BartyBooper
LightNews LightNews
banner
bartybooper.bsky.social
BartyBooper
@bartybooper.bsky.social
43 followers 140 following 12 posts
PHD brain genous
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by BartyBooper
bakoon.bsky.social
they have extracted all the semen from every ice agent who plugged themselves alone in a marriott bathroom and now the president is going to drink it
January 14, 2026 at 10:45 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
djinnandtonic.bsky.social
If even in this late hour you (or anybody you talk to) remains unconvinced of the moral and pragmatic imperative to abolish ICE:

Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent that killed Renee Good in cold blood, is a long-time veteran of the agency. He was brought on before this admin lowered hiring standards
January 8, 2026 at 9:02 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
adamserwer.bsky.social
one takeaway from the grok noncon porn thing is that much of the media just isn't interested in an issue they can't pretend has two sides or that doesn't give them an opportunity to shit on the left. Also it would be uncomfortable to justify remaining on twitter after acknowledging it
January 6, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
leyawn.bsky.social
this is your mission. our pedophile president needs you to jump out of a helicopter to kidnap a head of state and his wife so some oil ceos can make a lot of money. we’ll be watching from a resort in florida that still serves wedge salad and checking how many retweets we get. good luck soldier
January 3, 2026 at 10:57 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
utopia-defer.red
it’s not power consolidation. it’s merely very effective political terror that will scar the lives of hundreds of thousands on our current trajectory while a loud proud chorus insists that nothing more can be done.
December 19, 2025 at 3:52 AM
Reposted by BartyBooper
johncarlbaker.bsky.social
The fact that we have super wealthy and extremely stupid people trying to set themselves up as new nobles has made historical nobility, which I only know from books, far more real to me. These people were not smart, they did not rule well, and rigid hierarchies of domination are very bad.
December 10, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
ok-but-still.bsky.social
petro is so beast
November 13, 2025 at 10:54 PM
bartybooper.bsky.social
This is just mortgage backed debt obligations but replacing "mortgage" with "data center" and "debt" with "rent," right? And instead of being built on incorrect estimations of mortgage-holder financial stability it's built on incorrect assumptions of AI utility?

Please finance guys find a new scam
chrisdeleon.bsky.social Chris DeLeonⓥDevPods.gg gamedev collabs @chrisdeleon.bsky.social · Oct 30
"sophisticated financial engineering" oh that's not good
October 31, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
dasharez0ne.bsky.social
IM RIGHT - dashare.zone ADMIN
WHAT IS CONVENIENCE???? IS IT WAKIG UP AT 6 IN THE DAMB MORNING AND SHOVELLIN SHIT SO WHEN YOUR TOO TIRED TO COOK AT 6PM YOU CAN PAY SOMEONE HALF YOUR DAMB MONEY TO BRING YOU FOOD ? IS IT ABDICATING YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PIRATE CORPORATE VIDEO AND PAYING NETFLIX OR AMAZON TO "LET YOU" WATCH A MOVIE? IS IT SHELLIGN OUT $$$$$$ EVREY MONTH TO A LANDLORD YOU HATE WHO WONT FIX YOUR SHIT , SO YOU CAN LIVE CLOSE TO BUSINESSES WHO YOU ALSO HAVE TO PAY TO USE???????? WHY DOES EVERY THING IN "DA ECONOMY" REST ON WORKING CLASS PEOPLE TO SHELL OUT EVERY DAMN DOLLAR TO SOME ASS HOLE?????? WHY IS THE ONLY ETHICAL PURCHASE A SKELATEN TSHRIT FROM AN ONLINE TSHRIT SHOP???? I AINT MATLOCK SO I CANT SOLVE THIS MYSTERY ANY WAY "CONVENIENCE ISNT REAL IF YOU HAVE TO WORK IN A SHITTY BUILDING FOR 30 OR 40 HOUR'S A WEEK FOR A GUY YOU HATE WHO WORKS FOR A COMPANY YOU HATE TO PAY FOR CONVENIENCE ITS NOT REAL " - DASHARE.ZONE ADMIN
October 26, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
revbennyd.bsky.social
Here's a photo of my friend and colleague, Jorge Bautista, getting shot in the face with a flashbang grenade. The ICE Agent is so afraid of Jorge (who was posing no threat) that he has wet himself. Please share this photo. Everyone needs to know what cowards ICE agents are.
October 23, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
strictlychristo.bsky.social
The LEAST intense energy that every masked ICE Gestapo-like secret police agent deserves from every American who values their freedom. 🖕 #AbolishICE
October 22, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Reposted by BartyBooper
ryanlcooper.com
"where laws aren’t there, the pitchforks must always be. A society that expects laws to substitute for, rather than channel, public outrage, is a society not long for this world in any form worthy of the name." www.interfluidity.com/v2/4013.html
interfluidity » Shame.
www.interfluidity.com
October 15, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
brendelbored.bsky.social
I know the whole “every accusation is a confession” thing but it’s pretty clear this is the most elitist government that’s existed in decades. It’s just 12 billionaires in a group chat sharing banned Reddit memes
October 15, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
johnathanperk.bsky.social
Good reminder, from a fellow lawyer whose advice I trust. #ICE
October 14, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
flyingrodent.bsky.social
They’re morons, they’re just dickheads who accidentally struck it rich by chance, not by merit, and this system does not give a fuck about the ability or morality of the idiots who relentlessly quest to amass as much money as possible
October 12, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
sarahjeong.bsky.social
I have a theory www.theverge.com/policy/79849...
American politics has devolved into shitposting and aura farming
The Frog is owning the president.
www.theverge.com
October 11, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
mobute.bsky.social
As Democrats contemplate a 2026 or 2028 run and wonder what message will most motivate voters, they need to understand that the minimum opening bid is vengeance.
Justice for All - Truthdig
To restore the rule of law, Democrats must enforce the constitution with brass knuckles like there’s nothing to lose. Because there isn’t.
www.truthdig.com
October 10, 2025 at 6:27 PM
bartybooper.bsky.social
I'm fuckin ready for ANYTHING
October 5, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
cristianfarias.com
This video of Chicagoans intervening to save a man from being abducted off the streets by ICE is making the rounds on Instagram.

