Daniel E. Weeks
banner
statgendan.bsky.social
Daniel E. Weeks
@statgendan.bsky.social
Statistical geneticist. Professor of Human Genetics and Biostatistics at the University of Pittsburgh. Assiduously meticulous.
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Well, it's official. #UNL Chancellor Bennett submitted his final proposal and it includes eliminating the #statistics department. budgetprocess.unl.edu/final-budget...

Guess it's time to go look for jobs. Anyone looking for a couple of very talented #datavis researchers?
Final Budget Reduction Plan | Budget Process | Nebraska
budgetprocess.unl.edu
November 10, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
This is out now:

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Association between lactase persistence and height in the past (indicating people with the persistence allele were better nourished by drinking milk than those without it) provides a potential explanation for why it was under strong selection.
November 10, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
You categorised patients as responders or non responders by dichotomising a change from baseline?
You triple criminal!
November 8, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
PSA for people with NIH grant periods starting January 1st (including most NIGMS MIRAs): your RPPR is due Saturday, but they haven’t sent out the usual automated reminders, presumably due to the shutdown
November 11, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
#TodayinHistory #dataviz #OTD 📊
📅Nov 10, 1954 John Backus published the formal proposal for FORTRAN, the first high level language for computing

🔗 bit.ly/3DQnswH
It was proprietary to IBM. The 1st FORTRAN compiler was completed 1955-56.

Who remembers the shift from that to FORTRAN IV?
November 11, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
As an exercise, one could consider exactly what citation counts are good for, given that quite possibly _nobody_ noticed that citations of their own articles were being under-reported (or massively over-reported) over 14 years and possibly millions of authors.
Oops. Ooooooooooooops.

I do hope that nobody has been given or denied a job/promotion based on their SpringerNature citation counts in the past 15 years.

arxiv.org/pdf/2511.01675

h/t @nathlarigaldie.bsky.social
November 8, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
When I was in graduate school my life and carreer were completely transformed by a seminar I attended at Stanford by Dr. Hamilton Smith. In the talk he discussed how TIGR was sequencing whole genomes of organisms. Here is a scan of P1 of my notes. 1/n
November 11, 2025 at 5:42 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
(Non-identifiability is the equivalent of looking at an equation 'A x B = 20' and claiming you know exactly what value A and B are.)
November 9, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Theorem of the Day (November 9, 2025) : Netto’s Conjecture (Dixon’s Theorem)
Source : Theorem of the Day / Robin Whitty
pdf : buff.ly/eWQ4C4N
notes : buff.ly/ElCux2H

#mathematics #maths #math #theorem
November 9, 2025 at 11:00 AM
“changes in statistical significance are often not themselves statistically significant. … even large changes in significance levels can correspond to small, nonsignificant changes in the underlying quantities.”

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...

#Statistics
The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant
It is common to summarize statistical comparisons by declarations of statistical significance or nonsignificance. Here we discuss one problem with such declarations, namely that changes in statisti...
www.tandfonline.com
November 9, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
In a field where evidence suggests that a high proportion of papers have serious flaws, a database of "potentially important" papers which appear *not* to have serious flaws might be useful, as well as identifying those that do.
November 9, 2025 at 10:36 AM
In 1982, I was in the Jackson Laboratory Research Training Program. As part of the program, we got to attend the Short Course lectures. At the end of one lecture by a young researcher, this old guy very viciously and aggressively lit into him. Turned out that the nasty old guy was Jim Watson.
November 8, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
A fantastic piece. Fascinating that Watson was another victim of The Bell Curve and became entrenched by his undeserved arrogance and hubris
A Sharon Begley byline, almost 5 years after her death.

Upon hearing the news James Watson had died, a STAT reporter said in our Slack, "I wish I could read what Sharon would have written."

