Ben Harris-Roxas
banner
benhr.bsky.social
Ben Harris-Roxas
@benhr.bsky.social

Researcher and educator from Sydney, Australia. You’ll usually find me on the forgotten parts of the web.

https://unsw.to/ben_hr
https://harrisroxashealth.com

Public Health 27%
Medicine 16%

Do you like this, as an M.O.?

The aphids are being resistant bastards this year.

A lot of groups get unfairly blamed for the world’s ills but few have the courage to name the real problem: aphids and scale.

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

50 years since the Dismissal.
My @smh @theage cartoon.

You don’t have to go as far as Saturn MORE LATER

This ridiculous post (the answer is clearly his own tariffs) made me learn about “Boxed Beef”, a fascinating turn in intensive beef production that reminds me of what has happened to poultry. Sci-fi authors who thought we’d be eating vat protein got it wrong.

I was reading that before Hitler, it was common to refer to authoritarian power-grabbers as “Pharaoh”, I guess because of the shared biblical touchstone. Really makes you wonder where Ramses III would have been on the political compass.

Beautiful morning on the Goods Line

Is it really the sole superpower any more? That status relies on force projection and fiat dominance, and both seem a bit crumbly?

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

I think more people should be scandalised that the ATO is using private debt collectors. Those debt collectors are not usually the most scrupulous entities around.

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

Takes all types! It was definitely not for me.

I’m afraid you weren’t the preferred vampire for the position.

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

I actually can't get enough of these solidarity stories of young protest movements across the world www.economist.com/asia/2025/10...

Not social credit, SOCIAL SHAME! I think we need to pool all the declined or ignored invitations to review and make a public list 🤣😭

In more direct response to your question, perhaps a journal’s mentoring efforts should be focused on developing better reviewers, which invariably leads to better authors?

None of it is easily solved.

It’s not even manageable, which means it’s less of a wicked problem and more akin to collapse.

Reposted by Joanna Tai

Before COVID that figure was more like 6-8.

People need to slow down, submit less crap, contribute to peer review. If you don’t there should be stigma and censure. The system is broken but so are the hard-working volunteers who are papering over its cracks.

I think there needs to be explicit requirements to do high quality reviews *before* you’re considered for publishing yourself. There’s a massive amount of AI slop being submitted to journals I have editorial roles with, and even for the better stuff I now frequently have to ask 20+ reviewers.
Back in my day, AI used to stand for Adobe Illustrator! And we hated that, too!
In 2008, Google created an ad-powered wiki encyclopedia called Knol, seen as a "Wikipedia killer" amid its highly-publicized launch. And the Wikimedia Foundation gave an unbothered response that I quite like: "the more good free content, the better for the world." Anyway Knol instantly flopped

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

If the Productivity Commission had any credibility to provide advice on either copyright or cultural policy in the first place, it has squandered it.
Sure, tech giants can't train AI on copyright content for now, but the battle isn't over
www.crikey.com.au

NotebookLM is the best we can hope for

Eddington was an incredible documentary.

Early Teams Meeting!

Very sorry to hear it

Reposted by Ben Harris‐Roxas

wow that’s pretty hot hey

I wonder to myself, why?