Science Fanista
@samclean.bsky.social
Science, reading, writing, cooking,
Reposted by Science Fanista
Phrases NOT found in that NYT piece:
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
May 12, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Phrases NOT found in that NYT piece:
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.
— “emoluments clause”
— “unconstitutional”
— “impeachable offense”
But rest assured that they *did* find time to bothsides this issue by mentioning Hunter Biden’s sleazy but legal trading on his family name.
Yeah, those are equivalent. Good work, boys.