@swiede.bsky.social
Reposted
The House Oversight Committee says there has been an “intense White House cover-up” of the Epstein files.
In other news, water is wet, the Pope is Catholic, and bears shit in the woods.
In other news, water is wet, the Pope is Catholic, and bears shit in the woods.
November 21, 2025 at 7:32 PM
The House Oversight Committee says there has been an “intense White House cover-up” of the Epstein files.
In other news, water is wet, the Pope is Catholic, and bears shit in the woods.
In other news, water is wet, the Pope is Catholic, and bears shit in the woods.
Reposted
Brooks, who positions himself as the great empath, issues a cynical dismissal of the Epstein story and defense of elites, ignoring the victims and his accomplices.
The Epstein Story? Count Me Out. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
The Epstein Story? Count Me Out. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
Opinion | The Epstein Story? Count Me Out.
www.nytimes.com
November 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Brooks, who positions himself as the great empath, issues a cynical dismissal of the Epstein story and defense of elites, ignoring the victims and his accomplices.
The Epstein Story? Count Me Out. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
The Epstein Story? Count Me Out. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
Reposted
If there are no consequences to the "president" for threatening political opponents with death or being cruel to reporters, then why is it even news? Just so we can all be sad about it?
November 20, 2025 at 8:29 PM
If there are no consequences to the "president" for threatening political opponents with death or being cruel to reporters, then why is it even news? Just so we can all be sad about it?
Reposted
X has changed their policy and now you can see where the accounts are based.
Here’s an “influencer from Texas”
Here’s an “influencer from Texas”
November 21, 2025 at 6:36 PM
X has changed their policy and now you can see where the accounts are based.
Here’s an “influencer from Texas”
Here’s an “influencer from Texas”
Reposted
Elizabeth Warren on Colbert's show: "We don't think one corporation or one man named David Ellison should be able to buy up all the shows and buy up all the sports and buy up all the news and decide who watches what and I'm gonna stay in that fight."
November 21, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Elizabeth Warren on Colbert's show: "We don't think one corporation or one man named David Ellison should be able to buy up all the shows and buy up all the sports and buy up all the news and decide who watches what and I'm gonna stay in that fight."
Reposted
An uphill battle is one worth fighting! Thank you Montana cartoonist JC Moore! Love the ☀️ Join us at montanaplan.com
November 21, 2025 at 2:31 PM
An uphill battle is one worth fighting! Thank you Montana cartoonist JC Moore! Love the ☀️ Join us at montanaplan.com
Reposted
Just to review, in the last week the President of the United States:
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
November 20, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Just to review, in the last week the President of the United States:
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
Reposted
After facing a stunning defeat earlier this week, the Texas gerrymandering case heads to the Supreme Court.
This decision will force Chief Justice John Roberts and the other Republican-appointed justices to pick between enforcing the rules they created and their evident loyalty to the GOP.
This decision will force Chief Justice John Roberts and the other Republican-appointed justices to pick between enforcing the rules they created and their evident loyalty to the GOP.
The Texas gerrymandering case is a test of the Supreme Court's integrity
Do the justices have any rules they won't let Republicans break?
www.motherjones.com
November 21, 2025 at 7:43 PM
After facing a stunning defeat earlier this week, the Texas gerrymandering case heads to the Supreme Court.
This decision will force Chief Justice John Roberts and the other Republican-appointed justices to pick between enforcing the rules they created and their evident loyalty to the GOP.
This decision will force Chief Justice John Roberts and the other Republican-appointed justices to pick between enforcing the rules they created and their evident loyalty to the GOP.
Reposted
Reposted
Socialism is what they called public power.
Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
—Harry Truman, 1952
Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
—Harry Truman, 1952
November 21, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Socialism is what they called public power.
Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
—Harry Truman, 1952
Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
—Harry Truman, 1952
Reposted
This piece reads as if it's only a matter of time before we find David Brooks in the Epstein emails.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
Opinion | The Epstein Story? Count Me Out.
www.nytimes.com
November 21, 2025 at 1:41 PM
This piece reads as if it's only a matter of time before we find David Brooks in the Epstein emails.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/o...
