I was watching it when it got yanked - but bootlegs abound. www.theglobeandmail.com/world/us-pol...
I was watching it when it got yanked - but bootlegs abound. www.theglobeandmail.com/world/us-pol...
Now describing US knowledge of CECOT's torture practices, followed by footage of Trump praising those practices.
What’s new here is the close “coordination” with the “Department of War” in determining the “risk” poised by these wind farms. And the threat to “cancel.”
What’s new here is the close “coordination” with the “Department of War” in determining the “risk” poised by these wind farms. And the threat to “cancel.”
zurl.co/sqJzt
zurl.co/sqJzt
Doing all kinds of things, calling them nation-building, cooperative federalism or a new industrial strategy without explaining what they mean isn't any better.
Doing all kinds of things, calling them nation-building, cooperative federalism or a new industrial strategy without explaining what they mean isn't any better.
Like Do You Understand What That Fucking Means???
Like Do You Understand What That Fucking Means???
But this is different.
This panel was *chaired* by Premier Danielle Smith.
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
But this is different.
This panel was *chaired* by Premier Danielle Smith.
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
It's like Scholarly Communication has been injected with misinformation bombs. Events are totally out of control. No one has a handle on its extent. And, there's no plan to stop it.
@benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Checking new manuscripts today I reviewed a paper attributing 2 papers to me I did not write. A daft thing for an author to do of course. But intrigued I web searched up one of the titles and that's when it got real weird...
It's like Scholarly Communication has been injected with misinformation bombs. Events are totally out of control. No one has a handle on its extent. And, there's no plan to stop it.
@benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Carney focuses on the constitutional questions: the confidence of the Commons.
Poilievre focuses on a normative question: legitimacy and fair play.
A good example of why we shouldn't treat constitutional conventions as moral rules.
History shows that shifts like this can happen faster than expected: in the early 20th-century US, horses and mules virtually vanished from roads in under 30 years.
cdn.sanity.io/files/lrxd4j...
www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...