Pawel Swidlicki
banner
pswidlicki.bsky.social
Pawel Swidlicki
@pswidlicki.bsky.social
Currently clean on OPSEC
Just struck me, apropos of nothing in particular, that if we get indy majority in next year's Scottish elections and in next GE we get Reform majority in England (especially on relatively low vote share) and SNP majority in Scotland, odds of some kind of wildcat indyref would be relatively high
November 11, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Really hard to try to work out the principal motivation of somebody who comes to mark Polish national independence day with a Confederate flag
November 11, 2025 at 3:33 PM
The key point which is oddly absent from much of the wider debate on this
2/n If the words / clips broadcast were not an accurate reflection of Trump's speech, they were, nonetheless, and accurate representation of his incitement and enabling of the invasion of the Capitol. And that's the key fact.

How can it be defamatory when Trump's actions match the words broadcast?
November 11, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Internal dysfunctionality isn't necessarily an absolute bar to achieving short-term political success so I wouldn't completely write-off Your Party but in addition to being objectively hilarious, it does feel like it is hobbling its potential at critical juncture www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Your Party row erupts over hundreds of thousands of pounds in donations
Clash the latest in months of political infighting between the camps of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana
www.theguardian.com
November 11, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Absolutely useless and pathetic, the local elections can't come round soon enough 🗑️
Minister suggests BBC should apologise to Trump over documentary as president threatens $1bn lawsuit – UK politics live
Minister suggests BBC should apologise to Trump over documentary as president threatens $1bn lawsuit – UK politics live
Alison McGovern speaks to media about BBC crisis as culture secretary due to address MPs in attempt to contain fallout On the Today programme, Christopher Ruddy, CEO of Newsmax, a rightwing news organisation in the US, and someone who has been a friend of Donald Trump for years, was interviewed about Trump’s threat to sue the BBC. Here are the main points he made. Ruddy said that, if the BBC were to fight the case in the Florida courts, they would probably win. He explained: The fact is, I’m from the state of Florida. I’m very familiar with the Florida libel laws. I have no doubt the BBC misrepresented what the president said. And that’s pretty clear. I think everybody agrees, otherwise you wouldn’t have had those resignations. But Ruddy also acknowledged that other media organisations sued by Trump had decided to settle rather contest his claims. “What’s happening is that a lot of media companies would prefer not to go through the media spectacle of all this,” he said. Ruddy said that, when Trump forced other media organisations to settle, he viewed that as proving his case that they were peddling “fake news”. Referring to the CBS and ABC lawsuits (see 9.22am), Ruddy said: I think he sees these as victories … He sees this as legitimising his claims that there’s fake news, that the news is out to get him. Ruddy said Trump regarded the BBC resignations announced on Sunday as a victory. I congratulate that the BBC and people resigned, and they were held accountable. In American media organisation oftentimes you don’t see that and there’s not a sense of accountability. The president sees this as a big victory for him in his claim the media is out to get him. Ruddy said he thought there was a good chance that Trump would go ahead with his threat to sue the BBC. He may very well sue the BBC because he’s had a winning record on bringing these suits. Ruddy said that the fact that the BBC is funded by the taxpayer would not deter Trump. I think that he he feels that there are very big wealth funded organisation and if they did him wrong then and he could be compensated for that. And I think he sees that as a win for him and a win for truth. Ruddy said he did not think Trump would worry about legal action damaging his relationship with the UK government. I do think that it [legal action] doesn’t hurt his relationship [with the UK government]. He has a very good relationship with Keir Starmer. He’s certainly widely respects King Charles. He does not see this as impinging at all on the very good relationship that he has with Britain. I was with him at Windsor Castle, when he was there [for the state visit]. I think he and Melania felt that was one of the high points of his presidency so far. The BBC is going to be thriving and I support everyone on the team. Continue reading...
www.theguardian.com
November 11, 2025 at 10:54 AM
It can mean pretty much anything, but regardless, it is almost always deeply cringe
Could someone explain to me what is meant when a British person refers to "the middle class" ? Like, in the US, as I hear it, it basically just means a person who makes a certain amount of money, not too far below and not wildly above the median. Seems like a complex concept when UK writers use it?
November 10, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Feel like the line should be 'Are we seriously claiming that Trump did not incite violence on January 6th in an attempt to overturn a democratic election'? The Russia stuff, while somewhat valid, just feels a bit stale.
Journalist, "Farage accused the BBC of election interference"

Ed Davey, "The interference we've seen is from Farage's friend, Putin"

"We've seen Russian interference in the most appalling way"
November 10, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Other than things involving actual death and suffering, this is probably the worst and most disturbing thing I've read in a long time
Plastic surgeons in DC are being asked by Trump insiders to get plastic surgery that's obvious and in keeping with "Mar-a-Lago face."

Paging @inbedwiththeright.bsky.social, whose episode on Republican Makeup (another term for the same tendency) was an eye-opener for me.
D.C. plastic surgeons see surge in "Mar‑a‑Lago face" requests from Trump insiders
"[They] want to look like they had something done."
www.axios.com
November 10, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Joyce Carol Oates' assessment of Musk also reminds me of this brutal Stephen Collins cartoon
November 10, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Fraser 'Brexit means UK no longer has a populism problem' Nelson
The Anglo consensus of the first half of 2010s was that where continental Europeans were endemically subject to crises and demagoguery, "we" were distinctly were more enlightened. Cameron's Britain. Obama's America. Ponderous essays about Magna Carta and the "golden thread".

