Keith Rowley
keithrowleydata.bsky.social
Keith Rowley
@keithrowleydata.bsky.social
Data Geek. Amateur writer. Slowly restoring a 1968 Mustang Coupe and blogging the process.
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I don't want to generalize about other disciplines necessarily but for my part I can't think of a single skill that I want to test that relates to how long someone takes to complete the test.
December 2, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
This is what frustrates me so much about these articles: Propagating the narrative that large numbers of kids are faking disabilities is just going to result in a world where disabled people are *even more* scrutinized when they ask for accommodations!
My kids go to a "rich" public school. My daughter is 7 and cannot read; she is a sweet, caring, intelligent child, but if you spend a moment with her it is clear that she has ADHD an order of magnitude more serious than what you think of when you hear "ADHD." Anybody questioning her IEP can fuck off
"Rich kids are gaming disability accommodations to gain an unfair advantage" is actually very different from "America has an extra-time-on-tests problem" — and the author hasn't proved that either! Rich kids might just be more likely to be diagnosed.
December 2, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I would rather have a world where we all trust each other and accept that a few people will take advantage of it than a world where folks have to perform disability constantly in order to get the help they need. Let kids have an extra 30 minutes on the test, jesus fucking christ
December 2, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I just got an email that referred to Cyber Week instead of Cyber Monday and I cannot describe the groan I groant.
December 2, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
“I just have concerns about fairness in sport” - no, you don’t. There’s nothing fair about elite sports. You’re just looking for post hoc justification because we give you the ick
December 1, 2025 at 11:41 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
when Michael Phelps was dominating US swimming there was endless coverage of all his genetic advantages. His wingspan, the way his body processed lactic acid, on and on and on. Nobody, not one person, floated the idea of kicking him out of the sport for genetic advantages
“I just have concerns about fairness in sport” - no, you don’t. There’s nothing fair about elite sports. You’re just looking for post hoc justification because we give you the ick
December 2, 2025 at 11:36 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
This is just my opinion, but I don't think departments need to change their strategy for reading or grading student work.

Departments need a strategy for responding to harassment and attacks.
December 1, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Like, when Baudrillard describes a process wherein we lose access to the Real entirely and get trapped in an infinite discursive hall of mirrors, that's supposed to be understood to be bad! You're not supposed to do it on purpose!!
December 1, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
more seriously I *do* think this kind of thing is downstream of the worst habits in postmodernist philosophy & critical theory, where what are basically discursive word games get treated as equal to (or even privileged over) actual material reality
December 1, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Told first person from the perspective of the deputy who answers the non-emergency line at the small sheriff's office.

"Oh hi KB, how's it... wait. No. No no no NO. NO."
November 30, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
"A House With Bad Bones" and "Who Removes The Dead"

(Ya know how sometimes a silly idea springs to mind and demands to be shared with someone who'll get the joke? Well, sorry)
November 30, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Home Depot wanted holiday cheer, got a whole-ass choir calling out their partnership with ICE instead…
November 29, 2025 at 6:18 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Imo this is the real American spirit
Home Depot wanted holiday cheer, got a whole-ass choir calling out their partnership with ICE instead…
November 30, 2025 at 6:31 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I undo the top button of my shirt.
Another.
and another.
Another.

As your eyes make their way down my body
savoring each curve along the way
you see something scrawled on my skin
a little love note just for you

you lean close
and read:

'go leave reviews for your favorite indie makers, hot stuff'
a black and white photo of a woman blowing a kiss through a window .
Alt: a black and white gif of a woman blowing a kiss through a window .
media.tenor.com
November 30, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Also, big ask! Any of my mates on here trans or non-binary and Christian and wouldn't mind giving me a message? In discussing queer jesus for my diss I want to include a quote from a queer person describing the relationship between queer identities and their faith. Thanks 😊
November 30, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
If I were allowed to implement any one policy, I would implement a wealth limit: the top 0.1% of the country is only allowed to hold half as much wealth as the bottom 50%.

(Implementation would be annoying, but this is fantasy).
November 30, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
if ever a website needed to see vintage Olive Oyl demanding that Popeye blow her back out, it's Bluesky
August 31, 2023 at 8:24 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Always remember, the killer feature of LLMs is their ability to convince corporate executives they know what they're talking about.
November 30, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Headline: "AI can replace 11.7% of workforce"

Actual study: Anthropic paid MIT to use a "labor simulation tool" that said 11.7% of TASKS could be done by AI
MIT study finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce
Artificial intelligence can already replace 11.7% of the U.S. labor market, across finance, health care and professional services, according to MIT's study.
www.cnbc.com
November 29, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
a few candidates have talked about this but any Dem planning to run in 2028 should make it explicit: the next DOJ will, in fact, go after you if you’re funding this awful ballroom, or any other pay to play deals you make with this administration
Dimon on why JPMorgan Chase is not funding WH Ballroom:
We have an issue, which is anything we do, since we do a lot of contracts with governments here and around the world, we have to be very careful how anything is perceived, and also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it.
November 29, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
this guy is betting on a future with accountability for today’s crimes, so we should too
Dimon on why JPMorgan Chase is not funding WH Ballroom:
We have an issue, which is anything we do, since we do a lot of contracts with governments here and around the world, we have to be very careful how anything is perceived, and also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it.
November 29, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I think this also has to do with how executives are "big picture" people, who don't fuss over details. So maybe they care less about the issues with AI making up shit, because it doesn't have as much impact for them? While the lower ranks are expected to get the details right?
November 28, 2025 at 11:21 AM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
Fuel for my long held view that executives provide very little value and should be compensated around the middle of their org pay scale
A study by Dayforce shows 87% of executives use AI for work, compared to 57% of managers and just 27% of employees.

I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?
Execs are embracing AI more than their employees are, new research suggests
Research from HR software company Dayforce suggests that executives are leaning into AI far more than their employees.
www.businessinsider.com
November 29, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
I can't believe we're starting a new oil war in the decade of solar and EVs. We really are stuck in the 1950s, unable to evolve to tomorrow.

It would be funny if real people weren't going to be hurt over this.

All war is bad. Civilians get hurt the most. Mostly children.
November 29, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Reposted by Keith Rowley
They both have prestige law schools, and access to how many top-tier lawyers either on staff/faculty or in the alumni network. And they just... fold.
November 29, 2025 at 5:35 AM