John Kennedy
banner
micefearboggis.bsky.social
John Kennedy
@micefearboggis.bsky.social

Occasional climate scientist, diagram monkey, probabilistic historian, science anti-communicator. All views and opinions are my own. This is not, sadly, a promise of novelty: it’s a disclaimer. He/him. https://www.jkclimate.fr/ .. more

Environmental science 43%
Geography 15%

Monthly climate dashboard

Now with all global temperature datasets updated to September or October.

www.jkclimate.fr/MonthlyDashb...

In a sense, yes, it's just taxonomy but taxonomies reflect some kind of underlying order and two things (or at least two things) underlie a taxonomy of fallacies: logic and human brains.

Reposted by John Kennedy

At some point I played my last game of chasing with my friends in school, without realising it would be our last game.

However, that means one of us is still IT, and doesn't even know. Forever chasing people who don't know they're being chased.

I think about this all the time. Is it me? Am I IT?

Thanks. I daresay my thinking wasn't very clear on this matter. I was thinking of named "fallacies" - e.g. the base rate "fallacy" - and what it means to be one of those rather than just a common or garden failure of logic, reasoning or factualityness...

I shall add it to my reading list. I was wondering, I suppose, how systematic or common an error needed to be to establish itself as a fallacy. I feel like I see new fallacies all the time, but they don't all seem very systematic.

That's the sense in which I'm familiar with them. I wondered at what point a distinct pattern forms from the many ways wrongness can manifest itself.

What a strange graph. Remind me what happens to something "per capita" when the capitas are all extinct and therefore tend rapidly to zero?

I feel like with one small change this is perfectly true (though less amusing). It will make a life changing difference that nobody notices. A skill of the artist lies in seeing what needs to be done and then doing it, but the result will be something almost everyone can appreciate.

What distinguishes a "fallacy" from simply being wrong?

Reposted by John Kennedy

WMO's #StateOfClimate Update 2025.

It combines consolidated data for 2024 with preliminary data for 2025 to where available.

Watch to find 5 key facts from the report, read the full report to find out the latest on all key climate indicators:

🔗 https://bit.ly/4qZR52q

Some datasets - like NOAAGlobalTemp - can't currently be updated due to the US government shutdown.

End of thread

Antarctic sea ice extent remains low after the maximum of the seasonal cycle in September (3rd lowest on record).

Slow growth of Arctic sea ice in the past few days has left Arctic sea ice extent at a near-record low for the time of year.

September and October were warm enough to nudge the year-to-date average global temp up after a slow fall from the record warm January. 2025 remains on course to be the second or third warmest year on record though given how close it is, it might end up a split decision.

October continues the run of months that exceed anything seen in the observed record before June 2023. The only exception was February 2025. The warmest, second warmest, and now third warmest Octobers were 2023, 2024 and 2025.

Monthly global temperature anomalies increased in October (in ERA5 at least). Yesterday, I was asked whether the brewing La Nina would lead to a drop in global temperature. It might yet, but global temperature typically lags changes in the tropical Pacific.

Reposted by Du Toit

Quasi monthly update of the monthly climate dashboard

Update with:
• preliminary October data
• smaller files for faster loading
• bug fix for overlong plot titles

Some things to look out for, a short 🧵

www.jkclimate.fr/MonthlyDashb...
Bit late to this but it's such a clever piece of AI criticism, developing a literary critique of Sam Altman's auto-metafiction story as a way to explore the grave threats to the "intellectual infrastructure" of the humanities - and HE more broadly - posed by AI lareviewofbooks.org/article/lite...
Literature Is Not a Vibe: On ChatGPT and the Humanities | Los Angeles Review of Books
Rachele Dini discusses OpenAI’s “A Machine-Shaped Hand” and an academic sector in crisis.
lareviewofbooks.org

That's all I have in my folders

Reposted by John Kennedy

Artist be like if I shift this line 0.05 cm to the left, increase overlay by 2%, and move this character’s head slightly by 3° will make a life changing difference that everyone notices

Reposted by John Kennedy

“Why Bill Gates’ climate memo is being celebrated by skeptics while frustrating scientists" | Article by Ryan M. Katz-Rosene for @us.theconversation.com:

theconversation.com/why-bill-gat...
Why Bill Gates’ climate memo is being celebrated by skeptics while frustrating scientists
Gates recently called for a ‘strategic pivot’ in climate strategy. That appears to have hit a nerve.
theconversation.com

Poets. Linocut on recycled paper.
📣 #StateOfClimate Update 2025 is out now

🌡️ From January to August 2025, average temperature was +1.42°C hotter than pre-industrial level, on track to be second or third hottest year on record.

🔗 Press release: https://bit.ly/3LoawS9

🔗 Full report: https://bit.ly/4qZR52q
Reactions to the "debunking" of the original 1956 cognitive dissonance work baffles me. A whole area doesn't die just bec the first work is faulty. That's novelty bias & theory ownership in psych talking. Mendelian genetics did not die when Mendel's original results were found too good to be true.

That's wonderful! Thanks. I worried now that I read this and completely forgot it, but I don't think I have.

Reposted by John Kennedy

📣 #StateOfClimate Update 2025 is out now!

The update combines consolidated data for the year 2024 with preliminary data for 2025 to date where available.

Press release: https://bit.ly/3LoawS9

Full report: https://bit.ly/4qZR52q

Freud certainly would have.