Incredible news: Sharon in fact did pre-write a Watson obit. And it is masterful and excoriating.
🧪🧬🧫
James Watson, dead at 97, was a scientific legend and a pariah among his peers
James Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA who died Thursday at 97, was a scientific legend and a pariah among his peers.
www.statnews.com
November 8, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Okay, here are some first reflections on Watson.
Watson's life is a tragedy, really of Shakespearean proportions. He did not, as most bios will tell you, do one great thing when he was young and then collect laurels for it for the next 60 years. His career arc was unlike any in science.
November 8, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Rarely in the entire history of science, has QC been a topic of such passion, importance and impact. If only the French and Americans had adopted such rigor when they messed up the design of that multi billion $ telescope because one was using the metric system, the other the imperial system.
New paper on everyone’s favourite topic, QC!
We show why you should do genotype-level QC on your WGS data

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Very real quotes about this paper -
“The most exciting, mind-blowing paper of the year!”
“On a par with Fisher 1918”
“I read it every night. Just so beautiful”
Genotype-level quality control substantially reduces error rates in population-scale whole-genome sequencing
Population-scale whole-genome sequencing data will contain many individual-level genotype errors, even after allele-level quality control (QC). We establish the need for genotype-level QC using UK Bio...
www.biorxiv.org
November 8, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
New paper on everyone’s favourite topic, QC!
We show why you should do genotype-level QC on your WGS data

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Very real quotes about this paper -
“The most exciting, mind-blowing paper of the year!”
“On a par with Fisher 1918”
“I read it every night. Just so beautiful”
Genotype-level quality control substantially reduces error rates in population-scale whole-genome sequencing
Population-scale whole-genome sequencing data will contain many individual-level genotype errors, even after allele-level quality control (QC). We establish the need for genotype-level QC using UK Bio...
www.biorxiv.org
November 8, 2025 at 9:31 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Bluetorial-Jim Watson

I met Jim Watson a few times but did not know him well. However, I was greatly influenced by his book “The Double Helix”. He was a complicated human being with some very, very bad features, but some good contributions.

What follows is my personal perspective.

1/41
a cartoon says hey everybody an old man 's talking while bart simpson looks on
ALT: a cartoon says hey everybody an old man 's talking while bart simpson looks on
media.tenor.com
November 8, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Probably the papers I share the most often are @f2harrell.bsky.social 1996 on how to effectively develop multivariate models and @benvancalster.bsky.social 2019 paper on Calibration. Both extremely well written and informative. What are you most shared stats paper? #statistics #statssky #academicsky
November 7, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
✨Hello folks!✨

We're back in your feed with an amazing paper spotlight by @kirahoeffler.bsky.social & colleagues📰🔦

"Optimizing genetic ancestry adjustment in DNA methylation studies: a comparative analysis of approaches"

🔗http://bit.ly/49syndi

Read our overview below!

🧵1/6
November 1, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
📈 #TrendingWithImpact:
A new #research paper was #published on September 10, titled “Longitudinal associations of epigenetic aging with cognitive aging in Hispanic/Latino adults from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.”

🔗 doi.org/10.18632/agi...

#aging #quote #epigenetics
November 4, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
If people are using the correct statistics, casual inference and study design, they will quickly realize they don't have the funds to design the study, the time to learn the statistics, or the right data to answer the actual question they are interested in. Then they will never publish or get tenure
November 7, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
Reposted by Daniel E. Weeks
My prediction is that LLM peer review will slow down science. It will do this for precisely the same reasons that contemporary peer review does and some extra ones. Start by reading @hansonmark.bsky.social thread below, then read on. 🧵
Just tried q.e.d. by @odedrechavi.bsky.social et al. with a few papers including by myself & others where I knew a claim within was flawed based on a misunderstanding of the signal.

1) it was impressive. I see what the hype is about.
2) it hallucinated.

www.qedscience.com

Overly long #SciPub🧵 1/n
q.e.d Science
Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
www.qedscience.com
November 6, 2025 at 9:30 PM