Josh Hollinger
banner
joshhollinger.bsky.social
Josh Hollinger
@joshhollinger.bsky.social
Christian - Economist at Dordt University (Sioux Center, IA) - Labor economics, personnel economics, education economics, sports economics
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
For every year from 1994 to 2023, immigrants in the US paid more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government. Check out the latest study from Cato’s David Bier.
February 3, 2026 at 8:01 PM
The reckless and cruel histrionics of the Trump administration (DOGE, ICE, tariffs) are almost always terrible solutions to misconstrued or hyperbolized but real problems. And for conservatives, there’s always a better way to address the real problem without embodying MAGA’s caricature of the left.
Take off their masks. End their immunities. Limit their jurisdiction. Restrain their tactics. All of this can be done through legislation without inhibiting humane immigration enforcement. If it’s done correctly, legislative reform can lead to greater accountability across the whole of government.
Opinion | ‘We Are Creating the Conditions for a Catastrophe.’ Three Columnists on Minneapolis.
www.nytimes.com
January 26, 2026 at 5:45 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
“We will never become a better or more united country if we cannot point to indecent actions taken and statements made by those we agree with politically and say, ‘This is wrong. This is something that decent human beings do not do.’”
December 17, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
NEW: If successful, the H-1B change would severely damage the most important channel for US entry by workers with advanced degrees & specialized knowledge, causing profound & widespread harm to Americans’ incomes & job opportunities.
By @mclem.org:
New US curb on high-skill immigrant workers ignores evidence of its likely harms
President Donald Trump on Friday ordered an unprecedented new restriction on lawful immigration to the US by high-skill workers. Starting Sunday, new applications for H-1B visas required payment of an...
www.piie.com
September 22, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
The argument is: We're all meant to sacrifice a bit, so that tariffs can help rebuild American manufacturing. Let's ask American manufacturers whether they're helping.
September 2, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
I expand on why I--like just about every economist and wonk I know--believes that EJ Antoni is a terrible pick for BLS Commission.

Shout outs to Alan Cole, Stan Veuger and if more space would have called out dozens more. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/13/o...
Opinion | Why Economists Are Worried About Trump’s B.L.S. Changes
Most of us just accept that government economic data is the best possible estimate of the economy. That could change, and that would be bad for all of us.
www.nytimes.com
August 14, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner after a weak jobs report drew condemnation from economists across the political spectrum who were worried about the politicization of government data. His choice of replacement has only added to those concerns. #EconSky
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/12/b...
Trump’s Pick to Lead Labor Data Agency Adds to Fears of Political Interference
www.nytimes.com
August 12, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
Powell stressed today that the Fed's decisions will be based on how the economic data performs in coming months.
One problem: That data may be becoming less reliable.
My story on the BLS's latest cuts to CPI data collection:
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/30/b... #EconSky
Cuts to Data Collection May Erode Reliability of Economic Statistics
www.nytimes.com
July 30, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
We were lucky enough to have our YouGov/The Economist poll in field when the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. You can see the partisan realignment in real time
June 27, 2025 at 11:33 AM
This study finds that removing tenure protection (requiring performance review every five years) didn’t increase faculty productivity for tenured profs, but did drive away more productive profs (in retention and hiring).

A few comments:
May 23, 2025 at 6:43 PM
The debate on who benefits from changes always has to be contextualized in an understanding of the status quo (a progressive tax system).

But if we want to tax the rich, we could maintain a lower cap on the SALT deduction… it’s also the only tax hike that makes political sense for Republicans.
NYT: “.. People making between about $51,000 and $17,000 could lose about $700 on average in after-tax income ..

“By contrast, the top 0.1 percent, including those with incomes over $4.3 million, would gain on average more than $389,000 ..”

@tonyromm.bsky.social
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/16/u...
May 19, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Just making an official note-to-self prediction here for the end of 2025:
1) the federal government deficit won’t decrease (at least $1.9 trillion)
2) unemployment rate increases to at least 5%
3) inflation rate increases to at least 4%

i.e. economy gets worse
May 9, 2025 at 7:20 PM
May 1, 2025 at 5:32 PM
There’s a lot of overlap between political strategy centered on negotiation and political strategy centered on accumulating power.
April 9, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
Rand Paul: "The whole [tariffs] debate is so fundamentally backwards & upside down. It's based on a fallacy & the fallacy is this: that somehow in a trade, someone must lose. That somehow when you trade with someone, someone is taking advantage of you... I have a trade deficit with my grocery store"
April 8, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
The main effect of tariff insanity:

Uncertainty poisoning supply networks, degrading a lot of relationships at once.

That scar tissue will linger for a long time.

1/
April 7, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Liberation Day means freedom from access to goods and services and freedom from our consumeristic desires. Now that’s innovative economic policy.
Trump Calmly Reminds Nation That Desire The Root Of All Suffering
WASHINGTON—Seeking to reassure the public after his latest tariffs sent both U.S. and international markets into free fall, President Donald Trump calmly reminded the nation Thursday that desire is th...
theonion.com
April 5, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
They claim these are "reciprocal tariffs." But their actions do not follow any known definition of those words. It's a day of great escalation, not retaliation. What do you think the likelihood of a recession is now?

youtu.be/vhaNwCUmcUc?...
Trump Broke Centuries-Old Tariff
YouTube video by Christopher Clarke
youtu.be
April 3, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
WH has now confirmed: this is insane nypost.com/2025/04/02/u...
April 3, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
I'm a fiscal conservative, so why am I so down on DOGE? I had a chat with Jessica Reidl from the Manhattan Institute about DOGE as "spending cut theater." It's mainly serious about malice. It's not serious about the budget. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/o...
Opinion | Elon Musk and the Useless Spending-Cut Theater of DOGE
The columnist David French speaks with a fellow fiscal conservative about what the Department of Government Efficiency should actually be doing.
www.nytimes.com
March 5, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Great article here. In short: robust supply chains and domestic supply chains aren’t necessarily the same thing. (Free trade is eggstra nice when bird flu hits the US)
Of course I wrote this up: "The Trump Administration’s Eggstremely Interesting Fix for High Prices" www.cato.org/blog/trump-a... via @cato.org
February 26, 2025 at 11:52 PM
As a professor, there’s hardly a belief more foundational than “there IS something to study”. The war of “common sense” against expertise rages on.
REPORTER: Would you direct agencies to study the impact tariffs would have on prices in the US?

TRUMP: No. There's nothing to study. It's gonna go well.
February 13, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Reposted by Josh Hollinger
President Trump has opened the throttle on blowing through apparent legal limits, often with no clear public explanation for how their actions could be consistent with the rule of law. Here are some examples of the administration’s defiance of statutes. nyti.ms/4aKnKRP
February 5, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Important points here about the ineffectiveness and delusion of DOGE’s efforts to cut government spending. I’m more concerned about the “it’s also wildly illegal” part though.
“Why aren’t you cheering Trump & DOGE? I thought you wanted spending and deficit cuts!"

Here's my long ranty answer posted on the other site...
February 5, 2025 at 3:14 AM