Reposted by 쏨이시대
Another way of putting this is “date someone who likes you, not who is looking for someone to fill a role they’ve already carved out”
February 6, 2026 at 3:35 AM
Another way of putting this is “date someone who likes you, not who is looking for someone to fill a role they’ve already carved out”
Reposted by 쏨이시대
related, if someone is uncomfortable with you being better educated than they are, they're a loser
If I had to give one piece of relationship advice to young women who are attracted to men, it would be to only date men you think would be fine with you making more. Nothing wrong with him making more or even you being a stay at home mom. But if he'd be triggered by you making more, he's a loser.
I don't know how many girls got psyoped into thinking being strong and independent was loser shit and the tradwife life was all fun and games, but any number above zero is too many.
February 6, 2026 at 3:33 AM
related, if someone is uncomfortable with you being better educated than they are, they're a loser
Reposted by 쏨이시대
If I were a wealthy AIPAC donor, I’d think twice about trusting them with my money in the future after they aimed their fire at a moderate they were miffed at and accidentally elected the candidate most opposed to them.
Given how close the NJ-11 primary is (Mejia beating Malinowski by less than 1 point), it seems clear that Malinowski probably would have won if AIPAC hadn't done everything it could to drive liberal voters away from him, right?
February 6, 2026 at 3:35 AM
If I were a wealthy AIPAC donor, I’d think twice about trusting them with my money in the future after they aimed their fire at a moderate they were miffed at and accidentally elected the candidate most opposed to them.
Reposted by 쏨이시대
THEY can get gender affirming care, but YOU can't.
THEY can carry guns in public with impunity, but YOU can't.
THEY can assault law enforcement, but YOU can't.
THEY can beat dozens of felonies, but YOU can't.
Two countries. Two sets of laws. Two completely different ideas of who the law serves.
THEY can carry guns in public with impunity, but YOU can't.
THEY can assault law enforcement, but YOU can't.
THEY can beat dozens of felonies, but YOU can't.
Two countries. Two sets of laws. Two completely different ideas of who the law serves.
JD Vance getting lip fillers is so fucking funny
February 5, 2026 at 9:06 PM
THEY can get gender affirming care, but YOU can't.
THEY can carry guns in public with impunity, but YOU can't.
THEY can assault law enforcement, but YOU can't.
THEY can beat dozens of felonies, but YOU can't.
Two countries. Two sets of laws. Two completely different ideas of who the law serves.
THEY can carry guns in public with impunity, but YOU can't.
THEY can assault law enforcement, but YOU can't.
THEY can beat dozens of felonies, but YOU can't.
Two countries. Two sets of laws. Two completely different ideas of who the law serves.
Reposted by 쏨이시대
You have to laugh really.
Trump rows back his criticism of UK’s Chagos Islands deal
But US president says he retains right to ‘militarily secure’ American base on Diego Garcia
www.ft.com
February 5, 2026 at 8:56 PM
You have to laugh really.
So funny that we can cyberbully him into going full jocelyn wildenstein
JD Vance getting lip fillers is so fucking funny
February 5, 2026 at 8:55 PM
So funny that we can cyberbully him into going full jocelyn wildenstein
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Revenge of the manager
Job openings rate just reached its lowest level since spring 2020.
February 5, 2026 at 7:11 PM
Revenge of the manager
This entire administration is just Total Baudrillard Victory, Forever
February 5, 2026 at 8:54 PM
This entire administration is just Total Baudrillard Victory, Forever
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Reposted by 쏨이시대
there is not a single american with reading comprehension
also he recommends lolita as his favorite book on several occasions
February 5, 2026 at 7:36 PM
there is not a single american with reading comprehension
Reposted by 쏨이시대
one of the reasons Rs get away with this type of hypocritical double speak is because they do it in a way that makes reporters feel like they're savvy and aware that a lot of what Rs do is "performative" and not how they really feel so they're smart to not take the horrible behavior to seriously.
This is the same Katie Britt who sneered that Dems' reasonable demands for restraints on DHS are a "Christmas list" and blamed Dems after the ICE murder of Renee Good
paragraph 48: "In Mr. Trump’s second term, Ms. Britt has voted in line with the president 100 percent of the time."
February 5, 2026 at 8:22 PM
one of the reasons Rs get away with this type of hypocritical double speak is because they do it in a way that makes reporters feel like they're savvy and aware that a lot of what Rs do is "performative" and not how they really feel so they're smart to not take the horrible behavior to seriously.
Reposted by 쏨이시대
This is the same Katie Britt who sneered that Dems' reasonable demands for restraints on DHS are a "Christmas list" and blamed Dems after the ICE murder of Renee Good
paragraph 48: "In Mr. Trump’s second term, Ms. Britt has voted in line with the president 100 percent of the time."
February 5, 2026 at 8:12 PM
This is the same Katie Britt who sneered that Dems' reasonable demands for restraints on DHS are a "Christmas list" and blamed Dems after the ICE murder of Renee Good
The NYT loves itself a "Good reasonable GOP politician" story. Remember when they ran this playbook for Nancy Mace lmao?
paragraph 48: "In Mr. Trump’s second term, Ms. Britt has voted in line with the president 100 percent of the time."
February 5, 2026 at 8:50 PM
The NYT loves itself a "Good reasonable GOP politician" story. Remember when they ran this playbook for Nancy Mace lmao?
