@bodhicitta3021.bsky.social
Reposted
Walz on Trump calling him the r-word: "We all know both as an educator & parent that using that term is just so damaging. It's hurtful. We have fought 3 decades to get this out of our schools. Kids know better. But this is what Donald Trump has done. He's normalized this type of hateful behavior."
November 30, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Walz on Trump calling him the r-word: "We all know both as an educator & parent that using that term is just so damaging. It's hurtful. We have fought 3 decades to get this out of our schools. Kids know better. But this is what Donald Trump has done. He's normalized this type of hateful behavior."
Reposted
November 30, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Reposted
Van Hollen: "It's either murder from the first strike if their whole theory is wrong, and I think the weight of the legal opinion is they've concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept it, then it is a war crime. I do believe the secretary of defense should be held accountable"
November 30, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Van Hollen: "It's either murder from the first strike if their whole theory is wrong, and I think the weight of the legal opinion is they've concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept it, then it is a war crime. I do believe the secretary of defense should be held accountable"
December 1, 2025 at 5:00 AM
Reposted
Reposted
First journalist to find out if it’s cancer or a stroke will win a Pulitzer.
December 1, 2025 at 2:41 AM
First journalist to find out if it’s cancer or a stroke will win a Pulitzer.
Reposted
"… in the present instance, it was perfectly clear to the accused that killing defenceless people in the life-boats could be nothing else but a breach of the law. As naval officers by profession they were well aware …."
December 1, 2025 at 12:38 AM
"… in the present instance, it was perfectly clear to the accused that killing defenceless people in the life-boats could be nothing else but a breach of the law. As naval officers by profession they were well aware …."
Reposted
"True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.”
—FDR, 1944
—FDR, 1944
November 30, 2025 at 8:08 PM
"True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.”
—FDR, 1944
—FDR, 1944
Reposted
Starting //// going
December 1, 2025 at 4:47 AM
Reposted
Are those "MANY GREAT LEGAL SCHOLARS" in the room with you right now, Piggy?
November 23, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Are those "MANY GREAT LEGAL SCHOLARS" in the room with you right now, Piggy?
Wrong!
Do you know how MANY
ATROCITIES have been committed by servicemen
"Just following orders"
It is IMPERATIVE that
WE only OBEY orders That are "LAWFUL"
Or
Do NOT conflict w/the
Constitution
Do you know how MANY
ATROCITIES have been committed by servicemen
"Just following orders"
It is IMPERATIVE that
WE only OBEY orders That are "LAWFUL"
Or
Do NOT conflict w/the
Constitution
Okay, but she's RIGHT. Junior enlisted are in no way qualified to make that determination and doing so is a guarantee of repercussions.
November 24, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Wrong!
Do you know how MANY
ATROCITIES have been committed by servicemen
"Just following orders"
It is IMPERATIVE that
WE only OBEY orders That are "LAWFUL"
Or
Do NOT conflict w/the
Constitution
Do you know how MANY
ATROCITIES have been committed by servicemen
"Just following orders"
It is IMPERATIVE that
WE only OBEY orders That are "LAWFUL"
Or
Do NOT conflict w/the
Constitution
Reposted
But if the orders of the president are unconstitutional they shouldn't obey because that's the first part of their oath. The president cannot override the constitution.
November 24, 2025 at 3:57 PM
But if the orders of the president are unconstitutional they shouldn't obey because that's the first part of their oath. The president cannot override the constitution.
ALSO left out that pesky
"Uphold & DEFEND the
CONSTITUTION From
ALL AGGRESSORS
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
And #34xConvictedFelon #PedoTrump
Absolutely QUALIFIES as
A
"DOMESTIC AGGRESSOR"
"Uphold & DEFEND the
CONSTITUTION From
ALL AGGRESSORS
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
And #34xConvictedFelon #PedoTrump
Absolutely QUALIFIES as
A
"DOMESTIC AGGRESSOR"
She's pointing out that enlisted personnel take an oath which specifically states "obey the orders of the President" (while ignoring "according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice")
November 24, 2025 at 5:45 PM
ALSO left out that pesky
"Uphold & DEFEND the
CONSTITUTION From
ALL AGGRESSORS
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
And #34xConvictedFelon #PedoTrump
Absolutely QUALIFIES as
A
"DOMESTIC AGGRESSOR"
"Uphold & DEFEND the
CONSTITUTION From
ALL AGGRESSORS
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
And #34xConvictedFelon #PedoTrump
Absolutely QUALIFIES as
A
"DOMESTIC AGGRESSOR"
Reposted
Reposting this clip of Harry Enten talking about inflation to make clear that the numbers he cites comes from a poll about how Americans *feel* prices are going up, not percentages of prices increases themselves. It's still not good news for Trump politically.
November 24, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Reposting this clip of Harry Enten talking about inflation to make clear that the numbers he cites comes from a poll about how Americans *feel* prices are going up, not percentages of prices increases themselves. It's still not good news for Trump politically.
No it's NOT!
We took an Oath to obey
The "LAWFUL ORDERS" of our Superiors
We took an Oath to obey
The "LAWFUL ORDERS" of our Superiors
Fitting that this Administration would want a return to "just following orders."
BLITZER: I want to be precise. Should members of the US military obey clearly illegal orders?
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
November 24, 2025 at 5:39 PM
No it's NOT!
We took an Oath to obey
The "LAWFUL ORDERS" of our Superiors
We took an Oath to obey
The "LAWFUL ORDERS" of our Superiors
Those of us familiar with Justice Robert Jackson's concurrence in Youngstown Steel certainly recall the "Because He Has Proven He Can Protect America" test on the limits of executive power when acting beyond congressional authorization.