Community action works.

Source: www.instagram.com/reel/DPZL2AL...
October 5, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
samharrison1812.bsky.social
They're also revealing their ignorance of the online economy. Kirk was doing the opposite of persuasion; he was chopping up clips of ill-informed students designed to reassure his followers that their opponents were all morons and it wasn't worth inquiring into their ideas any further
michaelhobbes.bsky.social Michael Hobbes @michaelhobbes.bsky.social · Sep 13
These people have smarted themselves into the dumbest fucking arguments.

Determining whether someone is "doing politics the right way" depends almost entirely on the content of their speech! If someone lies constantly and endorses authoritarians that's not practicing good politics.
What Ezra means by "the right way," and what I meant expressing a similar line this morning, is that Kirk was operating within a liberal framework that was modeled on persuasion and included real, robust support for free speech. Obviously it's not an endorsement of the content.
September 13, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Reposted by BartyBooper
ripperoni.com
Apropos of nothing, here's a thread of some Charlie Kirk highlights
September 11, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Reposted by BartyBooper
gregk.co.uk
An excerpt from Omar El Akkad on the grotesque ideological poverty of contemporary liberalism:
Once again, the party's supporters react to these demonstrations by chanting "Four more years, four more years," which by now can no longer be described as simply ghoulish. There is instead a kind of mechanical fear laced in it, a sense among these people, as there has been a sense among all people at all times on whom the judgment of future historians has started to dawn, that they have stepped too far into complicity with something evil. Look up photographs of what we now consider this country's—any country's— most morally diseased moments. The dogs being let loose on men and women asking for basic dignity, the marching of undesirables through the streets, the wrath, the bloodlust. Ignore, for a moment, the people engaged most directly in the violence. Look instead at the faces of those who watch from the sidelines. Often, what you'll find is not an expression of proud support or the shock and horror all these people will claim to have felt much later, after the verdict is in. Rather, you'll see a childish little smirk. It's the smirk of someone who has come to realize the ugliness of the enterprise they have passively aligned with but cannot muster the courage to abandon now. The soul, what's left of it, buckles under the weight of contradiction, and all one can do is hide behind that pained little smirk, the half-stance of the spineless, the chanting, with not quite enough conviction, of four more years, four more years, as the bodies pile up outside one's door. It's difficult to live in this country in this moment and not come to the conclusion that the principal concern of the modern American liberal is, at all times, not what one does or believes or supports or opposes, but what one is seen to be. From this outcome, everything is reverse-engineered. Being seen as someone who believes in justice-not the messy, fraught work of achieving it—is the starting point of any conversation on justice. Saying the right slogans supersedes whatever it is those slogans are … Beyond the stream of distractions, there is a much more existential vulnerability. Whatever derangement currently occupies conservative American politics is, at least, something of very real consequence: the minority groups they want to legislate out of every facet of society, the books they want to ban, the mechanisms of democracy they want to subvert—none of it is hypothetical. But if inoffensive centrism is seen to be concerned with these things only in as far as it reflects on the centrist's self-image, if the Hillary Clintons of the world can muster great outrage at the fortunes of the Barbie movie at the Oscars but nothing at population-wide military murder sprees, then every Republican will always be able to say, truthfully: At least there's no contradiction between what I am, what I claim concerns me, and what I plan to do. This is the crux of it, the unavoidable reckoning. Every morning countless well-paid, well-educated foot soldiers in the