✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
@thecutestcommie.bsky.social
🇵🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼Posts to this account are all sincerely held personal opinions & shouldn't necessarily be taken as statements of fact.
Rural, White, Uneducated, Transsexual Christian Leftist
Rural, White, Uneducated, Transsexual Christian Leftist
Pinned
Jesse Singal is a liar and a fraud of a journalist and I will prove it as an unassailable fact in this thread.
I'll also talk about why I don't think BlueSky moderation will do anything about him afterwards so stick around or maybe just skip to that if you don't want to read the boring details.
I'll also talk about why I don't think BlueSky moderation will do anything about him afterwards so stick around or maybe just skip to that if you don't want to read the boring details.
Don't let this amazing resource get lost or forgotten.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
I haven’t seen this get covered in English yet so let me translate.
Grok is saying that the crematories at Auschwitz’s were conceived as disinfectant chambers, not mass execution and that the law has made it taboo to acknowledge that this is what they were
X is a Nazi site. Get off the Nazi site.
Grok is saying that the crematories at Auschwitz’s were conceived as disinfectant chambers, not mass execution and that the law has made it taboo to acknowledge that this is what they were
X is a Nazi site. Get off the Nazi site.
November 19, 2025 at 3:53 PM
I haven’t seen this get covered in English yet so let me translate.
Grok is saying that the crematories at Auschwitz’s were conceived as disinfectant chambers, not mass execution and that the law has made it taboo to acknowledge that this is what they were
X is a Nazi site. Get off the Nazi site.
Grok is saying that the crematories at Auschwitz’s were conceived as disinfectant chambers, not mass execution and that the law has made it taboo to acknowledge that this is what they were
X is a Nazi site. Get off the Nazi site.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
I turned down an opportunity to appear today on Times Radio opposite ‘someone like Kathleen Stock or Rosie Duffield’ to discuss Geraldine Scott’s Times article based on an apparently leaked version of the EHRC service provision guidance.
November 20, 2025 at 9:57 AM
I turned down an opportunity to appear today on Times Radio opposite ‘someone like Kathleen Stock or Rosie Duffield’ to discuss Geraldine Scott’s Times article based on an apparently leaked version of the EHRC service provision guidance.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
I asked to SEE a copy of the leaked guidance - but no, only the article was available.
I don’t normally turn down an opportunity to speak, but given the nature of the channel, the company and the conditions, this would only be taking part in anti-trans propaganda.
And it is TDOR.
So no thank you.
I don’t normally turn down an opportunity to speak, but given the nature of the channel, the company and the conditions, this would only be taking part in anti-trans propaganda.
And it is TDOR.
So no thank you.
November 20, 2025 at 9:58 AM
I asked to SEE a copy of the leaked guidance - but no, only the article was available.
I don’t normally turn down an opportunity to speak, but given the nature of the channel, the company and the conditions, this would only be taking part in anti-trans propaganda.
And it is TDOR.
So no thank you.
I don’t normally turn down an opportunity to speak, but given the nature of the channel, the company and the conditions, this would only be taking part in anti-trans propaganda.
And it is TDOR.
So no thank you.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
6/ Instead, fearing a legal loss, they chose what they thought would be the easiest way out. As a result, we now have guidance that is almost certainly unlawful and that reinforces gender stereotypes.
November 20, 2025 at 11:16 AM
6/ Instead, fearing a legal loss, they chose what they thought would be the easiest way out. As a result, we now have guidance that is almost certainly unlawful and that reinforces gender stereotypes.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
5/ The EHRC could have said that Schedule 3 is ultimately unworkable, and that the Supreme Court was wrong to rely on a schedule that could easily be amended to produce a uniform meaning contrary to the purpose found in the main body of the Act. They chose not to.
November 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM
5/ The EHRC could have said that Schedule 3 is ultimately unworkable, and that the Supreme Court was wrong to rely on a schedule that could easily be amended to produce a uniform meaning contrary to the purpose found in the main body of the Act. They chose not to.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
4/ The present, unsatisfactory state of the statutory regime means that whether a person is trans can only be established through privacy-invasive litigation. A duty bearer has nothing to rely on except the perceived risk that a user (whether cis or trans) might bring a claim.
November 20, 2025 at 9:22 AM
4/ The present, unsatisfactory state of the statutory regime means that whether a person is trans can only be established through privacy-invasive litigation. A duty bearer has nothing to rely on except the perceived risk that a user (whether cis or trans) might bring a claim.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
3/ The key sentence is “the Court failed to consider […] the consequences arising from the general unavailability of gender history information, as opposed to the narrower issue of whether legal consequences should depend on a trans person holding a gender recognition certificate”.
November 20, 2025 at 9:15 AM
3/ The key sentence is “the Court failed to consider […] the consequences arising from the general unavailability of gender history information, as opposed to the narrower issue of whether legal consequences should depend on a trans person holding a gender recognition certificate”.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
2/ In one of the pre-action letters, I told the EHRC that they would be failing in their duty to monitor the effectiveness of human rights and equality enactments if they pretended that the Supreme Court decision could be made workable without trans people voluntarily waiving their human rights.
