Reposted by Hannah
42% for abolish ICE without an iota of mainstream elected Democratic buy in, this could be over 60% if they tried even a little.
YouGov poll - In the future, would you support or oppose...
Eliminating ICE as a federal agency?
Support 42%
Oppose 45%
Reducing ICE’s size and funding
Support 48%
Oppose 37%
d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/IC...
Eliminating ICE as a federal agency?
Support 42%
Oppose 45%
Reducing ICE’s size and funding
Support 48%
Oppose 37%
d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/IC...
January 12, 2026 at 11:38 PM
42% for abolish ICE without an iota of mainstream elected Democratic buy in, this could be over 60% if they tried even a little.
Reposted by Hannah
Reposted by Hannah
welcome to the margin of error, “abolish ice”
YouGov poll - In the future, would you support or oppose...
Eliminating ICE as a federal agency?
Support 42%
Oppose 45%
Reducing ICE’s size and funding
Support 48%
Oppose 37%
d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/IC...
Eliminating ICE as a federal agency?
Support 42%
Oppose 45%
Reducing ICE’s size and funding
Support 48%
Oppose 37%
d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/IC...
January 13, 2026 at 12:05 AM
welcome to the margin of error, “abolish ice”
Reposted by Hannah
Would be great to see every Golden Globe winner end their speech with “abolish ice” tonight
January 11, 2026 at 7:30 PM
Would be great to see every Golden Globe winner end their speech with “abolish ice” tonight
Reposted by Hannah
Abolish ICE' chant in Portland!
January 10, 2026 at 8:17 PM
Abolish ICE' chant in Portland!
Reposted by Hannah
We don't need to give ICE agents more training. We need to subject them to rigorous oversight and, when they commit crimes, we need to prosecute them.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
Chris Murphy: "The amount of training that's given to an ICE officer has been cut in half by this administration. The number of days of training they get are 47. You know why they get 47 days? As an homage to the vanity of POTUS. No wonder the number of violent incidents are going through the roof."
January 11, 2026 at 5:44 PM
We don't need to give ICE agents more training. We need to subject them to rigorous oversight and, when they commit crimes, we need to prosecute them.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
Reposted by Hannah
We need to abolish ICE.
We don't need to give ICE agents more training. We need to subject them to rigorous oversight and, when they commit crimes, we need to prosecute them.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
The only education they need is to learn that they can and will be held accountable for what they do in the field.
Chris Murphy: "The amount of training that's given to an ICE officer has been cut in half by this administration. The number of days of training they get are 47. You know why they get 47 days? As an homage to the vanity of POTUS. No wonder the number of violent incidents are going through the roof."
January 11, 2026 at 5:47 PM
We need to abolish ICE.
Reposted by Hannah
100%. If you want an alternative slogan you can go with "Abolish ICE before they kill again."
the only reason "abolish ICE" is seen as radical is that no one will say it but the far left. if every normie Democrat started saying it tomorrow it would move the overton window so far you'd have to squint to find it. my kingdom for leaders who understand they can shape public opinion.
Democrats officially going all in on the mealy mouthed “ICE needs training” narrative.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
January 12, 2026 at 7:42 PM
100%. If you want an alternative slogan you can go with "Abolish ICE before they kill again."
Reposted by Hannah
they abolished the department of education, we do not need a trojan horse to abolish ice we can just do it
January 12, 2026 at 8:42 PM
they abolished the department of education, we do not need a trojan horse to abolish ice we can just do it
Reposted by Hannah
broke: abolish ice
woke: abolish DHS
bespoke: abolish borders
woke: abolish DHS
bespoke: abolish borders
January 12, 2026 at 11:34 PM
broke: abolish ice
woke: abolish DHS
bespoke: abolish borders
woke: abolish DHS
bespoke: abolish borders
Reposted by Hannah
See you out there today. Abolish ICE!! ✊
January 10, 2026 at 1:49 PM
See you out there today. Abolish ICE!! ✊
Reposted by Hannah
Democrats officially going all in on the mealy mouthed “ICE needs training” narrative.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
WARNER: It used to take 5 to 6 months to get trained. They've now lowered the training period to 47 days. Why 47 days? Because Donald Trump's the 47th president. Tell me that's a rational approach
KERNEN: I'm not taking that bait
WARNER: Joe! You can't pick your facts
KERNEN: I'm not taking that bait
WARNER: Joe! You can't pick your facts
January 12, 2026 at 1:45 PM
Democrats officially going all in on the mealy mouthed “ICE needs training” narrative.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
No. ABOLISH ICE.
