Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
banner
nattygo.me
Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
@nattygo.me
I'm just Nat (she/her).

No, I'm the OTHER trans Natalie from Maryland.

🐣 07/04/24
💉 08/21/24
Pinned
By liking my posts, you are making a legally binding agreement to think I am pretty
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Just in case you thought this was about trans athletes. This was solely about creating a fascist and racist gender bureaucracy over what constitutes being feminine enough to be considered a woman.

They're targeting cis women who may be intersex and banning them from sport.
November 11, 2025 at 2:36 AM
If you think I am cute and want to shoot your shot, my DMs are open...
She's clocky but cute (extra frizzy hair included)
November 10, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
can you imagine if there were no women online for wil stancil to act superior to? what would he even do all day
November 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
"Are there even any-" it doesn't matter. Banning the few trans athletes isn't the point. The point, from Trump's ban on trans people in government to Britain's bathroom ban to Newsom's sports ban, is to make sure everyone knows trans women are OTHER and to act accordingly to us in their daily lives.
November 10, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
We surrendered leverage to keep open the possibility of future leverage using a tool that fundamentally favors anti-democratic parties and which we honestly weren't that great at using ourselves, because what the American people want is fidelity to house rules rather than hard-won material benefits.
November 10, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
The filibuster is so fundamentally anti-democratic that forcing the authoritarian party to kill it so that they could keep taking health care and food away from Americans was probably the cleanest out from the damn thing, yet this Cones of Duneshire-ass opposition party loves rules more than wins.
November 10, 2025 at 2:01 PM
She's clocky but cute (extra frizzy hair included)
November 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM
A Cybertruck just parked next to me and good God are those things fucking ridiculous l
November 10, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
November 9, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Tonight’s dumb napkin cartoon…
November 10, 2025 at 2:45 AM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Resign.
Democrats have been fighting for months to address America's healthcare crisis

For the millions who will lose coverage
For people with cancer who won't get the care they need
For working families who can't afford to pay $25K more a year for healthcare

We will keep fighting
November 10, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
if dems are going to do whatever their corporate donors want, then don't bother texting us for money anymore
November 10, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Democrats just swept the off-year elections -- and not just in blue states -- a resounding rejection of Republicans' authoritarian bullshit. It is an insult to Democratic voters, marketplace enrollees, and everyone who turned out on Tuesday for Schumer and Jeffries to cave.
Sounds like the squishes in the senate caucus are ready to pull the plug with no ACA changes. This is real. If you want to register your opinion you shld call yr senator in the next hour. They not only want to reopen w/nothing. They want cover from their colleagues who still want to hold out.
November 9, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Senate Democrats voting to dismantle the ACA to avoid any problems with their Thanksgiving travel is tragically on brand.
November 9, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Trump just got massively booed and flipped off by the crowd at the Commanders game.

(Video: Marisa Schultz)
November 9, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Agreeing to replace ACA tax credits with HSA bullshit would be literally worse than nothing
truly, do senate moderates wake up every day with a horse kick to the head?
"A development that appeared to break the logjam: Republicans proposed that healthcare funding be provided directly to households rather than used to pay for a 1-year extension of ACA subsidies. That involves sending federal money into FSAs instead of insurance companies" www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
November 9, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Dems backed Trump into a corner where he’s advocating for starving Americans and hemorrhaging support. If they vote to let him off the hook in exchange for nothing it’s a cataclysmic failure. I know people are in pain but insulating Republicans from political consequences is not the answer.
November 9, 2025 at 10:58 PM
The grand irony of contemporary American politics is that Republicans are concerned about being primaried but Democrats are only concerned about losing financial support from corporate donors.
November 9, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
Why does the House, the larger of the two legislative bodies, not simply eat the Senate
November 9, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
I see Will Stancil is going for the "actually the economy is just fine and you're just imagining hardship" thing again.

It's a bold strategy cotton.
Groceries are up about 30%, in fact. About the same as wages. People spend less of their income on groceries than they did five years ago.

Only about 33% of Americans rent, and of that, only a quarter are severely cost burdened (though we should build more rental housing to reduce that number).
November 9, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
November 9, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
i really hope this new whisper surge is mostly noise because a bad deal is, in fact, worse than continuing the shutdown
From what I have seen so far this does not seem like a good deal:
November 9, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
The average car loan term has never been longer and the average payment has never been higher but if you say so you're a reactionary crank.
November 9, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Reposted by Plain Simple Natalie🩵 🏳️‍⚧️
It's pretty well established through multiple high quality studies that clothes made recently wear out faster than clothes in the past did, but saying so apparently makes you a "reactionary crank".
these people are reactionary cranks literally making some of the most archetypal cranky-old-person complaints you could imagine, and it makes me feel crazy that apparently no one can see it
November 9, 2025 at 8:58 PM