WuWei2024
@wuwei2024.bsky.social
Calling out the horseshoe.
I don’t have patience for b.s.
Environmental Scientist QA/QC
Giving up politics for 🧶.
🦓HEDS/MCAS
I don’t have patience for b.s.
Environmental Scientist QA/QC
Giving up politics for 🧶.
🦓HEDS/MCAS
Reposted by WuWei2024
Many of us thought Indivisible was a pro-democracy group, or an anti-Republican group. It is, in fact, an anti-Democratic Party group.
The group behind “No Kings,” @indivisible.org warns primary challengers for some Senate Dems are coming after the big cave in shutdown battle. youtu.be/rGU51i00ed8?...
BREAKING: MESSAGE TO SENATE: 'SELLOUTS GET PRIMARIED' Ezra Levin weighs in
YouTube video by Jim Acosta
youtu.be
November 11, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Many of us thought Indivisible was a pro-democracy group, or an anti-Republican group. It is, in fact, an anti-Democratic Party group.
Reposted by WuWei2024
It's so frustrating. Our party is caught between a rock and a hard place all due to entitled ass people who don't vote in the first place, and or vote Republican anyway. They love to scream fix this at Dems without any self reflection.
November 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM
It's so frustrating. Our party is caught between a rock and a hard place all due to entitled ass people who don't vote in the first place, and or vote Republican anyway. They love to scream fix this at Dems without any self reflection.
Reposted by WuWei2024
I think it's because some of the people who are mad at the cavers are saying "primary all Dems" and constructing elaborate antisemitic conspiracy theories.
And pushback against that is pretty minimal for some reason.
And pushback against that is pretty minimal for some reason.
Why is the "we must be united!" hectoring directed at people who are mad at the Cavers and not to the Cavers? Everyone who's mad was united, then the Cave Caucus walked across the aisle and betrayed what the public had been told was the Dem position.
The sooner we get past internal recriminations and back to fighting united, the better off we all are — the likelier our victory next November.
November 10, 2025 at 11:12 PM
I think it's because some of the people who are mad at the cavers are saying "primary all Dems" and constructing elaborate antisemitic conspiracy theories.
And pushback against that is pretty minimal for some reason.
And pushback against that is pretty minimal for some reason.
Nobody takes raving loonies on the internet seriously either, especially when they don't vote to give Dems power and expect miracles, and fail to comprehend how 8 < 45 < 53.
Nobody in this country takes Democrats in Congress seriously, after Senate caving today.
November 10, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Nobody takes raving loonies on the internet seriously either, especially when they don't vote to give Dems power and expect miracles, and fail to comprehend how 8 < 45 < 53.
BlueSky mob in a nutshell.
So online and vocal with Dem hatred but completely ignorant of how anything works.
So online and vocal with Dem hatred but completely ignorant of how anything works.
November 10, 2025 at 5:33 PM
BlueSky mob in a nutshell.
So online and vocal with Dem hatred but completely ignorant of how anything works.
So online and vocal with Dem hatred but completely ignorant of how anything works.
Geezus. Jeffries is in the House, dummy.
Obnoxious ignorance is why we’re here. 🤦♀️
Obnoxious ignorance is why we’re here. 🤦♀️
November 10, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Geezus. Jeffries is in the House, dummy.
Obnoxious ignorance is why we’re here. 🤦♀️
Obnoxious ignorance is why we’re here. 🤦♀️
Reposted by WuWei2024
Reporter: Dr Oz said that—
Jeffries: Who? Nobody who is serious in this country takes Dr. Oz seriously… I’m not going to respond to any comments from randos like Dr. Oz who is woefully unqualified.
Jeffries: Who? Nobody who is serious in this country takes Dr. Oz seriously… I’m not going to respond to any comments from randos like Dr. Oz who is woefully unqualified.
November 10, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Reporter: Dr Oz said that—
Jeffries: Who? Nobody who is serious in this country takes Dr. Oz seriously… I’m not going to respond to any comments from randos like Dr. Oz who is woefully unqualified.
Jeffries: Who? Nobody who is serious in this country takes Dr. Oz seriously… I’m not going to respond to any comments from randos like Dr. Oz who is woefully unqualified.
Reposted by WuWei2024
AIPAC has become the "woke" for the terminally online.
You dont like something...AIPAC must have done it...
It follows the endless "rigged" mindset started on the Left and perfected on the Right.
Find someone to blame instead of looking in the mirror.
You dont like something...AIPAC must have done it...
It follows the endless "rigged" mindset started on the Left and perfected on the Right.
Find someone to blame instead of looking in the mirror.
November 10, 2025 at 5:10 PM
AIPAC has become the "woke" for the terminally online.
You dont like something...AIPAC must have done it...
It follows the endless "rigged" mindset started on the Left and perfected on the Right.
Find someone to blame instead of looking in the mirror.
You dont like something...AIPAC must have done it...
It follows the endless "rigged" mindset started on the Left and perfected on the Right.
Find someone to blame instead of looking in the mirror.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Regardless of what the backroom specifics are that you’re bluntly not privy to, the blame for the suffering & the lose-lose situation is on Republicans who control a trifecta & everyone who keeps voting for or otherwise enabling them like conspiratorial trash such as the OP does.
