Sebastian Karcher
banner
adam42smith.bsky.social
Sebastian Karcher
@adam42smith.bsky.social

Director, Qualitative Data Repository (personal account).
Data, Zotero, Social Science Methods
https://sebastiankarcher.com

Political science 25%
Computer science 23%

I 100% see the concern, especially in Minnesota/Minneapolis. Otoh, if you think of this not as standard US politics but as politics or authoritarianism, thinking about allegiances of local security forces seems important...
Or in other words -- the police may well be the intended audience here

Lawrence Brownlee is really quite something... the Met live Il Puritani broadcast is on right now if you have time to listen, e.g. wqxr.org or likely your local classical radio anywhere in the US
WQXR | New York's Classical Music Radio Station
WQXR - New York Public Radio
wqxr.org

I don't drink coffee on planes much, but Delta is indeedd noticeably better coffee. They also brew Starbucks, which isn't amazing, but very solid esp for drip.

You've gone German!
And yes, you can slice everything. Lengthwise Zucchini for grilling is good, e.g.

wait really, TA? That makes me so sad! I've never seen him but everyone else is so excited about him & his work there :(

They looked in Zoos, so no.

My understanding is that there are trusted folks in BLS who have been quite clear that the data can still be trusted and that they'd also make very clear when they don't think it can be anymore.

This is 2nd hand (i.e. they told other researchers whose judgement I trust) so take with a grain of salt

Props to the LLM (or human) that/who responded with a confident "very large"

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

props to my university btw, this is the way
A truly gonzo Executive Order from the Trump Administration removes US from not just the UN Framework Convention on Climate change, but also the IPCC (!), the IUCN, the IPBES (the IPCC of biodiversity), and all sorts of other organizations. www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United
www.whitehouse.gov

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

Looking for 1-2 papers (and maybe one more discussant) to put together an #APSA2026 panel proposal on recent methodological developments in surveys/experiments (can go either way). Feel free to reach out!

ChatGPT is obv a bad for this.
Here's the thing, though: It's pretty hard to get good results for this type of q from traditional databases. Try it in Pubmed!
Otoh, using the right LLM-based tool, e.g. Elicit, produces good results with a natural language query (tho I'd worry about the summaries):

That "Why?" somehow hits different for "Let's draw some causal graphs"...

Characteristically excellent from Robin. Some of these (like 2&5) are things FLOSS/open infra folks have been saying for a while; might be worthwhile considering reasons for slow progress.
Others (esp 4) are new to me & likely more controversial
I'd like to see some coordination in the open source community to respond to this. The outcome could shape significant funding and strategic moves.

Off the top of my head, there's a few things that I'd like to see in a new European open source strategy. 🧵
The @ec.europa.eu will soon present “a combination of funding and policy measures” to support European open source projects in becoming commercially viable alternatives to proprietary US tech.

Read my article at @euractiv.com:

www.euractiv.com/news/commiss...

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

When this guy wrote his survey of European polls in 1963, he had no idea that he would be thrilling an archivist in 2026. But these charts warm the cockles of my heart.
I'd like to see some coordination in the open source community to respond to this. The outcome could shape significant funding and strategic moves.

Off the top of my head, there's a few things that I'd like to see in a new European open source strategy. 🧵

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

This is traditional!

This is a delightful story as well as impressive science & I love @carlzimmer.com for including this bit (gift link):

www.nytimes.com/2026/01/01/s...

I do know people who take their car to the race track, so this isn't completely out of the question, but probably something that could be addressed.

The guys really, really love their calipers...
"The application...asks users for their height, ancestral background, SAT score and their feelings about entrepreneurs....The system can assess their cheekbone prominence, jaw strength or body-fat percentage from a scanned photo, and analyze their application to estimate an IQ score."

Same here. I was surprised that's the direction in which they went (didn't make it to the actual ideas, survey link timed out).
Is this different in other fields, perhaps? Like medical researchers don't know what to try next?

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

"The application...asks users for their height, ancestral background, SAT score and their feelings about entrepreneurs....The system can assess their cheekbone prominence, jaw strength or body-fat percentage from a scanned photo, and analyze their application to estimate an IQ score."

Yeah, it's very easy to add something to (potential) training data in the chat interfaces. How/how easy to opt out varies by tool (not sure it's even possible for all free ones). Enterprise versions (i.e. a tool your institution provides access to) are typically opted out by default, as are APIs.

It does say "custom AI models" which strongly implies that, but it's one thing they should, certainly in retrospect, have made clearer -- writing emails like this is super tricky bc they can't be too long/complicated.

The boring answer is stand mixer & espresso machine.
The two w the most unexpectedly large impact are pasta roller attachment for KitchenAid & digital kitchen scale
Everybody has two kitchen appliances that will change their life. The problem is, they're different for everybody.
This place needs some Innocuous Discourse pronto. Quote this with a take that’s not political or aggressive

Since several people have complained to the IRB, I'd assume that's the angle this gets resolved under. FWIW, I'm quite convinced that there, too, the researchers are easily in the green legally.
Beyond legality, I find the ethical case against this work weak & problematic, but worth discussing.

I think that's right for fair use - as I say, the boundaries are blurry. But I don't think what the researchers here did even requires fair use.
Analyzing a paper with a computer model doesn't qualify as "reproduce", "prepare derivative work of," or "distribute" (the uses protected by copyright)

I _love_ that you're doing this

#datalibs smoke signal!!!
Please share - @pewresearch.org wants to hire a data archivist who will be an advocate for data users, helping to ensure that our datasets are easy to discover and reuse by researchers, journalists, and the public.
pewtrusts.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/CenterExtern...
Please share - @pewresearch.org wants to hire a data archivist who will be an advocate for data users, helping to ensure that our datasets are easy to discover and reuse by researchers, journalists, and the public.
pewtrusts.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/CenterExtern...