@teco1952.bsky.social
Indiana University Grad, Nam Vet hardcore Dem
Reposted
Clearly the order is to take no prisoners. Which itself is also a war crime
December 5, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Clearly the order is to take no prisoners. Which itself is also a war crime
Reposted
To this administration walking while brown is apparently potential death penalty territory
December 5, 2025 at 2:04 AM
To this administration walking while brown is apparently potential death penalty territory
Reposted
There were penalties, including prison time, for some US servicemembers over Abu Ghraib. Where there were no penalties were those involved in "enhanced interrogations" during the Bush Administration, deemed as torture by the Obama Administration.
December 5, 2025 at 3:16 AM
There were penalties, including prison time, for some US servicemembers over Abu Ghraib. Where there were no penalties were those involved in "enhanced interrogations" during the Bush Administration, deemed as torture by the Obama Administration.
Reposted
They watched for 41 minutes and made such a mounterous decision. There was no fog of war. There was no war. They saw no drugs. They were no where near US waters.
Just 2 men struggling with an overturned boat.
Just 2 men struggling with an overturned boat.
December 5, 2025 at 1:54 AM
They watched for 41 minutes and made such a mounterous decision. There was no fog of war. There was no war. They saw no drugs. They were no where near US waters.
Just 2 men struggling with an overturned boat.
Just 2 men struggling with an overturned boat.
Reposted
it is not a war crime, we are not at war.
it’s cold-blooded murder.
it’s cold-blooded murder.
December 5, 2025 at 3:16 AM
it is not a war crime, we are not at war.
it’s cold-blooded murder.
it’s cold-blooded murder.
Reposted
Seems pretty clear there were people in the room screaming "hit them again" while others in the room knew it was a war crime.
December 5, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Seems pretty clear there were people in the room screaming "hit them again" while others in the room knew it was a war crime.
Reposted
Double-tap is very misleading here, it implies strikes in quick succession. They scratched their loathsome chins about it for 41 minutes, watching these two guys struggle to overturn their wrecked boat, before deciding nah, hit 'em again
December 5, 2025 at 1:46 AM
Double-tap is very misleading here, it implies strikes in quick succession. They scratched their loathsome chins about it for 41 minutes, watching these two guys struggle to overturn their wrecked boat, before deciding nah, hit 'em again
Reposted
#Felon47 has issued over TEN TIMES as many “ pardons “ as he did in his entire four-year first term.
That’s a lot of criminals released on our streets.
#RemoveTrump
That’s a lot of criminals released on our streets.
#RemoveTrump
December 4, 2025 at 6:21 PM
#Felon47 has issued over TEN TIMES as many “ pardons “ as he did in his entire four-year first term.
That’s a lot of criminals released on our streets.
#RemoveTrump
That’s a lot of criminals released on our streets.
#RemoveTrump
Reposted
Reposted
By the way, the real drug traffickers aren’t on the boats. Those are just mules getting paid a few bucks. Trump doesn’t go after the real kingpins, he either leaves them alone or pardons them.
December 4, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Reposted
'Narcoterrorism' is understood to be the attempts of narcotics traffickers to influence the policies of a government or a society. These saps being killed are just pawns in a rich mans game, nothing more.
Throwing the word 'terrorist' at something to justify murder is a gaslight.
Throwing the word 'terrorist' at something to justify murder is a gaslight.
December 4, 2025 at 4:10 PM
'Narcoterrorism' is understood to be the attempts of narcotics traffickers to influence the policies of a government or a society. These saps being killed are just pawns in a rich mans game, nothing more.
Throwing the word 'terrorist' at something to justify murder is a gaslight.
Throwing the word 'terrorist' at something to justify murder is a gaslight.
Reposted
Why does it have to be either or? We can push for two things at once. Epstein files and no war crimes!
December 4, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Why does it have to be either or? We can push for two things at once. Epstein files and no war crimes!
Reposted
Killing defenseless people clinging to wreckage at sea appears to be what it takes to get Epstein pushed into the background.
Success, as far as Trump's concerned.
Success, as far as Trump's concerned.
December 4, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Killing defenseless people clinging to wreckage at sea appears to be what it takes to get Epstein pushed into the background.
Success, as far as Trump's concerned.
Success, as far as Trump's concerned.
Reposted
Murdering people without due process for an alleged criminal offence THAT IS NOT A CAPITAL OFFENCE IN AMERICA.
There is nothing right about this.
Then
Murdering two defenceless people who were no conceivable threat to ANYONE for the hell of it.
THERE HAS TO BE CONSEQUENCES.
There is nothing right about this.
Then
Murdering two defenceless people who were no conceivable threat to ANYONE for the hell of it.
THERE HAS TO BE CONSEQUENCES.
December 4, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Murdering people without due process for an alleged criminal offence THAT IS NOT A CAPITAL OFFENCE IN AMERICA.
There is nothing right about this.
Then
Murdering two defenceless people who were no conceivable threat to ANYONE for the hell of it.
THERE HAS TO BE CONSEQUENCES.
There is nothing right about this.
Then
Murdering two defenceless people who were no conceivable threat to ANYONE for the hell of it.
THERE HAS TO BE CONSEQUENCES.
Reposted
Absolutely, but for Hegseth to say beforehand max lethality free from “politically correct” (well established rules) rules of engagement makes this premeditated. He said he would ignore the Geneva convention rules & ignore American values.
He should be punished to extreme for this.
He should be punished to extreme for this.
December 4, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Absolutely, but for Hegseth to say beforehand max lethality free from “politically correct” (well established rules) rules of engagement makes this premeditated. He said he would ignore the Geneva convention rules & ignore American values.
He should be punished to extreme for this.
He should be punished to extreme for this.
Reposted
To pretend the US hasn’t done things like this before would be foolish, but that doesn’t mean this should not be prosecuted now, and in the future, by whomever allows it to happen.
December 4, 2025 at 4:03 PM
To pretend the US hasn’t done things like this before would be foolish, but that doesn’t mean this should not be prosecuted now, and in the future, by whomever allows it to happen.
Reposted
Right? Admiral Warcrimes can't just say "I was only following orders" . He was apparently, gleefully in on it . #Nuremberg.
December 4, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Right? Admiral Warcrimes can't just say "I was only following orders" . He was apparently, gleefully in on it . #Nuremberg.
Reposted
he obeyed an illegal order and is claiming the two continued the operation, while clinging.
he is guilty and the military seems to be complicit...
and until they decide otherwise, rump is not removable, imho
he is guilty and the military seems to be complicit...
and until they decide otherwise, rump is not removable, imho
December 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM
he obeyed an illegal order and is claiming the two continued the operation, while clinging.
he is guilty and the military seems to be complicit...
and until they decide otherwise, rump is not removable, imho
he is guilty and the military seems to be complicit...
and until they decide otherwise, rump is not removable, imho
Reposted
OVER THERE>>>>>> PIPE BOMBER!!!!! LOOK!!!!!!!!
December 4, 2025 at 4:04 PM
OVER THERE>>>>>> PIPE BOMBER!!!!! LOOK!!!!!!!!
Reposted
I want to know what Trump knew and when he knew it. They all need to be held accountable for this bullshit
December 4, 2025 at 4:36 PM
I want to know what Trump knew and when he knew it. They all need to be held accountable for this bullshit