employ of the Democratic Party wake up and decide on the day's talking points. Every morning a small army of spokespeople step to the lecterns and deliver statements about how much the president cares for innocent lives, or the immense effort the United States makes to minimize unnecessary suffering, or whatever it is that needs to be said that day so as to launder the evil done between the last press conference and this one. A growing number of people ask a different question; the world asks a different question. The world, full of people who factor not one iota in the calculus of those morning meetings, looks upon this and asks, simply: Beyond self-interest, what do you believe in? And every morning the answer, dressed up in anesthetic euphemism and dependent on our collective capacity for resignation to the lesser of two evils, is: Nothing. It's a kind of thinking predicated on the implicit belief that, for certain people, the only choice is between negations of varying severity. The system does not work for you, was never intended to work for you, but as an act of magnanimity on our part, you may choose the degree to which it works against you. While any liberal politician who succumbs to the lure of this framing may benefit in the short term, there is an inevitable and deeply unpleasant terminus waiting. Eventually, the calculus becomes, on pragmatic terms, clear. How much worse can some hypothetical oppression be compared to the current, very real one, which has the additional indignity of being propped up politically and financially by the same Free World whose leaders simultaneously give impassioned speeches about their support for democracy? If both outcomes entail injury, why should anyone opt for the one that adds insult too? For some, even a hint of self-interest already produces these kinds of results— consider the gaggle of world-famous sports stars who've happily sided with murderous regimes such as that of Saudi Arabia, helping whitewash the government's image in exchange for not much more than money. For others, the bar is much, much higher. But the moral prohibition on siding with any administration that endorses genocide will force a different flavor of the exact same logic that centrist liberalism has depended on for so long: hold your nose and align with the least worst thing. Only the least worst thing will no longer be the mild, ethics-agnostic emptiness of modern Western liberalism, nor will it be the multitude of barbaric authoritarians and their secret prisons. It will be communal solidarity, or else nothing, a walking away from all of this. Countless otherwise pragmatic people who would in any other circumstance choose liberalism by default will instead decide none of this is worth the damage to one's soul. They will instead support no one, vote for no one, wash their hands of any ordering of the world that results in choices no better than this. And the obvious _centrist refrain—But do you want the deranged right wing to win?—should, after even a moment of self-reflection, yield to a far more important question: How empty does your message have to be for a deranged right wing to even have a chance of winning? Of all the epitaphs that may one day be written on the gravestone of Western liberalism, the most damning is this: Faced off against a nihilistic, endlessly cruel manifestation of conservatism, and somehow managed to make it close.
August 12, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Reposted by BartyBooper
lauren.rotatingsandwiches.com
PICARD: Mr. Data, we need to discuss these anomalies in your latest reports DATA: Respectfully sir, the odds I would make a mistake in my work are 43,650,000 to- PICARD: On this map of the alpha quadrant you've labeled Klingon "Krisphon" and Vulcan "Vuvutrishpo" GEORDI: Captain, be reasonable! He's not supposed to be good at that. Just ask him to write another poem about cats
August 8, 2025 at 1:48 PM
Reposted by BartyBooper
nberlat.bsky.social
people really have a lot invested in the idea that "genius" exists.

meritocracy is a myth, folks. no one accomplished anything on their own. worshipping people's brains is just another religion, and a particularly shallow one at that.
nberlat.bsky.social Noah Berlatsky @nberlat.bsky.social · Aug 4
the whole idea that some people are "geniuses" is bad and reactionary and we should do away with it. 1
August 4, 2025 at 11:00 PM