November 20, 2025 at 8:59 AM
2/ In one of the pre-action letters, I told the EHRC that they would be failing in their duty to monitor the effectiveness of human rights and equality enactments if they pretended that the Supreme Court decision could be made workable without trans people voluntarily waiving their human rights.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
1/🧵 According to the leak reported by The Times, the EHRC’s draft Code of Practice states that there is no document in this country that proves biological sex, and that trans people may refuse to disclose anything.
I regard this as another success of my legal action.
I regard this as another success of my legal action.
November 20, 2025 at 8:59 AM
1/🧵 According to the leak reported by The Times, the EHRC’s draft Code of Practice states that there is no document in this country that proves biological sex, and that trans people may refuse to disclose anything.
I regard this as another success of my legal action.
I regard this as another success of my legal action.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
1) This is fucked up
Users of r/tallgirls share their experiences of measures intended to target trans people:
www.reddit.com/r/TallGirls/...
www.reddit.com/r/TallGirls/...
From the TallGirls community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the TallGirls community
www.reddit.com
November 20, 2025 at 9:26 AM
1) This is fucked up
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
actually it's worse than i thought. that ehrc guidance means that any woman in the country, cis or trans, can be discriminated against and the proprietor or employer can deflect any legal woes by saying 'well, i mean, i thought she was a tranny'
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is legalising sexism
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is legalising sexism
November 20, 2025 at 12:22 AM
actually it's worse than i thought. that ehrc guidance means that any woman in the country, cis or trans, can be discriminated against and the proprietor or employer can deflect any legal woes by saying 'well, i mean, i thought she was a tranny'
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is legalising sexism
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is legalising sexism
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
women's safety is when the state enforced outdated sexists stereotypes by bringing in laws that lead to discrimination and harassment of any women who don't conform
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
November 20, 2025 at 9:06 AM
women's safety is when the state enforced outdated sexists stereotypes by bringing in laws that lead to discrimination and harassment of any women who don't conform
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
this is going to blow up in labour's face. @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is gonna do this to the cheers of jk rowling and the far right and then it's gonna start impacting cisgender women at scale
they can get away with shit when it only impacts trans ppl but this will hit *all* women as a demographic
they can get away with shit when it only impacts trans ppl but this will hit *all* women as a demographic
women's safety is when the state enforced outdated sexists stereotypes by bringing in laws that lead to discrimination and harassment of any women who don't conform
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social has thrown her lot in with a twitter-brained cult whose only aim is cruelty. they don't care about women 🤷♀️
November 20, 2025 at 9:31 AM
this is going to blow up in labour's face. @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social is gonna do this to the cheers of jk rowling and the far right and then it's gonna start impacting cisgender women at scale
they can get away with shit when it only impacts trans ppl but this will hit *all* women as a demographic
they can get away with shit when it only impacts trans ppl but this will hit *all* women as a demographic
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Surely the EHRC can see how INSANE this sounds?
Right!? 😬
“Under the new guidance, places…will be able to question transgender women over whether they should be using single-sex services based on how they look, their behaviour or concerns raised by others”
Full article 👉 archive.ph/LWfAM
Right!? 😬
“Under the new guidance, places…will be able to question transgender women over whether they should be using single-sex services based on how they look, their behaviour or concerns raised by others”
Full article 👉 archive.ph/LWfAM
November 19, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Surely the EHRC can see how INSANE this sounds?
Right!? 😬
“Under the new guidance, places…will be able to question transgender women over whether they should be using single-sex services based on how they look, their behaviour or concerns raised by others”
Full article 👉 archive.ph/LWfAM
Right!? 😬
“Under the new guidance, places…will be able to question transgender women over whether they should be using single-sex services based on how they look, their behaviour or concerns raised by others”
Full article 👉 archive.ph/LWfAM
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
What happens if the end goal of your wacko movement is “And then the public will rise up to support us” but the public remains indifferent, no matter how thickly TV and radio are blanketed in your drivel? This is what happens, if you have a squillionaire friend who can put her thumb on the scales.
November 20, 2025 at 8:03 AM
What happens if the end goal of your wacko movement is “And then the public will rise up to support us” but the public remains indifferent, no matter how thickly TV and radio are blanketed in your drivel? This is what happens, if you have a squillionaire friend who can put her thumb on the scales.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Would the the conveyor belt of squillionaire-funded vexatious litigation or the participation of the national equality body lobbying government be necessary, if the matter was clear cut and resolved in the minds of the public? No, obviously it would not be necessary. Which tells us things.
November 20, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Would the the conveyor belt of squillionaire-funded vexatious litigation or the participation of the national equality body lobbying government be necessary, if the matter was clear cut and resolved in the minds of the public? No, obviously it would not be necessary. Which tells us things.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Again, it is not like nobody noticed what the anti-trans wackos are or said publicly that they are vicious bigots driven by malice. That’s exactly why they swiftly became the cause celebre of every fascist crackpot in the world.