Reposted
just a normal day in america where my first story filed is about the president calling for the execution of multiple members of congress
November 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM
just a normal day in america where my first story filed is about the president calling for the execution of multiple members of congress
Reposted
Mark Kelly: "He's talked about sending troops into more cities, he's talked about invoking the Insurrection Act. You don't have to go too far back to his 1st administration when he went to his Sec Def & said, 'Can't we just shoot these protesters in the legs.' That is an example of an illegal order"
November 21, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Mark Kelly: "He's talked about sending troops into more cities, he's talked about invoking the Insurrection Act. You don't have to go too far back to his 1st administration when he went to his Sec Def & said, 'Can't we just shoot these protesters in the legs.' That is an example of an illegal order"
Reposted
Reposted
Reposted
Reposted
Ellison: Today, you should never get a Republican AG, because they’re not your AG. They’re Leonard Leo’s AG. They’re Donald Trump’s AG. But they are not your AG. They’re not Louisiana’s AG. They’re not Mississippi’s AG. They’re beholden to others.
November 21, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Ellison: Today, you should never get a Republican AG, because they’re not your AG. They’re Leonard Leo’s AG. They’re Donald Trump’s AG. But they are not your AG. They’re not Louisiana’s AG. They’re not Mississippi’s AG. They’re beholden to others.
Reposted
The first independent poll of this election has me tied for first place!
November 21, 2025 at 3:32 AM
The first independent poll of this election has me tied for first place!
Reposted
This is not a man who should be President of the United States.
November 20, 2025 at 3:02 PM
This is not a man who should be President of the United States.
Reposted
Our leaders and countless patriots have a good reason for publicly reminding US soldiers to refuse illegal orders. Why it's a controversy. It's because many of our soldiers have been obeying illegal orders.
Let's keep that foremost in mind
Let's keep that foremost in mind
November 21, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Our leaders and countless patriots have a good reason for publicly reminding US soldiers to refuse illegal orders. Why it's a controversy. It's because many of our soldiers have been obeying illegal orders.
Let's keep that foremost in mind
Let's keep that foremost in mind
Reposted
Jim, let me explain this to you in terms clearer than young men being abused, right under your nose.
You were in contact with the President and other architects of January 6th. Of course your phone records were part of the investigation. 😒
You were in contact with the President and other architects of January 6th. Of course your phone records were part of the investigation. 😒
November 21, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Jim, let me explain this to you in terms clearer than young men being abused, right under your nose.
You were in contact with the President and other architects of January 6th. Of course your phone records were part of the investigation. 😒
You were in contact with the President and other architects of January 6th. Of course your phone records were part of the investigation. 😒
Reposted
Kelly: "I never expected after serving 25 years in the Navy flying combat missions over Iraq and Kuwait, flying the Space Shuttle, that now I've got to worry about my personal safety and that of my wife, Gabby Giffords, who was already nearly assassinated, because of something the president said."
November 21, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Kelly: "I never expected after serving 25 years in the Navy flying combat missions over Iraq and Kuwait, flying the Space Shuttle, that now I've got to worry about my personal safety and that of my wife, Gabby Giffords, who was already nearly assassinated, because of something the president said."
Reposted
Even as we talk about a new party for liberals/progressives, I think we should have another for people who are party “INO”s - people who run on a party’s platform to get elected, only to vote against them Every. Single. Time.
And I nominate Fetterman as the inaugural member.
And I nominate Fetterman as the inaugural member.
November 21, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Even as we talk about a new party for liberals/progressives, I think we should have another for people who are party “INO”s - people who run on a party’s platform to get elected, only to vote against them Every. Single. Time.
And I nominate Fetterman as the inaugural member.
And I nominate Fetterman as the inaugural member.
Reposted
completely outside of politics, this is so charming
November 21, 2025 at 4:26 PM
completely outside of politics, this is so charming