Science Fanista
@samclean.bsky.social
Science, reading, writing, cooking,
Reposted by Science Fanista
“Joe Biden did nothing to fix the system that they knew was broken.”
He did nothing — except pass a $105 billion program to fix the system.
Reporters, Sean Duffy thinks you’re incapable of a simple Google search.
He did nothing — except pass a $105 billion program to fix the system.
Reporters, Sean Duffy thinks you’re incapable of a simple Google search.
Sean Duffy: "We're all been reporting and seeing what's happening at Newark airport. And I think it's clear that the blame belongs with the last administration."
May 12, 2025 at 7:15 PM
“Joe Biden did nothing to fix the system that they knew was broken.”
He did nothing — except pass a $105 billion program to fix the system.
Reporters, Sean Duffy thinks you’re incapable of a simple Google search.
He did nothing — except pass a $105 billion program to fix the system.
Reporters, Sean Duffy thinks you’re incapable of a simple Google search.
Reposted by Science Fanista
This is insane. Republicans have inserted language into the budget reconciliation bill that would ban states from regulating AI in any capacity for 10 years.
from @404media.co
www.404media.co/republicans-...
from @404media.co
www.404media.co/republicans-...
May 12, 2025 at 8:47 PM
This is insane. Republicans have inserted language into the budget reconciliation bill that would ban states from regulating AI in any capacity for 10 years.
from @404media.co
www.404media.co/republicans-...
from @404media.co
www.404media.co/republicans-...
Reposted by Science Fanista
Aaaand there it is.
May 12, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Aaaand there it is.
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
Phrases NOT found in that NYT piece:
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
May 12, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Phrases NOT found in that NYT piece:
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
Reposted by Science Fanista
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
“no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
“no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
May 11, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
“no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
“no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
Reposted by Science Fanista
It's not only breathtakingly corrupt, it's manifestly illegal, no matter what permission is received from a cowardly and compromised Department of Justice.
May 11, 2025 at 3:38 PM
It's not only breathtakingly corrupt, it's manifestly illegal, no matter what permission is received from a cowardly and compromised Department of Justice.
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
We can learn an important lesson from the era of Joseph McCarthy.
The danger of fear, the power of courage. And how to defeat a demagogue.
youtu.be/OEaj2xlKaeU?...
The danger of fear, the power of courage. And how to defeat a demagogue.
youtu.be/OEaj2xlKaeU?...
An Lesson from History
YouTube video by Sen. Adam Schiff
youtu.be
May 10, 2025 at 12:00 AM
We can learn an important lesson from the era of Joseph McCarthy.
The danger of fear, the power of courage. And how to defeat a demagogue.
youtu.be/OEaj2xlKaeU?...
The danger of fear, the power of courage. And how to defeat a demagogue.
youtu.be/OEaj2xlKaeU?...
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
I want a law passed in Congress that FORBIDS ANY law enforcement, ICE, DHS, or CBP from hiding their faces.
May 9, 2025 at 6:02 AM
I want a law passed in Congress that FORBIDS ANY law enforcement, ICE, DHS, or CBP from hiding their faces.
Reposted by Science Fanista
He keeps picking television personalities to run things because they’re all he knows. He doesn’t read. Not books, not articles, not academic journals, not even his briefings. All he does is play golf and watch TV.
May 8, 2025 at 11:28 PM
He keeps picking television personalities to run things because they’re all he knows. He doesn’t read. Not books, not articles, not academic journals, not even his briefings. All he does is play golf and watch TV.
Reposted by Science Fanista
Birdbrain of Alcatraz
May 7, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Birdbrain of Alcatraz
Reposted by Science Fanista
A US judge to govt lawyers defending the NIH's grant terminations:
"I understand the administration is against DEI. Respectfully, I just don't know what you mean. This isn't a teasing question. There has to be some working definition.
This is research to advance healthcare for all our citizens."
"I understand the administration is against DEI. Respectfully, I just don't know what you mean. This isn't a teasing question. There has to be some working definition.
This is research to advance healthcare for all our citizens."
May 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM
A US judge to govt lawyers defending the NIH's grant terminations:
"I understand the administration is against DEI. Respectfully, I just don't know what you mean. This isn't a teasing question. There has to be some working definition.
This is research to advance healthcare for all our citizens."
"I understand the administration is against DEI. Respectfully, I just don't know what you mean. This isn't a teasing question. There has to be some working definition.
This is research to advance healthcare for all our citizens."
Reposted by Science Fanista
Reposted by Science Fanista
Two of Musk’s most strident goons manually, one-by-one, killed lifesaving programs even those Rubio wants credit for trying to save, on Musk’s orders.
May 8, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Two of Musk’s most strident goons manually, one-by-one, killed lifesaving programs even those Rubio wants credit for trying to save, on Musk’s orders.
Reposted by Science Fanista
I don’t mean to alarm anyone, but the orcas now have two F/A-18 Hornets
May 7, 2025 at 1:20 PM
I don’t mean to alarm anyone, but the orcas now have two F/A-18 Hornets
Reposted by Science Fanista
Impossible to communicate to people that once you decide that a group more vulnerable than you can be sacrificed in the name of your own safety or interests that you have already entered into an tacit agreement that you can also be sacrificed in the interests of a group less vulnerable than you.
May 8, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Impossible to communicate to people that once you decide that a group more vulnerable than you can be sacrificed in the name of your own safety or interests that you have already entered into an tacit agreement that you can also be sacrificed in the interests of a group less vulnerable than you.
Reposted by Science Fanista
When asked if the United States should have a military parade to show off its might, President Eisenhower responded:
“Absolutely not. We are the pre-eminent power on Earth. For us to try and imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.”
“Absolutely not. We are the pre-eminent power on Earth. For us to try and imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.”
May 7, 2025 at 1:05 AM
When asked if the United States should have a military parade to show off its might, President Eisenhower responded:
“Absolutely not. We are the pre-eminent power on Earth. For us to try and imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.”
“Absolutely not. We are the pre-eminent power on Earth. For us to try and imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.”
Reposted by Science Fanista
Can't get enough of this. The "Secretary of Education"? Go back home and fake wrestle.
Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, sent Harvard a letter.
They graded it.
Bwahahaha.
They graded it.
Bwahahaha.
May 7, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Can't get enough of this. The "Secretary of Education"? Go back home and fake wrestle.
Reposted by Science Fanista
Shouldn’t this be a bigger story?!? Senator Mark Warner calls for probe into report that WH is pressuring countries to use Musk’s Starlink company in exchange for tariff relief. Watch: open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
May 5, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Shouldn’t this be a bigger story?!? Senator Mark Warner calls for probe into report that WH is pressuring countries to use Musk’s Starlink company in exchange for tariff relief. Watch: open.substack.com/pub/jimacost...
Reposted by Science Fanista
It’s official: Republicans want to kick millions of Americans off their health insurance to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
The nonpartisan scorekeepers at CBO just confirmed that the GOP’s plans would boot millions of people from Medicaid.
The nonpartisan scorekeepers at CBO just confirmed that the GOP’s plans would boot millions of people from Medicaid.
GOP Plans To Cut Medicaid Would Kick Millions Off Health Insurance, New Analysis Says
An authoritative analysis by Congressional Budget Office is House Speaker Mike Johnson's latest headache.
www.huffpost.com
May 7, 2025 at 7:25 PM
It’s official: Republicans want to kick millions of Americans off their health insurance to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
The nonpartisan scorekeepers at CBO just confirmed that the GOP’s plans would boot millions of people from Medicaid.
The nonpartisan scorekeepers at CBO just confirmed that the GOP’s plans would boot millions of people from Medicaid.