PindsvineCorp 🦔
LightNews LightNews
banner
pindsvinecorp.bsky.social
PindsvineCorp 🦔
@pindsvinecorp.bsky.social
110 followers 240 following 530 posts
Lefty Liberal. Dog Mum. Fat lady (sometimes about town).
Posts Replies Media Videos
pindsvinecorp.bsky.social
Please pay attention to this:
open.substack.com/pub/tashthin...
Reform's Handmaid's Tale Vision for British Women...
On my LBC show this Saturday, I spoke about some of the Handmaid Tale style policies and rhetoric which has emerged from the Reform party recently.
open.substack.com
February 16, 2026 at 8:39 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
larryandpaul.bsky.social
⛔️ UPDATE: All The Men Arrested So Far In #Epstein Scandal:
February 13, 2026 at 12:58 PM
pindsvinecorp.bsky.social
Our public services aren’t for a secretive profit-hungry US tech firm. Sign the petition to tell the Government to scrap all contracts with secretive US tech firm Palantir. you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/st...
Stop Palantir taking over our public services!
Our public services aren’t for a secretive profit-hungry US tech firm. Sign the petition to tell the Government to scrap all contracts with secretive US tech firm Palantir.
you.38degrees.org.uk
February 13, 2026 at 8:37 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
heldutson.bsky.social
Something compelled me to make this
A screenshot of a mocked-up Guardian headline, which reads: "Ignore the smears: I was never the one who ate a full tub of Lurpack off the kitchen counter." The byline is: "My dog." And there's a picture of my dog, posing with a serious expression, like a journalist. She is a black labrador type dog with brown eyes, grey muzzle and shiny, silky fur on her face, wearing a pink collar. Underneath the headline continues: "Listen, I'm a good girl. I don't know how butter stealers thrive in our political culture, but it's clear there was a failure of moral seriousness." There's then a link to another article, headlined: "Footage of Lola eating the butter, which cost her owners £300, was captured on a dog cam." It's a parody of this article from Wes Streeting in the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/09/peter-mandelson-wes-streeting-vetting-moral-seriousness
February 10, 2026 at 10:57 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
popeguilty.bsky.social
a picture of Usha Vance with the following alt text: Usha Vance, in profile from the shoulders up, in a red dress, with her husband's beard and blue suit and red tie beside her. On her face is the expression of someone who married the most ambitious person she could find at Yale and as a result is now listening to a live performance by Kid Rock.
February 5, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
lauralexx.bsky.social
But… but is there *ANY* way this could be a woman’s fault…?
February 7, 2026 at 10:53 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
lilgemgem.bsky.social
This amused me greatly 😂 especially the fox painting 😂

Thank yoooo @cheekybudgie.bsky.social
February 7, 2026 at 1:03 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
dr-peter-olusoga.bsky.social
We kind of SHOULD be overwhelmed right now!

There's a lot of overwhelming stuff going on, so if you're struggling with that, it's not a YOU problem...

Continued below...
February 5, 2026 at 4:43 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
radleybalko.bsky.social
The woke scolds are trying to make this about racism. But Musk is right. It's about historical and scientific integrity. When the God of Thunder disguises himself as a swan to seduce and fuck a queen and the resulting baby hatches from an egg, *of course* the baby will be white. It's just science.
Elon Musk claims Christopher Nolan has lost ‘integrity’ over The Odyssey casting
Lupita Nyong’o is reportedly set to play Helen of Troy in Nolan’s upcoming adaptation of Homer’s epic poem
www.independent.co.uk
February 2, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
weeder.bsky.social
A grey blue washed image of a bearded young ish white guy looking into the mirror all serious with his palm pressed against it. A serif font title reads: DID I JUST ARGUE WITH A JOKE? A semi opaque navy snoot near the bottom bears the bluesky logo and the text PART OF A BLUESKY EDUCATIONAL SERIES
October 23, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
mickeykuhns.bsky.social
A message from Greenland…
January 26, 2026 at 3:07 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
chuckdpe.bsky.social
Gestapo
January 25, 2026 at 7:40 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
"And if my parents had made a different choice, I wouldn't be here today leading Congress into helpless irrelevancy, providing cover for a brutal American dictator, setting the stage for World War III, and ... hang on, hang on, let me start again."
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 24d
Mike Johnson: "I was the product of an unplanned teen pregnancy exactly one year before Roe. A lot of people tried to convince my very young parents that they should just take care of that problem. But I am eternally grateful that they allowed me the chance at life."
January 23, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
jameskelleher.pilcrow.ie
Shabana Mahmood here, whose “ultimate vision” is to turn the world into a prison
January 20, 2026 at 9:05 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
atrupar.com
Trump: "There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place. And they are losers. One thing I've noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses, and the worse that country is doing. I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China."
January 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
pindsvinesteve.bsky.social
Trump says he’s soon going to a “beautiful place in Switzerland”

Please let it be Dignitas. #Davos #Trump
January 20, 2026 at 7:58 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
iandunt.bsky.social
Well fuck me backwards what a sight. I can't believe that was only an hour and fifteen. It felt like seven years. I hope you all enjoyed watching Robert Jenrick's soul leave his decaying fetid fucking human body.
January 15, 2026 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
profrachelgan.bsky.social
Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.
Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial. I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.
January 12, 2026 at 8:59 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
coldwarsteve.bsky.social
January 11, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
dorianlynskey.bsky.social
If I Stop Reading Mein Kampf and Writing “No!” in the Margins, Then the Nazis Will Win
January 10, 2026 at 1:07 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
samwollaston.bsky.social
January 6, 2026 at 10:50 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
saulstaniforth.bsky.social
Starmer making the point that if Trump isn't stopped now he'll seize Greenland next.

Oh sorry, he's talking about Putin.
January 4, 2026 at 10:25 AM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
wefail.bsky.social
Portrait of Sir Keir Starmer. 🇬🇧💪
January 4, 2026 at 12:07 PM
pindsvinecorp.bsky.social
At least someone's talking about it! @pindsvinesteve.bsky.social
happytoast.co.uk HappyToast @happytoast.co.uk · Jan 1
If the BBC want to avoid scandal they probably shouldn't give someone a ladder on Gladiators and then hand them the trophy. Shocking scenes.
January 1, 2026 at 2:39 PM
Reposted by PindsvineCorp 🦔
davidleavitt.bsky.social
Shoutout to all my fellow Y2K survivors
December 31, 2025 at 8:33 PM