> in socialism
> as an institution
> there should be no benefits over other relationships and living styles for monogamous couples over everyone else
Ideally this would happen in socialism where private property isn’t a thing so that doesn’t matter either
That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania.
Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
> in socialism
> as an institution
> there should be no benefits over other relationships and living styles for monogamous couples over everyone else
Yes, you can read it here
www.npr.org/2019/08/22/7...
Yes, you can read it here
www.npr.org/2019/08/22/7...
And I did it because that’s how science works.
And I did it because that’s how science works.
“Poverty is not real”
TRUMP: More than anything else, it's a con job by the Democrats. Are you ready? Costs are way down.
“Poverty is not real”
They also must make eye contact with and wave to or greet the customer.
If they’re within four feet, the employee should ask how the customer’s day is going or if they need help."
🙄 Won't stop the boycott, y'all.
As he put it, they want to create “a million little Gazas.”
www.merip.org/2025/11/the-...
As he put it, they want to create “a million little Gazas.”
www.merip.org/2025/11/the-...
I somewhat agree with you about political messaging, but that’s not what I’m trying to do.
PEOPLE. ARE. STARVING. Can they eat the rules of procedure? No? THEN FEED THEM.
The purpose of a system is what it does. And if the rules of procedure allow people to starve, they're wrong.
PEOPLE. ARE. STARVING. Can they eat the rules of procedure? No? THEN FEED THEM.
The purpose of a system is what it does. And if the rules of procedure allow people to starve, they're wrong.
Feed. Them.
Feed. Them.