90 senators (14 from each state, 3 from each territory)
~170 HoR seats
However I thought that was unlikely this term because Labor likely wouldn't want to dilute their favourable senate by growing the next class.
However...
90 senators (14 from each state, 3 from each territory)
~170 HoR seats
However I thought that was unlikely this term because Labor likely wouldn't want to dilute their favourable senate by growing the next class.
However...
If our lower house were elected with a more proportional system our politics would better reflect the views of the people rather than deliver power on the basis of strange mathematical quirks.
If our lower house were elected with a more proportional system our politics would better reflect the views of the people rather than deliver power on the basis of strange mathematical quirks.
Great article by Ben Raue. Look at this chart of how often states are an even split in the current allocation of 6 senators per half senate election.
Some day soon we should expand the parliament and ensure each state can give a decisive result.
Great article by Ben Raue. Look at this chart of how often states are an even split in the current allocation of 6 senators per half senate election.
Some day soon we should expand the parliament and ensure each state can give a decisive result.
Rather than spend advertising space claiming that you're saying something why not have the guts to, you know, actually say it?
Rather than spend advertising space claiming that you're saying something why not have the guts to, you know, actually say it?
Low engagement and ESL voters don't know what seat they're from. With so many independents and minor parties running the probability they find the right part of a HTV card amongst all the pieces of paper is quite low.
Low engagement and ESL voters don't know what seat they're from. With so many independents and minor parties running the probability they find the right part of a HTV card amongst all the pieces of paper is quite low.
The confusing "deals" that micro parties try to do just discredit themselves and rarely even help them gain seats or an outcome.
The confusing "deals" that micro parties try to do just discredit themselves and rarely even help them gain seats or an outcome.
I think it's a bad trend and bad data.
Comparing a sample of prepoll voters on the first two days of prepoll to the *total* prepoll behaviour in the previous election is not comparing the same cohort of voters.
I think it's a bad trend and bad data.
Comparing a sample of prepoll voters on the first two days of prepoll to the *total* prepoll behaviour in the previous election is not comparing the same cohort of voters.
Guess what some guys who think "Hitler did nothing wrong" are also on drugs, so might associate with the LCP.
Gullan still appears on the ballot as a Legalise Cannabis candidate, as pre-polling has already begun
Guess what some guys who think "Hitler did nothing wrong" are also on drugs, so might associate with the LCP.
And it would be symbioticly beneficial to both.
And it would be symbioticly beneficial to both.
Unfortunately unlike the YouGov MRP in these ones the 4th party data is all jumbled up. Presume *very* high variance. Also in general Redbridge has far stranger looking Green primary votes.
Unfortunately unlike the YouGov MRP in these ones the 4th party data is all jumbled up. Presume *very* high variance. Also in general Redbridge has far stranger looking Green primary votes.
I want to make some 3PP graphs out of it like I did with the YouGov MRPs but I can't find it.
@kossamaras.bsky.social
I want to make some 3PP graphs out of it like I did with the YouGov MRPs but I can't find it.
@kossamaras.bsky.social
Family First will:
– Allow religious schools to fire gay teachers
– Deny women reproductive healthcare options
– Strip rights from gender diverse people
What are the Liberals doing?
I've graphed what that would mean in the extreme case where the Labor voter preferences split evenly.
I've graphed what that would mean in the extreme case where the Labor voter preferences split evenly.
I don't think the market bounce makes sense unless it's anticipated for Trump to at some point back off from the 100+% tariff on Chinese goods and 10% tariffs on everyone else.
I don't think the market bounce makes sense unless it's anticipated for Trump to at some point back off from the 100+% tariff on Chinese goods and 10% tariffs on everyone else.
My question is, how long before much damage is permenant?
Like, if Trump backflipped right now surely the market would bounce nearly totally back immediately?
What about in a month. There'd be more net loss?
What if he sticks to it until after the midterms?
My question is, how long before much damage is permenant?
Like, if Trump backflipped right now surely the market would bounce nearly totally back immediately?
What about in a month. There'd be more net loss?
What if he sticks to it until after the midterms?
I'm doing the independent seats now.
I'm doing the independent seats now.
The Greens really need to perform much better than this in their target seats or they would fall over. The weakness of the Liberals across the board is also a spoiler (if true).
The Greens really need to perform much better than this in their target seats or they would fall over. The weakness of the Liberals across the board is also a spoiler (if true).