Reposted by Hannah
Abolish the crazy thugs at ICE.
January 10, 2026 at 1:58 AM
Abolish the crazy thugs at ICE.
Reposted by Hannah
Abolish ICE
January 12, 2026 at 6:18 PM
Abolish ICE
Reposted by Hannah
Go Bears.
Fuck the Packers.
Abolish ICE.
Fuck the Packers.
Abolish ICE.
January 10, 2026 at 11:11 PM
Go Bears.
Fuck the Packers.
Abolish ICE.
Fuck the Packers.
Abolish ICE.
Reposted by Hannah
Sometimes during a movie or TV show when people are having a discussion, often someone responds immediately after the other person stops talking, when it reality they would need at least a second to think.
It comes off as unnatural and unrealistic.
It comes off as unnatural and unrealistic.
January 12, 2026 at 5:43 AM
Sometimes during a movie or TV show when people are having a discussion, often someone responds immediately after the other person stops talking, when it reality they would need at least a second to think.
It comes off as unnatural and unrealistic.
It comes off as unnatural and unrealistic.
Reposted by Hannah
AOC: I want everybody to understand that the cuts to your health care are what’s paying for this. You get screwed over to pay a bunch of thugs in the street that are shooting mothers in the face.
January 13, 2026 at 1:20 AM
AOC: I want everybody to understand that the cuts to your health care are what’s paying for this. You get screwed over to pay a bunch of thugs in the street that are shooting mothers in the face.
Reposted by Hannah
This is starting to feel like elder abuse.
January 13, 2026 at 3:49 AM
This is starting to feel like elder abuse.
Reposted by Hannah
goodmorning oomfies soon it's gonna start my way back home (2nd one), again 12hr travelling and the next 5 are gonna be on the train and ofc i got a loud family next to ME with a very talkative child AT FU**ING 6AM 😙✌🏻
January 12, 2026 at 5:01 AM
goodmorning oomfies soon it's gonna start my way back home (2nd one), again 12hr travelling and the next 5 are gonna be on the train and ofc i got a loud family next to ME with a very talkative child AT FU**ING 6AM 😙✌🏻
Reposted by Hannah
Damn, you'd think with Aaron Rodgers being anti-vaxx, it'd be easier to catch something from him.
January 13, 2026 at 4:17 AM
Damn, you'd think with Aaron Rodgers being anti-vaxx, it'd be easier to catch something from him.
Reposted by Hannah
Nobody works this hard for this long to cover up something this bad unless they are guilty.
December 20, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Nobody works this hard for this long to cover up something this bad unless they are guilty.
Reposted by Hannah
Many gun owners are against stricter gun background checks. I can understand why, because stricter background checks would reveal that many of them are completely mentally unfit to own firearms. Who do you think does all those mass shootings? Civilian gun owners who are not playing with a full deck.
December 20, 2025 at 4:02 AM
Many gun owners are against stricter gun background checks. I can understand why, because stricter background checks would reveal that many of them are completely mentally unfit to own firearms. Who do you think does all those mass shootings? Civilian gun owners who are not playing with a full deck.
Reposted by Hannah
not that the present economic picture is rosy, but i do think that popular culture — and specifically nostalgia bait television — is a big part of the reason that our public memory of the 1970s, 1980s and even 1990s seems to miss the real economic pain that marked each of those decades.
December 20, 2025 at 2:44 PM
not that the present economic picture is rosy, but i do think that popular culture — and specifically nostalgia bait television — is a big part of the reason that our public memory of the 1970s, 1980s and even 1990s seems to miss the real economic pain that marked each of those decades.
Reposted by Hannah
Good to know. Everyone's been wanting to know.
December 19, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Good to know. Everyone's been wanting to know.