Jenz
jenzunleashed.bsky.social
Jenz
@jenzunleashed.bsky.social
Reposted by Jenz
The full spiked 60 Minutes CECOT package, clean & subtitled. 1/5
December 23, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Reposted by Jenz
“[T]here has been persistent chatter circulating in Democratic circles that Future Forward—the main super PAC backing Democrats, which brought in $613 million from donors last year—was pressuring the DNC to not make them look bad.” open.substack.com/pub/thebulwa...
An Autopsy Report of the DNC’s Autopsy Report
Who killed the committee’s look back at the 2024 election—and why?
open.substack.com
December 22, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Reposted by Jenz
Why decline all these chances to defend feminism? Because to participate would be accepting the premise that our rights and humanity are up for debate in the first place.

Once you’ve conceded that it’s reasonable to ask whether women’s equality was a mistake, you’ve already lost.
December 20, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Reposted by Jenz
The Chad “Here’s a point by point refutation of this article written from my person experience in policy and government”

Versus

The Virgin “This proprietary equation I made up says you’re wrong”
when we said “defer electoral strategy to the actual politicians running for actual offices” we meant “after calculating wins above replacement somehow”
December 20, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Reposted by Jenz
And finally, the assault on Section 230. This is the endgame for independent speech.

If you repeal 230, you don’t hurt Google or Meta—they have the lawyers to survive. You destroy the small forums, the independent blogs, the dissenters. You make the cost of speaking the truth too high to bear.
How Democrats’ Attack On Section 230 Plays Right Into Trump’s Censorial Plans
Like clockwork, lawmakers are once again rallying around the idea of eliminating Section 230. That Republicans are leading this charge is hardly surprising—repealing Section 230 is explicitly laid …
www.techdirt.com
December 14, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Reposted by Jenz
🙄 Sen. Mark Kelly has been spending spam texts asking for money to take on Trump and Hegseth’s department of defense’s investigation targeting him less than 24 hours after he voted to approve a $900 billion defense authorization budget for a pentagon run by Trump and Hegseth.

Cynical and gross. 🤮
December 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Reposted by Jenz
ICYMI here are the Senate Dems who voted to pass a $900 billon defense bill to fund a Pentagon led by Pete Hegseth which included its “leaders” such as Schumer, Durbin, Reed, Klobuchar among others.

www.senate.gov/legislative/...
December 17, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Reposted by Jenz
The "poverty penalty."
Excellent points.
December 18, 2025 at 1:47 PM
Reposted by Jenz
I'm sorry, but he's actually doing The Hunger Games?

What are we doing here, folks?
Trump announces an "unprecedented four-day athletic event" with "one young man and one young woman from each state and territory"
December 18, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Reposted by Jenz
Democrats don't need to moderate to win. Not if you know anything about how actual voters make decisions. newrepublic.com/article/2042...
A New Report Reveals the Real Reason Democrats Lost in 2024
It wasn’t because Biden voters shifted to Trump—but because so many of them stayed home. Here’s how Democrats can motivate them once more.
newrepublic.com
December 11, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by Jenz
BREAKING: The Democratic National Committee will NOT release its long-awaited autopsy on Trump's 2024 win. The report is completed but Dem leaders decided it could distract from their winning streak, so it will remain secret. Not good.

Details here:
newrepublic.com/article/2045...
Dem Leaders Decide to Bury Damning Report on Why Trump Won in 2024
The Democratic National Committee has completed its long-awaited analysis on what went wrong in the 2024 campaign. But in a move that will attract intense criticism, it’s keeping the findings secret.
newrepublic.com
December 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Reposted by Jenz
General rule of thumb: if a single Republican is willing to vote yes, you should probably vote no. If more than 10 Republicans are willing to vote yes, you should definitely vote no.
December 13, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Reposted by Jenz
I’m sorry are these people literally ever going to talk about the murdering and raping and torturing and kidnapping?
Democrats target Trump's affordability crisis in 2026 offensive
Making America affordable again will run through nearly every part of their effort.
www.axios.com
December 6, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Reposted by Jenz
It was a giant miscalculation by the people around Biden to simply ignore DJT and try to move on.

IMO People voted for Biden to have DJT held accountable for his actual, verifiable crimes.

They didnt show back up in 2024 because DOJ didnt deliver.
December 5, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Reposted by Jenz
"If you believe a Palestinian child is equal in dignity and worth to an Israeli or American child, it is no longer possible to support this Israeli government while hiding behind platitudes about peace." www.nytimes.com/2025/12/01/o...
Opinion | This Is the Story of How the Democrats Blew It on Gaza
www.nytimes.com
December 1, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Reposted by Jenz
From the gift link feed
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/24/u...
Chuck Schumer Faces Pushback From a ‘Fight Club’ of Senate Democrats
www.nytimes.com
November 25, 2025 at 3:46 AM
Reposted by Jenz
Holy shit! This is what I'm talkin' about. David Clayton is running for congress in North Carolina's District 5 against MAGA Republican Virginia Foxx — and this is how he introduced himself. 🙌💪👏✊️👇
November 21, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Reposted by Jenz
🎯🎯Must read piece on how John Roberts created the conditions for Trump’s rise and has enabled his criminality at every turn by @pemalevy.bsky.social and @ariberman.bsky.social www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
This is all John Roberts’ fault
Trump owes his corrupt and abusive reign to one man.
www.motherjones.com
November 20, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Reposted by Jenz
We spent a year investigating billionaires for @washingtonpost.com.

We found: the wealthiest 100 Americans gave $1.1 billion to influence the 2024 elections — 140x more than they did in 2000. And almost all of that giving boosted Republicans.

washingtonpost.com/politics/int...
November 21, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Reposted by Jenz
Reposted by Jenz
He said "Amen" straight into the drop

Lmao Pope Leo threw a rave for an archbishop's 75th birthday this is kind of incredible
November 20, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Reposted by Jenz
November 21, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Reposted by Jenz
In culture war backlash, Democrats sweep school boards
In culture war backlash, Democrats sweep school boards
The party recruited and invested in school board races to oust Republicans. It worked.
dlvr.it
November 21, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Reposted by Jenz
This is blatantly, undeniably true and has been for a long time, and it is cooking people's brains to hang out there and think it's not true. Regardless of if you like this place as an alternative or not. Musk puts his thumb heavily on the scale because your feed there is his personal plaything.
If you're trying to convince your friends to spend time on Bluesky rather than X, maybe show them this. X is not "the public town square" or about "free speech." It's "just what Elon Musk wants you to see." If you see stuff he doesn't like he'll step in to make sure you don't see it for long.
If you scroll on X, you are only being shown what Elon wants you to see. If you create content on X, no one will see it unless Elon wants them to.
November 21, 2025 at 2:01 AM