If a work that resonates so much can be considered "objectively" bad, what's the point of "objective" judgment?
If a work that resonates so much can be considered "objectively" bad, what's the point of "objective" judgment?
Objectively, the anatomy was incorrect. Objectively, it's not what the artist was trying to draw.
A fool would say that makes it "objectively" bad art.
Objectively, the anatomy was incorrect. Objectively, it's not what the artist was trying to draw.
A fool would say that makes it "objectively" bad art.
Fusca amarelo = pescotapa no amigo
Fusca verde = beijo de língua no amigo
Fuscão preto = sexo no pelo no amigo
O convite acontece após Chico Moedas participar de um podcast ao lado de Jones Manoel e compartilhar sua ideologia política
t.co/x4WsCouUA1
daí já é problema dele de ser burro mesmo, não tem o que fazer
daí já é problema dele de ser burro mesmo, não tem o que fazer
Because I simply do not want my initial reaction to art to be one of suspicion and scrutiny, AI slop is fundamentally damaging my relationship to art and artistry, and I am deeply resentful that it is forcing me to be guarded when I should be wowed.
Because I simply do not want my initial reaction to art to be one of suspicion and scrutiny, AI slop is fundamentally damaging my relationship to art and artistry, and I am deeply resentful that it is forcing me to be guarded when I should be wowed.