November 20, 2025 at 7:53 AM
Again, it is not like nobody noticed what the anti-trans wackos are or said publicly that they are vicious bigots driven by malice. That’s exactly why they swiftly became the cause celebre of every fascist crackpot in the world.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Of course, the only way to get around the problem the national equality body has identified - you can’t tell, just by looking at people - could most efficiently be resolved by legally compelling the targeted minority group to wear an identifying badge of some kind.
November 20, 2025 at 7:51 AM
Of course, the only way to get around the problem the national equality body has identified - you can’t tell, just by looking at people - could most efficiently be resolved by legally compelling the targeted minority group to wear an identifying badge of some kind.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
The core aim of the Terf movement - a tiny number of newspaper columnists who melted the brains of middle aged reactionaries - was always to encourage maximum public hostility against transgender people, and give them the impunity to act upon it.
November 20, 2025 at 7:50 AM
The core aim of the Terf movement - a tiny number of newspaper columnists who melted the brains of middle aged reactionaries - was always to encourage maximum public hostility against transgender people, and give them the impunity to act upon it.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Something I remind myself of about the trans rights fight is the asymmetry of what's required to change someone's mind:
Transphobes: A decade-long, billion dollar, globally coordinated campaign of disinformation, lawfare, and media capture.
Trans people: Meeting a trans person.
We'll win, folx 🏳️⚧️✊
Transphobes: A decade-long, billion dollar, globally coordinated campaign of disinformation, lawfare, and media capture.
Trans people: Meeting a trans person.
We'll win, folx 🏳️⚧️✊
What happens if the end goal of your wacko movement is “And then the public will rise up to support us” but the public remains indifferent, no matter how thickly TV and radio are blanketed in your drivel? This is what happens, if you have a squillionaire friend who can put her thumb on the scales.
November 20, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Something I remind myself of about the trans rights fight is the asymmetry of what's required to change someone's mind:
Transphobes: A decade-long, billion dollar, globally coordinated campaign of disinformation, lawfare, and media capture.
Trans people: Meeting a trans person.
We'll win, folx 🏳️⚧️✊
Transphobes: A decade-long, billion dollar, globally coordinated campaign of disinformation, lawfare, and media capture.
Trans people: Meeting a trans person.
We'll win, folx 🏳️⚧️✊
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
A country that tries to regulate gender expression is totalitarian.
Ironically, totalitarianism being one of the things that is not allowed to be a protected belief.
Ironically, totalitarianism being one of the things that is not allowed to be a protected belief.
November 20, 2025 at 8:04 AM
A country that tries to regulate gender expression is totalitarian.
Ironically, totalitarianism being one of the things that is not allowed to be a protected belief.
Ironically, totalitarianism being one of the things that is not allowed to be a protected belief.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
Tldr. yes it's going to be illegal for you to piss soon if you're trans, basically.
not criminal illegal. civil illegal. it only becomes a criminal illegal if you for eg refuse to leave when asked because then it becomes trespass etc. An important thing to know in the coming months, I assume.
not criminal illegal. civil illegal. it only becomes a criminal illegal if you for eg refuse to leave when asked because then it becomes trespass etc. An important thing to know in the coming months, I assume.
November 20, 2025 at 7:54 AM
Tldr. yes it's going to be illegal for you to piss soon if you're trans, basically.
not criminal illegal. civil illegal. it only becomes a criminal illegal if you for eg refuse to leave when asked because then it becomes trespass etc. An important thing to know in the coming months, I assume.
not criminal illegal. civil illegal. it only becomes a criminal illegal if you for eg refuse to leave when asked because then it becomes trespass etc. An important thing to know in the coming months, I assume.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
and like... bigots made it no secret what they were actively pursuing this whole time.
It could have been stopped dead in its tracks. Instead they flourished under a tory government and faced no resistance whatsoever under a Labour government.
thus, here we are.
It could have been stopped dead in its tracks. Instead they flourished under a tory government and faced no resistance whatsoever under a Labour government.
thus, here we are.
November 20, 2025 at 7:51 AM
and like... bigots made it no secret what they were actively pursuing this whole time.
It could have been stopped dead in its tracks. Instead they flourished under a tory government and faced no resistance whatsoever under a Labour government.
thus, here we are.
It could have been stopped dead in its tracks. Instead they flourished under a tory government and faced no resistance whatsoever under a Labour government.
thus, here we are.
Reposted by ✝️𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲 (PEOPLE ARE MACHINES)🦄
and it will be a human rights scandal and a source of great embarrassment for the UK on the international stage.
But short of changing legislation, that is what is going to happen pretty imminently. Govt and EHRC can only delay for so long.
But short of changing legislation, that is what is going to happen pretty imminently. Govt and EHRC can only delay for so long.
November 20, 2025 at 7:49 AM
and it will be a human rights scandal and a source of great embarrassment for the UK on the international stage.
But short of changing legislation, that is what is going to happen pretty imminently. Govt and EHRC can only delay for so long.
But short of changing legislation, that is what is going to happen pretty imminently. Govt and EHRC can only delay for so long.