Lutnick on the tariffs case before SCOTUS: "You're gonna watch the Supreme Court back this president because this president has proven that he can protect America. We're gonna win this case. You heard it from me."
November 24, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Reposted
Rand Paul on Trump admin: "They're pretending as if we're at war ... they want to have it both ways. They want to say, 'We can just say these people are terrorists so we can blow them up,' but it's extraordinary that when some of them survive, they pluck them out of the water & don't prosecute them"
November 24, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Rand Paul on Trump admin: "They're pretending as if we're at war ... they want to have it both ways. They want to say, 'We can just say these people are terrorists so we can blow them up,' but it's extraordinary that when some of them survive, they pluck them out of the water & don't prosecute them"
Reposted
"Mamdani said Trump was a fascist & Trump practically got on his knees to kiss his shoes. Mark Kelly & company asked troops to not obey illegal orders & Trump called for their deaths. Both cases demonstrate that standing up to Trump without compromising works a lot better than bending the knee."
Dems win key messaging battles against Trump
Dems across the ideological spectrum are taking him on and emerging stronger.
www.publicnotice.co
November 24, 2025 at 4:35 PM
"Mamdani said Trump was a fascist & Trump practically got on his knees to kiss his shoes. Mark Kelly & company asked troops to not obey illegal orders & Trump called for their deaths. Both cases demonstrate that standing up to Trump without compromising works a lot better than bending the knee."
Reposted
CNN's Pamela Brown to Jamie Raskin: "Are Democrats losing the moral high ground on the Epstein issue by defending Stacey Plaskett?"
November 24, 2025 at 4:40 PM
CNN's Pamela Brown to Jamie Raskin: "Are Democrats losing the moral high ground on the Epstein issue by defending Stacey Plaskett?"
Reposted
PAMELA BROWN: Texting with the president is different than texting with a pedophile, right?
RASKIN: Are you saying would I want to censure someone just because they had a phone call with a convicted felon and an adjudicated sex assailant? Because that's what Donald Trump is
RASKIN: Are you saying would I want to censure someone just because they had a phone call with a convicted felon and an adjudicated sex assailant? Because that's what Donald Trump is
November 24, 2025 at 4:46 PM
PAMELA BROWN: Texting with the president is different than texting with a pedophile, right?
RASKIN: Are you saying would I want to censure someone just because they had a phone call with a convicted felon and an adjudicated sex assailant? Because that's what Donald Trump is
RASKIN: Are you saying would I want to censure someone just because they had a phone call with a convicted felon and an adjudicated sex assailant? Because that's what Donald Trump is
Reposted
PAMELA BROWN: Are Democrats having discussions about how to handle it if more members are embroiled in anything having to do with Epstein?
RASKIN: I literally have not had one Democrat in the House or Senate come to us and say, 'Hey, you better slow down, that might embarrass one of our people'
RASKIN: I literally have not had one Democrat in the House or Senate come to us and say, 'Hey, you better slow down, that might embarrass one of our people'
November 24, 2025 at 4:47 PM
PAMELA BROWN: Are Democrats having discussions about how to handle it if more members are embroiled in anything having to do with Epstein?
RASKIN: I literally have not had one Democrat in the House or Senate come to us and say, 'Hey, you better slow down, that might embarrass one of our people'
RASKIN: I literally have not had one Democrat in the House or Senate come to us and say, 'Hey, you better slow down, that might embarrass one of our people'
NO!
We have
TAKEN AN OATH
to NOT obey
"UNLAWFUL ORDERS"
& to "Uphold & Defend
The Constitution from
ALL Aggressors
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
We have
TAKEN AN OATH
to NOT obey
"UNLAWFUL ORDERS"
& to "Uphold & Defend
The Constitution from
ALL Aggressors
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
This is *expressly* not the law
BLITZER: I want to be precise. Should members of the US military obey clearly illegal orders?
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
November 24, 2025 at 5:31 PM
NO!
We have
TAKEN AN OATH
to NOT obey
"UNLAWFUL ORDERS"
& to "Uphold & Defend
The Constitution from
ALL Aggressors
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
We have
TAKEN AN OATH
to NOT obey
"UNLAWFUL ORDERS"
& to "Uphold & Defend
The Constitution from
ALL Aggressors
Foreign & DOMESTIC"
Reposted
It's easy to believe most applicants to ICE can't even pass an open book test when you see the successful ones like this chad threatening to arrest a photographer simply for walking behind him in a goddamn Sam's Club parking lot.
Not exactly the sharpest bunch here.
Not exactly the sharpest bunch here.
🧵1/2 IG: mike_kelly_photography
“After an unsuccessful foot
chase outside a Sam's Club, this ICE agent became visibly angry with my presence documenting their activity, threatening to arrest me several times-as seen in this video” 🟥cont.🧵⤵️⤵️⤵️
▪️Chicago
video taken 9:25 a.m. 10/22/2025
“After an unsuccessful foot
chase outside a Sam's Club, this ICE agent became visibly angry with my presence documenting their activity, threatening to arrest me several times-as seen in this video” 🟥cont.🧵⤵️⤵️⤵️
▪️Chicago
video taken 9:25 a.m. 10/22/2025
October 27, 2025 at 5:38 PM
It's easy to believe most applicants to ICE can't even pass an open book test when you see the successful ones like this chad threatening to arrest a photographer simply for walking behind him in a goddamn Sam's Club parking lot.
Not exactly the sharpest bunch here.
Not exactly the sharpest bunch here.
Fukking A$$HOLES
Thugs.
Houston, Texas ICE GOONS hospitalized a 16-year-old U.S. citizen on his way to school. The teen, a star football and soccer player, was violently detained alongside his father. Despite his cries for help, “I’m underage!” the agents tackled him, resulting in severe neck and back injuries.
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Fukking A$$HOLES