tommorris.org/posts/2026/t...
tommorris.org/posts/2026/t...
Properly adjudicating who is and is not guilty requires a criminal justice system which unfortunately needs paying for and is not nearly as sexy as an AI panopticon.
Properly adjudicating who is and is not guilty requires a criminal justice system which unfortunately needs paying for and is not nearly as sexy as an AI panopticon.
And now he’s dead.
Other websites exist.
Other websites exist.
"I still believe that X is an appropriate platform to use because I believe in freedom of speech..."
"It is incredibly important that there is a counter narrative on those platforms," she says.
Jones says he's not qualified to answer that question and he's not a spokesperson for the US administration.
We saw it with the Tories, and it's already started from the Starmerites with this idiotic dreck: archive.ph/rHoXA
Also, is rule by lawyers so bad? It's an improvement on rule by generalist Bullingdon Club tossers. Plus, unlike Parliamentarians, someone ensures lawyers actually know how the law works.
Also, is rule by lawyers so bad? It's an improvement on rule by generalist Bullingdon Club tossers. Plus, unlike Parliamentarians, someone ensures lawyers actually know how the law works.