November 10, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Regardless of what the backroom specifics are that you’re bluntly not privy to, the blame for the suffering & the lose-lose situation is on Republicans who control a trifecta & everyone who keeps voting for or otherwise enabling them like conspiratorial trash such as the OP does.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Sooo.
AIPAC wanted the government shutdown to end, so SNAP benefits and enhanced PTC could expire anyway?
I swear, y'all will blame the Jews for everything.
Good thing Fetterman gets a pass.
AIPAC wanted the government shutdown to end, so SNAP benefits and enhanced PTC could expire anyway?
I swear, y'all will blame the Jews for everything.
Good thing Fetterman gets a pass.
November 10, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Sooo.
AIPAC wanted the government shutdown to end, so SNAP benefits and enhanced PTC could expire anyway?
I swear, y'all will blame the Jews for everything.
Good thing Fetterman gets a pass.
AIPAC wanted the government shutdown to end, so SNAP benefits and enhanced PTC could expire anyway?
I swear, y'all will blame the Jews for everything.
Good thing Fetterman gets a pass.
So many opinionated “experts” on the Senate all of a sudden. Too bad they weren’t as vocal about voting for a Democrat in November 2024.
November 10, 2025 at 5:02 PM
So many opinionated “experts” on the Senate all of a sudden. Too bad they weren’t as vocal about voting for a Democrat in November 2024.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Do not let the bros and leftists distance themselves from Fetterman. This is who they pushed for and got elected with the backing and full throated support of Bernie Sanders.
Im also here to remind yall that JOHN FETTERMAN was hand selected by Bernie Sanders and won his primary over a Black millennial gay man who was already working in congress because leftists couldnt vote for a Black gay Millennial man born in 1990——
November 10, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Do not let the bros and leftists distance themselves from Fetterman. This is who they pushed for and got elected with the backing and full throated support of Bernie Sanders.
How many people screeching about Schumer right now, gave us Fetterman? And gave the GOP the majority.
November 10, 2025 at 4:16 AM
How many people screeching about Schumer right now, gave us Fetterman? And gave the GOP the majority.
Definitely an op taking place.
November 10, 2025 at 4:05 AM
Definitely an op taking place.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Or it means those facing voters are getting hammered from both sides. Those who are going unpaid want their paychecks to resume, & those who aren't personally affected want them to fight, so the ones who can't be punished are voting to end the shutdown so the ones who can be punished can vote "no."
November 10, 2025 at 3:50 AM
Or it means those facing voters are getting hammered from both sides. Those who are going unpaid want their paychecks to resume, & those who aren't personally affected want them to fight, so the ones who can't be punished are voting to end the shutdown so the ones who can be punished can vote "no."
Reposted by WuWei2024
You gave us 45 Democratic Senators but expect a majority. Take a stadium full of seats.
November 10, 2025 at 2:42 AM
You gave us 45 Democratic Senators but expect a majority. Take a stadium full of seats.
Reposted by WuWei2024
The reporting being garbage is the reason I was not willing to buy into the standard ragebait. It's not even the first time this story ran, only difference is that this happened this time I guess.
November 10, 2025 at 2:36 AM
The reporting being garbage is the reason I was not willing to buy into the standard ragebait. It's not even the first time this story ran, only difference is that this happened this time I guess.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Now for some levity and logic based in facts.
November 10, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Now for some levity and logic based in facts.
Consistent?
Thanks to him we have Fetterman, Gabbard, Turner - fraudsters and chaos agents.
Thanks to him we have Fetterman, Gabbard, Turner - fraudsters and chaos agents.
November 10, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Consistent?
Thanks to him we have Fetterman, Gabbard, Turner - fraudsters and chaos agents.
Thanks to him we have Fetterman, Gabbard, Turner - fraudsters and chaos agents.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Take you own advice @bradleywhitford.bsky.social Schumer voted No after urging others to also vote No. And Jefferies has put out a strong statement for a No vote if the House comes back.
So read the room. Don't be a kneejerk rabble rouser.
So read the room. Don't be a kneejerk rabble rouser.
November 10, 2025 at 2:14 AM
Take you own advice @bradleywhitford.bsky.social Schumer voted No after urging others to also vote No. And Jefferies has put out a strong statement for a No vote if the House comes back.
So read the room. Don't be a kneejerk rabble rouser.
So read the room. Don't be a kneejerk rabble rouser.
Reposted by WuWei2024
Jeffries is openly against it and Schumer had nothing to do with it. this is not a Dem leadership led or approved deal.
November 10, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Jeffries is openly against it and Schumer had nothing to do with it. this is not a Dem leadership led or approved deal.
Today is a good day to weed out the ignorant from the pragmatic and informed on BlueSky.
November 10, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Today is a good day to weed out the ignorant from the pragmatic and informed on BlueSky.
Reposted by WuWei2024
My statement on the spending legislation and Republican healthcare crisis.
November 10, 2025 at 12:08 AM
My statement on the spending legislation and Republican healthcare crisis.
You would think. But we just keep doing this over and over.
There's so much instant information dissemination without understanding legal processes, political manuvers. People would be wise to sit back before getting all riled up about incomplete information.
November 10, 2025 at 12:00 AM
You would think. But we just keep doing this over and over.