Ryan Doerfler
banner
ryandoerfler.bsky.social
Ryan Doerfler
@ryandoerfler.bsky.social
Professor at Harvard Law
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
December 25, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Or you might call them "camps" where people are to be "concentrated" until they are deported.
www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
ICE documents reveal plan to hold 80,000 immigrants in warehouses
The Trump administration wants to build seven large-scale deportation hubs to speed up deportations, internal ICE documents show.
www.washingtonpost.com
December 24, 2025 at 5:40 PM
If the Court ends up running for cover as this whole thing falls apart, DO NOT FORGET.
You do not, under any circumstances, gotta hand it to the Supreme Court
December 23, 2025 at 10:06 PM
While limited in the ways @stevevladeck.bsky.social notes, that the Court even imposes this roadblock (speed bump?) is more than it has been doing. Consistent with the general increase in GOP anxiety in recent weeks.
Over public dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, #SCOTUS refuses to allow President Trump to deploy federalized National Guard troops into and around Chicago.

This is a major loss for President Trump, even if, per Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence, it’s temporary and on narrow legal Q:
www.supremecourt.gov
December 23, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
“there are only 7 full-time book critics left in the US: three at NYT ( Jacobs, Garner, Szalai), 2 at WaPo(Rothfeld, Charles), 1 each at WSJ (Sacks), NY mag (Chu), Slate (Miller)

more people have walked on the moon than write book reviews for a living”

worldliteraturetoday.org/2025/septemb...
Criticism Is Literature. Why Is It Vanishing?, by Adam Morgan
What do the best book reviews do? What is the current state of the critical ecosystem? Chicago Review of Books founder Adam Morgan takes stock of book reviewing in the US.
worldliteraturetoday.org
December 23, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Some end-of-year reflections from me on the State of Things newsletter.thedriftmag.com/p/surviving-...
Surviving the intellectual apocalypse
Why you should subscribe
newsletter.thedriftmag.com
December 23, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Posted it
CANCELLED 60 MINUTES CECOT DOC
YouTube video by eoin higgins
youtube.com
December 22, 2025 at 11:09 PM
One thing I find very frustrating is how often people ignore years of detailed writing on reform strategies for the here and now by saying “Excuse me, didn’t you say we need to abandon the Constitution?” (1/7)
December 22, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Hi all: reupping my perennial call for indexing and editing clients for Spring / Summer 2026. It might be my last year doing this work, so get it while it's hot! Email at sosment@uchicago.edu for rate and availability. Feel free to share!
December 22, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Thoughtful response by @stevevladeck.bsky.social One observation, and potentially a basis of progressive consensus, is that the vision offered by me and @samuelmoyn.bsky.social and others is not one of a world in which there are “no checks” on presidential administrations. (1/6)
"Pulling the Supreme Court back from the cliff is something progressives should view as far preferable to the alternative—where it may not just be the Court that gets pushed over the edge and into oblivion, but our entire constitutional (and democratic) order."

Me in today's issue of "One First":
198. Progressive Judicial Institutionalism
There's important daylight between those who are critical of the present degree of judicial power in the United States in general and those who are critical of the current Supreme Court, specifically.
www.stevevladeck.com
December 22, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
I feel like "academic hiring" discourse is always kind of downstream of the fact that in the 50s we started building a giant public system to make a college education almost universally available and in the 80s and 90s we started taking it apart to go back to the only-the-rich model
December 20, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
NEW: The FBI has launched "domestic terrorism" investigations into anti-ICE activity across the US. Some cases are under Trump's NSPM-7 order to crackdown on "anti-fascism" and "anti-Americanism."

Docs obtained by @propertyofthepeople.org + shared w/ Guardian include FBI map of cases in 30+ states:
Revealed: FBI opened domestic terrorism investigations into anti-ICE activity across US
Internal report shared with Guardian shows FBI has launched cases in 23 regions, some linked to Trump memo on thwarting ‘terroristic activities’
www.theguardian.com
December 19, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Translation for the non-geeks: Courts are making stuff up to let Trump's Admin avoid accountability for violating the law.
Pulling together my materials for next semester's appropriations law course, I came across this stunning fact: Dalton v. Specter has been cited by only 266 case since it was decided in 1994. Fifty-seven of those citations came in 2025 alone. I'm a geek, but that's a nutty citation pattern.
December 19, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Some of these redactions are almost like modern art
December 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM
I read the cited poll slightly differently, but I think the better characterization probably is that popular support has collapsed *since Dobbs*, so helpful correction.
December 19, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
Sam and Ryan are right. But I'd go further. It's not just the supreme court that must be replaced. We must replace the entire notion of a democratic order where courts have the final word on the meaning of the constitution. 1/ www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
It’s time to accept that the US supreme court is illegitimate and must be replaced | Ryan Doerfler and Samuel Moyn
We need to remake the US high court so Americans don’t suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule
www.theguardian.com
December 19, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Reposted by Ryan Doerfler
I wrote about a conference marking the culmination of tens of millions of dollars of philanthropic spending to transcend neoliberalism. lpeproject.org/blog/post-ne...
December 19, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Agree, but I also think it's reasonable that appeals to the law are often heard as calls to the manager given the recent orientation of Democratic politics. The burden on all of us (which Jamal understands) is to explain simultaneously how to remake our institutions so that law actually matters.
NB: When I, a professor of law, profess that an act is unlawful, I am not doing it to inform the lawbreaker, but rather to inform you, the reader.

So the question “what, like you think he cares?” is inapposite. The question is whether *you* care. I think you should, which is why I bother.
December 18, 2025 at 9:43 PM