @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social. @herzogsm.bsky.social, and @mvranka.bsky.social on their new article! They address address the central question: can public opinion influence decision-makers’ views on nuclear weapon use?
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
November 12, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Congratulations to @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @laurensukin.bsky.social. @herzogsm.bsky.social, and @mvranka.bsky.social on their new article! They address address the central question: can public opinion influence decision-makers’ views on nuclear weapon use?
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
#OpenAccess from @ejisbisa.bsky.social -
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use - https://cup.org/4nNXCtY
- Michal Smetana, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social
#FirstView
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use - https://cup.org/4nNXCtY
- Michal Smetana, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social
#FirstView
November 11, 2025 at 1:20 PM
#OpenAccess from @ejisbisa.bsky.social -
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use - https://cup.org/4nNXCtY
- Michal Smetana, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social
#FirstView
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use - https://cup.org/4nNXCtY
- Michal Smetana, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & @mvranka.bsky.social
#FirstView
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
1/2 Our new paper has just been published in
@ejisbisa.bsky.social 🥰 We designed & fielded an original elite experiment to investigate when & how public opinion on nuclear weapon use shaped elite decision-making.
@ejisbisa.bsky.social 🥰 We designed & fielded an original elite experiment to investigate when & how public opinion on nuclear weapon use shaped elite decision-making.
November 11, 2025 at 2:07 PM
1/2 Our new paper has just been published in
@ejisbisa.bsky.social 🥰 We designed & fielded an original elite experiment to investigate when & how public opinion on nuclear weapon use shaped elite decision-making.
@ejisbisa.bsky.social 🥰 We designed & fielded an original elite experiment to investigate when & how public opinion on nuclear weapon use shaped elite decision-making.
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Paper in @ejisbisa.bsky.social by @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @laurensukin.bsky.social , @herzogsm.bsky.social and @mvranka.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Paper in @ejisbisa.bsky.social by @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @laurensukin.bsky.social , @herzogsm.bsky.social and @mvranka.bsky.social
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use | European Journal of International Security | Cambridge Core
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
doi.org
November 11, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Paper in @ejisbisa.bsky.social by @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @laurensukin.bsky.social , @herzogsm.bsky.social and @mvranka.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1017/eis....
Paper in @ejisbisa.bsky.social by @smetanamichal.bsky.social, @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @laurensukin.bsky.social , @herzogsm.bsky.social and @mvranka.bsky.social
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
If #Trump starts testing #nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner? My 🎙 #podcast, #TheGlobalAgora, with @herzogsm.bsky.social.
▶️ #Apple podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
▶️ #Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/0m4h...
▶️ #Goodpods go.goodpods.com/sd8Z0u
#AHouseOfDynamite
▶️ #Apple podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
▶️ #Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/0m4h...
▶️ #Goodpods go.goodpods.com/sd8Z0u
#AHouseOfDynamite
If Trump starts testing nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner?
Podcast Episode · The Global Agora · 11/06/2025 · 33m
podcasts.apple.com
November 7, 2025 at 9:30 AM
If #Trump starts testing #nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner? My 🎙 #podcast, #TheGlobalAgora, with @herzogsm.bsky.social.
▶️ #Apple podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
▶️ #Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/0m4h...
▶️ #Goodpods go.goodpods.com/sd8Z0u
#AHouseOfDynamite
▶️ #Apple podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
▶️ #Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/0m4h...
▶️ #Goodpods go.goodpods.com/sd8Z0u
#AHouseOfDynamite
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
If #Trump starts testing #nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner? Listen to another episode of my 🎙 #podcast, #TheGlobalAgora. I talked to @herzogsm.bsky.social.
▶️ podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/and...
▶️ podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/and...
If Trump starts testing nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner? by The Global Agora
US President Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social account that, because of other countries' testing programs, he has instructed the Department of War to begin testing nuclear weapons on an equal bas...
podcasters.spotify.com
November 6, 2025 at 9:34 AM
If #Trump starts testing #nuclear weapons, who will be the biggest winner? Listen to another episode of my 🎙 #podcast, #TheGlobalAgora. I talked to @herzogsm.bsky.social.