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Katie Britt is In On All These Horrors and NYT readers shouldn't have to wade through 3,300 words of bullshit about her deep compassion for Liam Ramos before finally encountering the tiniest hint that maybe it wasn't entirely sincere
February 5, 2026 at 7:59 PM
Katie Britt is In On All These Horrors and NYT readers shouldn't have to wade through 3,300 words of bullshit about her deep compassion for Liam Ramos before finally encountering the tiniest hint that maybe it wasn't entirely sincere
Reposted by 쏨이시대
there are 3,300 words in this article, including praise for Britt from two Democratic senators, her husband, and her mom. there are photos of her reading to children that might as well be a campaign ad.
zero criticism of her from the left.
zero criticism of her from the left.
February 5, 2026 at 7:56 PM
there are 3,300 words in this article, including praise for Britt from two Democratic senators, her husband, and her mom. there are photos of her reading to children that might as well be a campaign ad.
zero criticism of her from the left.
zero criticism of her from the left.
Reposted by 쏨이시대
paragraph 48: "In Mr. Trump’s second term, Ms. Britt has voted in line with the president 100 percent of the time."
February 5, 2026 at 7:43 PM
paragraph 48: "In Mr. Trump’s second term, Ms. Britt has voted in line with the president 100 percent of the time."
Glenn Greenwald should be harassed until the end of time for taking Trump's "I'm going to halve the Pentagon's budget" bullshit seriously and crowing about it
We do not need a $1.5 trillion dollar defense budget.
50% increase in one year?!?
breakingdefense.com/2026/02/excl...
50% increase in one year?!?
breakingdefense.com/2026/02/excl...
EXCLUSIVE: HASC chair seeking $450B for defense in reconciliation - Breaking Defense
Mike Roger, the House Armed Services Committee chief, wants to use reconciliation for a massive increase in defense spending.
breakingdefense.com
February 5, 2026 at 8:48 PM
Glenn Greenwald should be harassed until the end of time for taking Trump's "I'm going to halve the Pentagon's budget" bullshit seriously and crowing about it
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Have to imagine many in or adjacent to this administration are holding some pretty, pretty large bags.
I’m anticipating some fuckery to get these numbers back up.
I’m anticipating some fuckery to get these numbers back up.
BITCOIN EXTENDS FALL, BRIEFLY DROPS BELOW $64,000, LAST DOWN 11.5% AT $64,328
February 5, 2026 at 8:28 PM
Have to imagine many in or adjacent to this administration are holding some pretty, pretty large bags.
I’m anticipating some fuckery to get these numbers back up.
I’m anticipating some fuckery to get these numbers back up.
Oh? You mean Michael Saylor's genius Strategy (heh) of endlessly acquiring bitcoin while posting endless AI slop bitcoin shilling on social media didn't work? Strange!
So it looks like the people who said if BTC got below Saylor’s acquisition cost it would trigger a cascade of selling appear to be correct…though whether or not that actually explains BTC’s rapid crash is another question.
February 5, 2026 at 8:44 PM
Oh? You mean Michael Saylor's genius Strategy (heh) of endlessly acquiring bitcoin while posting endless AI slop bitcoin shilling on social media didn't work? Strange!
Reposted by 쏨이시대
How much of this is prediction markets sucking all the gambling money out of the crypto ecosystem?
February 5, 2026 at 8:25 PM
How much of this is prediction markets sucking all the gambling money out of the crypto ecosystem?
Reposted by 쏨이시대
1 dollar still equals 1 dollar tho
BITCOIN EXTENDS FALL, BRIEFLY DROPS BELOW $64,000, LAST DOWN 11.5% AT $64,328
February 5, 2026 at 8:22 PM
1 dollar still equals 1 dollar tho
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Also the premise is just wrong, because they didn’t really weather the previous storms, they were hugely damaging, and it’s incredible they don’t get that.
If a storm doesn’t actually sink your boat but critically damages so much that it’s effectively useless, you didn’t really “weather” the storm
If a storm doesn’t actually sink your boat but critically damages so much that it’s effectively useless, you didn’t really “weather” the storm
February 5, 2026 at 1:59 PM
Also the premise is just wrong, because they didn’t really weather the previous storms, they were hugely damaging, and it’s incredible they don’t get that.
If a storm doesn’t actually sink your boat but critically damages so much that it’s effectively useless, you didn’t really “weather” the storm
If a storm doesn’t actually sink your boat but critically damages so much that it’s effectively useless, you didn’t really “weather” the storm
Reposted by 쏨이시대
even the catholic church hides the people caught doing it, the GOP gives them public promotions
February 4, 2026 at 11:42 AM
even the catholic church hides the people caught doing it, the GOP gives them public promotions
Reposted by 쏨이시대
The republican party is literally the most openly pro pedophilia organisation I have ever seen in my life
February 4, 2026 at 11:41 AM
The republican party is literally the most openly pro pedophilia organisation I have ever seen in my life
Reposted by 쏨이시대
Yeah I mean, rich Americans have no sense of community or social responsibility
One by one, Europeans mentioned in the Epstein files who still hold political office are beginning to resign or are being forced out of office.
Meanwhile, ruled by an administration almost entirely made up of Epstein associates, the US carries on as if nothing really happened.
Meanwhile, ruled by an administration almost entirely made up of Epstein associates, the US carries on as if nothing really happened.
February 4, 2026 at 1:55 PM
Yeah I mean, rich Americans have no sense of community or social responsibility