How wrong it all was.
I fear we are seeing in the UK what has become abundantly clear in the US: for all their power and privilege, elites and institutions are absolute cowards in the face of right-wing authoritarianism. Weak, weak, weak, as Tony Blair once said
November 10, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
Sack the editor of the New York Times every time it writes about boiled mutton.
Maybe Keir should demand the heads of major US news networks any time they imply Britain is on the brink of civil war or that we live under sharia law. Or does it not work both ways?
November 10, 2025 at 11:39 AM
"The problem isn’t that we have a deliberately biased BBC, it’s that we have a BBC that has been consciously reduced in its scope and bullied into dumbing down and retreating."
www.ft.com/content/676c...
Home - Financial Times
News, analysis and opinion from the Financial Times on the latest in markets, economics and politics
FT.com
November 10, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
It's not even strictly partisan, Democrats who suck up to him can get in on it too (Blagojevich did, good chance Menendez will). No need for any pretense a prosecution was flawed in some way. It's official policy that Trump just straight-up hates the idea corruption should be illegal and punished.
November 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
If someone on the left says "Israel is an apartheid state" the press will say that they are expressing views that are seen by many as antisemitic. But literal Holocaust denying, explicitly pro-Hitler Nick Fuentes is simply a cause of "heartburn."
I'm still trying to parse this formulation because "heartburn" seems like a mild thing to cause for a major political party when a significant part of its base is allied with a despicable racist and antisemite, but also because by dining with him isn't Trump the one causing the heartburn?
November 6, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
"Insensitive remarks"
November 6, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
Cool. What would you call the other wing then? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/u...
November 6, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Mamdani does seem to cause many of his political opponents' brains to to self-combust simply by existing, which is a useful asset bsky.app/profile/jben...
When Zohran won the election it was the same as 9/11
November 5, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
Looks like extraordinary cowardice. "...following pressure from the Chinese state and a separate defamation law suit against the university, Sheffield Hallam decided not to publish a final piece of research by Prof Murphy and her team into forced labour." www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
November 3, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
Remember when Farage talks *about* work he is largely talking *to* people who have retired from it
'Alarm clock Britain' is remarkably hackneyed, cliched and - frankly - dull - phraseology from someone who is meant to be good at this stuff.
November 3, 2025 at 8:56 AM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
European negotiators were personally targeted by their American counterparts during a brutal negotiation over green shipping rules, European Commission officials told POLITICO. 

This highly unusual gambit left diplomats shaken after the meeting. 
US accused of threatening EU diplomats during bid to kill green shipping rules
Negotiators at shipping talks in London were told both they and their countries could be punished unless they voted with the U.S.
www.politico.eu
November 3, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Does this make the released guy British again?
The fact that one of the two men arrested has now been cleared and released is a pretty huge "STOP" sign to everyone who's spent the last 24 hours rushing to interpret the attack. Facts, like trains, are sometimes slower to arrive than we'd like. But you just have to wait for them.
Extract from more recent Goodwin post. He really should never be allowed on the BBC - or any other reputable broadcaster - again.
November 2, 2025 at 11:10 PM
I get the underlying point here, but interesting to apply it, for example to the Cambridge Five. They are considered traitors, but haven't seen anyone argue they weren't really British because they chose loyalty to a foreign nation/ideology over the country of their birth.
November 2, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
The problem with diagnosing "the electorate have unreasonable expectations around tax and spend" is that those expectations did not develop in a vacuum. They are the product of decades of politicians and the media telling them they can have x services with y tax levels, or not contradicting it.
A Brexiter writes...
November 1, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
Thanks to @nacho-fariza.bsky.social @elpais.com for this interview on the Dutch election result. In short, the three defining features of European politics in 2020s - anti-incumbency, fragmentation, volatility - can work for *and against* the radical right.

elpais.com/internaciona...
La extrema derecha mantiene uno de cada tres gobiernos europeos pese al varapalo de Wilders en los Países Bajos
Los ultras gobiernan de manera estable en Italia, y lideran los sondeos en Alemania, Francia y el Reino Unido
elpais.com
November 2, 2025 at 7:50 AM
Reposted by Pawel Swidlicki
media elites have talked themselves into a weird bind, where liberalism is so much the default that simultaneously a) it doesn't need defending but also b) any defeat no matter how marginal must refute it completely
Douthat writes that 2024, when Harris lost by 1.5% of the popular vote, was "an ideological referendum and progressivism lost." I wonder why he didn't view the 2020 election, when Trump lost by 4.5% of the popular vote, as a far more significant loss for conservatism.
bsky.app/profile/larr...
Comparing the relation between the presidential election results in 2020 and 2024 with the post-election commentary is a fascinating exercise.

2020
Biden 81,283,501 popular votes, 51.3%
Trump 74,223,975 popular votes 46.8%

2024
Trump 77,302,580 49.8%
Harris 75,017,613. 48.3%
November 1, 2025 at 11:09 PM