▶️ podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/and...
▶️ podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/and...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
A new & broad public opinion survey shows US reputation strengthened by actions related to Russia's war against Ukraine, as caution without abandonment & firmness without escalation reassured allies, argue @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & Alexander Lanoszka @foreignpolicy.com 5/10
Reliable, Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
foreignpolicy.com
October 31, 2025 at 8:12 AM
A new & broad public opinion survey shows US reputation strengthened by actions related to Russia's war against Ukraine, as caution without abandonment & firmness without escalation reassured allies, argue @laurensukin.bsky.social, @herzogsm.bsky.social & Alexander Lanoszka @foreignpolicy.com 5/10
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
US, Russia’s tests & subs, Euro deterrent, conventional forces, US space force & House of Dynamite in this week’s STAND newsletter, a project by @swp-intsecurity.bsky.social on recent news & analyses to better #underSTAND #nuclear #space #deterrence & #threats 1/10
October 31, 2025 at 8:07 AM
US, Russia’s tests & subs, Euro deterrent, conventional forces, US space force & House of Dynamite in this week’s STAND newsletter, a project by @swp-intsecurity.bsky.social on recent news & analyses to better #underSTAND #nuclear #space #deterrence & #threats 1/10
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
Very pleased to have published a short piece with Lauren and Stephen in Foreign Policy that describes our latest research.
1/5
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
Reliable Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
foreignpolicy.com
October 21, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Very pleased to have published a short piece with Lauren and Stephen in Foreign Policy that describes our latest research.
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
1/5
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
Reliable Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
foreignpolicy.com
October 20, 2025 at 7:43 PM
1/5
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
As the United States faces simultaneous challenges from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and others, it cannot afford to equate credibility with maximalist shows of force.
Reliable Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
foreignpolicy.com
October 20, 2025 at 11:30 PM
As the United States faces simultaneous challenges from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and others, it cannot afford to equate credibility with maximalist shows of force.
1/5
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
Reliable Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
foreignpolicy.com
October 20, 2025 at 7:43 PM
1/5
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023.
foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
I was a guest on the IISS podcast "The Arms Control Primer" w/ @bollfrass.bsky.social & former @iaeaorg.bsky.social DG Hans Blix. We covered some lessons of the Iraq case for nuclear nonproliferation & verification. Check out the new episode: www.iiss.org/podcasts/arm...
October 16, 2025 at 2:46 PM
I was a guest on the IISS podcast "The Arms Control Primer" w/ @bollfrass.bsky.social & former @iaeaorg.bsky.social DG Hans Blix. We covered some lessons of the Iraq case for nuclear nonproliferation & verification. Check out the new episode: www.iiss.org/podcasts/arm...
I was a guest on the IISS podcast "The Arms Control Primer" w/ @bollfrass.bsky.social & former @iaeaorg.bsky.social DG Hans Blix. We covered some lessons of the Iraq case for nuclear nonproliferation & verification. Check out the new episode: www.iiss.org/podcasts/arm...
October 16, 2025 at 2:46 PM
I was a guest on the IISS podcast "The Arms Control Primer" w/ @bollfrass.bsky.social & former @iaeaorg.bsky.social DG Hans Blix. We covered some lessons of the Iraq case for nuclear nonproliferation & verification. Check out the new episode: www.iiss.org/podcasts/arm...
Reposted by Stephen Herzog
AI could fuel a tech arms race between proliferation-enabling & detection-enhancing tools - favoring the former & straining conventional monitoring & verification methods, which poses risks to nonproliferation, analyze @herzogsm.bsky.social & David Allison @socriskanalysis.bsky.social 8/10
Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation: The Technological Arms Race for (In)visibility
A robust nonproliferation regime has contained the spread of nuclear weapons to just nine states. Yet, emerging and disruptive technologies are reshaping the landscape of nuclear risks, presenting a ....
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
October 3, 2025 at 7:39 AM
AI could fuel a tech arms race between proliferation-enabling & detection-enhancing tools - favoring the former & straining conventional monitoring & verification methods, which poses risks to nonproliferation, analyze @herzogsm.bsky.social & David Allison @socriskanalysis.bsky.social 8/10