J.M. Berger
banner
jmberger.com
J.M. Berger
@jmberger.com
I wrote the book on extremism. It's called "Extremism." PhD in criminology.

https://www.jmberger.com/

► EXTREMISM @mitpress http://amzn.to/2BKXLgU
► OPTIMAL: A dystopian novel http://amzn.to/3aKYZ99

Commission on AMZ links
Pinned
I write about extremism, with a side order of bad things happening online. I write books and do other stuff, but I would mainly like to write books. You can support this goal by reading them and telling people about them and adapting them into shows for Netflix.

My books:

www.jmberger.com/books
J.M. BERGER, AUTHOR - Books
EXTREMISM
www.jmberger.com
Reposted by J.M. Berger
I mean the entire premise of a constitution is that it constrains the ruling powers. That’s why you have it!

It’s just goofy to then be like, “eh, when the Framers wrote that they didn’t think about how we’d come up with excuses to not enforce it!”

That’s on us! We’re making a choice here!
November 11, 2025 at 7:11 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
It’s really kind of weird to have a putative constitutional democracy that specifically bans the exact thing the President is doing right now—the facts are not in dispute—and just be like, “whelp, guess it can’t be enforced!”
The Emoluments Clauses, Explained
The framers wanted to insulate the president and federal officials from corrupting influences, but a new law is needed to ensure effective enforcement.
www.brennancenter.org
November 11, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
And he's totally setting the stage to disregard a Supreme Court loss claiming doing so would present a "national security" threat.
Oh, so he totally stole the money
November 11, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Joyce Carol Oates should say he can't do backflips off the roof next
November 11, 2025 at 5:41 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
If you're bleeding internally you just uhh call around and compare health care plans. Make a budget spreadsheet and see what you can afford. Do I have to spell it out for you. I have a ballroom to build
November 11, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
history will ultimately decide this but i think joyce carol oates might have just landed the most devastating burn in human history. like the death star trench run of posting
November 10, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
SNAP embarrassed him. So now he's against SNAP. SNAP is now the James Comey of government assistance programs.
President Trump criticized the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during a Fox News interview tonight, saying people "get it automatically now so the number is many times what it should be, it's disgraceful."
Trump says "we can reform" SNAP
"SNAP is supposed to be if you are down and out," Trump said on Fox News this evening.
www.axios.com
November 11, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
If the outcomes aren't the most important thing, it's not even politics. Politics is literally about the outcomes. What he's describing here is cosplaying.
November 11, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
omfg
November 10, 2025 at 6:31 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Counterpoint:
November 11, 2025 at 3:22 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
November 11, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
November 11, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
I just read The Blaze’s article, and if they’re wrong it seems like they could be in big trouble. They gave extensive personal details about the person they claim is the bomber. Based on a 94% match.
Pro-Trump media went wild for a bombshell exposé claiming the Jan. 6th pipe bomber was a Capitol Police officer with CIA ties.

But now the story looks shaky, tweets are getting deleted, and the story's backers are running for cover. My @thebulwark.com newsletter: www.thebulwark.com/p/the-blaze-...
The Blaze’s Pipe-Bomb Bombshell Appears to Bomb
The right-wing outlet claimed to solve the Jan. 6th pipe-bomb mystery. Things quickly looked less certain.
www.thebulwark.com
November 11, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
*Women receive substantially lower "potential" ratings despite receiving higher performance ratings
*Differences in potential ratings account for half of the gender promotion gap
*Women’s lower potential ratings do not reflect future performance: women subsequently outperform male colleagues
November 10, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Wow: Per Hamdi's legal team, his only charge was a visa overstay — after Trump revoked his visa.

Despite DHS tweeting that Hamdi supported terrorism, they never charged him with any criminality.

In other words: Trump revoked a journalist's visa, so agents could arrest him for overstaying his visa.
NEW: British journalist Sami Hamdi is being released from US detention.

Trump administration agents detained him two weeks ago at the San Francisco airport — hours after he addressed an event, where he urged US leaders to take an “America First” approach rather than “Israel First.”
November 10, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
It’s okay because the Republicans promised to hold this exact same vote in a month
UPDATE: The Senate votes 53-47 to shoot down the Baldwin amendment to extend ACA funds for 1 year. A party-line vote with every Republican rejecting it.
An important vote in this series: Tammy Baldwin’s proposal to extend ACA expiring funds for 1 year. It’s structured as a motion to table (i.e. scrap it from the amendment tree). But it’ll show the appetite (or lack thereof) in the Senate to address this issue.
November 11, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Jesus fucking Christ! Everybody already knows where they stand! It's not a secret, they say it all the time!
Steve Inskeep: You think the Republicans voting with you here will not only agree to these measures, but actually try to do something if the administration ignores them?

Sen Cortez Masto: If they go back on their word, then the American public will know where the Republicans stand.
November 11, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Glad we're all working together to reopen the government for the good of the peo... D'oh!

www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/u...
Spending Bill Would Pave Way for Senators to Sue Over Phone Searches
www.nytimes.com
November 10, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
JFC is this bad. Straight up cash transfer to the shadiest Republican senators and an assault on the rule of law.
November 11, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Trump’s pardon for allies who tried to subvert 2020 election is a permission slip to do it again, critics warn

www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
Trump’s pardon for allies who tried to subvert 2020 election is a permission slip to do it again, critics warn
The language in the pardon also underscores that Trump’s clemency is not limited to people named in the document.
www.politico.com
November 11, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
You are 61, you have had a heart bypass, a knee replacement. Here's $2000. Get negotiating.
Trump: "I want the money to go into an account for people where they buy their own health insurance. It's so good. The insurance will be better. It'll cost less. Everybody is gonna be happy. They're gonna feel like entrepreneurs. They're actually able to go out & negotiate their own insurance"
November 11, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Ah, creating a legal entitlement for $500K for some elderly millionaires because they being investigated for their role in an insurrection *in exchange for* a show vote to make health care affordable.
Look at this new outrage. To open govt, we're retroactively letting 8 Senators sue for $500K each over having had their J6 phone toll records looked at. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/u...
Spending Bill Would Pave Way for Senators to Sue Over Phone Searches
www.nytimes.com
November 11, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
A small number of free downloads are being made available of A Conversation with Max Taylor (in Terrorism & Political Violence) at:
www.tandfonline.com/eprint/ZTJX4...
A Conversation with Professor Max Taylor
Published in Terrorism and Political Violence (Ahead of Print, 2025)
www.tandfonline.com
November 11, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Huh
UPDATE: The Senate votes 53-47 to shoot down the Baldwin amendment to extend ACA funds for 1 year. A party-line vote with every Republican rejecting it.
An important vote in this series: Tammy Baldwin’s proposal to extend ACA expiring funds for 1 year. It’s structured as a motion to table (i.e. scrap it from the amendment tree). But it’ll show the appetite (or lack thereof) in the Senate to address this issue.
November 11, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Reposted by J.M. Berger
Texas A&M reinventing "prior restraints"

www.texastribune.org/2025/11/10/t...
November 10, 2025 at 10:56 PM