NA is a delight
@itsnancyann.bsky.social
First of all, I’m a delight…
Pissed off white woman. Mom. Advocate.
IL - NY🗽- CA🌉 - AZ🌵
Pissed off white woman. Mom. Advocate.
IL - NY🗽- CA🌉 - AZ🌵
Reposted by NA is a delight
That one person can drag us into a war without consulting or even notifying Congress, or our allies, or fully explaining to the American people why this is necessary, is absolutely bonkers.
Reminder that Congress has the power to stop all of this. Where the hell are they?
Reminder that Congress has the power to stop all of this. Where the hell are they?
January 3, 2026 at 8:01 PM
That one person can drag us into a war without consulting or even notifying Congress, or our allies, or fully explaining to the American people why this is necessary, is absolutely bonkers.
Reminder that Congress has the power to stop all of this. Where the hell are they?
Reminder that Congress has the power to stop all of this. Where the hell are they?
Reposted by NA is a delight
Anne Applebaum spoke with María Corina Machado in 2024 about the Venezuelan opposition leader’s fight for democracy.
In October, Appplebaum argued that Machado deserved the Nobel Peace Prize she won last year, and why popular participation matters:
In October, Appplebaum argued that Machado deserved the Nobel Peace Prize she won last year, and why popular participation matters:
Why María Corina Machado Deserved the Nobel Peace Prize
The Venezuelan opposition leader shows why participation matters.
bit.ly
January 3, 2026 at 8:01 PM
Anne Applebaum spoke with María Corina Machado in 2024 about the Venezuelan opposition leader’s fight for democracy.
In October, Appplebaum argued that Machado deserved the Nobel Peace Prize she won last year, and why popular participation matters:
In October, Appplebaum argued that Machado deserved the Nobel Peace Prize she won last year, and why popular participation matters:
Reposted by NA is a delight
Trump has just announced he is going to RUN another country (with or without boots on the ground) to ensure oil flows for US companies.
Yes, there’s still people - including in Latin America - pretending this is about Maduro winning elections or not.
How is a Trump occupation any more legitimate?
Yes, there’s still people - including in Latin America - pretending this is about Maduro winning elections or not.
How is a Trump occupation any more legitimate?
January 3, 2026 at 5:20 PM
Trump has just announced he is going to RUN another country (with or without boots on the ground) to ensure oil flows for US companies.
Yes, there’s still people - including in Latin America - pretending this is about Maduro winning elections or not.
How is a Trump occupation any more legitimate?
Yes, there’s still people - including in Latin America - pretending this is about Maduro winning elections or not.
How is a Trump occupation any more legitimate?
Reposted by NA is a delight
Inflation is destroying America
Millions are losing health insurance
The Epstein files exposed how the inequities in our legal system favor the rich
And Jack Smith’s deposition shows the extent of Trump’s crimes
Seems like a great time to distract us by starting an illegal war against Venezuela
Millions are losing health insurance
The Epstein files exposed how the inequities in our legal system favor the rich
And Jack Smith’s deposition shows the extent of Trump’s crimes
Seems like a great time to distract us by starting an illegal war against Venezuela
Rep. Seth Moulton: "This is insane. What the hell are we doing? ... this is illegal."
January 3, 2026 at 7:31 PM
Inflation is destroying America
Millions are losing health insurance
The Epstein files exposed how the inequities in our legal system favor the rich
And Jack Smith’s deposition shows the extent of Trump’s crimes
Seems like a great time to distract us by starting an illegal war against Venezuela
Millions are losing health insurance
The Epstein files exposed how the inequities in our legal system favor the rich
And Jack Smith’s deposition shows the extent of Trump’s crimes
Seems like a great time to distract us by starting an illegal war against Venezuela
Reposted by NA is a delight
The “peace” President has started a war.
He'll start a war to:
1. Distract from the Epstein Files
2. Steal oil
3. Justify emergency powers
4. Justify use of the AEA for deportation/internment
5. Help the drug lord he just pardoned
1. Distract from the Epstein Files
2. Steal oil
3. Justify emergency powers
4. Justify use of the AEA for deportation/internment
5. Help the drug lord he just pardoned
January 3, 2026 at 6:20 PM
The “peace” President has started a war.
Reposted by NA is a delight
They "soft admit" attacking Venezuela to steal its oil. They're lying about caring about democracy. They're hiding how much distracting from Epstein has to do with this. They're lying about caring about drug trafficking. They're hiding how much Trump's vanity had to do with this.
January 3, 2026 at 7:35 PM
They "soft admit" attacking Venezuela to steal its oil. They're lying about caring about democracy. They're hiding how much distracting from Epstein has to do with this. They're lying about caring about drug trafficking. They're hiding how much Trump's vanity had to do with this.
Reposted by NA is a delight
This is a FIVE ALARM FIRE🔥
What Next ?
Who Next?
As millions of Americans here in our Country are suffering, Loss of Healthcare Insurance, Loss of Jobs, and
Loss of Childcare
YES..AFFORDABILITY
Cost of Living
Cost of Groceries
He will now waste millions of tax dollars to
Distract EPSTEIN
What Next ?
Who Next?
As millions of Americans here in our Country are suffering, Loss of Healthcare Insurance, Loss of Jobs, and
Loss of Childcare
YES..AFFORDABILITY
Cost of Living
Cost of Groceries
He will now waste millions of tax dollars to
Distract EPSTEIN
Trump: "We're there now, but we're going to stay until such time as the pop -- proper transition can take place. So we're gonna stay until such time as -- we're gonna run it essentially."
January 3, 2026 at 5:13 PM
This is a FIVE ALARM FIRE🔥
What Next ?
Who Next?
As millions of Americans here in our Country are suffering, Loss of Healthcare Insurance, Loss of Jobs, and
Loss of Childcare
YES..AFFORDABILITY
Cost of Living
Cost of Groceries
He will now waste millions of tax dollars to
Distract EPSTEIN
What Next ?
Who Next?
As millions of Americans here in our Country are suffering, Loss of Healthcare Insurance, Loss of Jobs, and
Loss of Childcare
YES..AFFORDABILITY
Cost of Living
Cost of Groceries
He will now waste millions of tax dollars to
Distract EPSTEIN
Reposted by NA is a delight
Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in VZ?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we've just been completely lied to"
January 3, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in VZ?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we've just been completely lied to"
Reposted by NA is a delight
It’s not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn’t have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
January 3, 2026 at 3:34 PM
It’s not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn’t have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Trump and Co. are betting you’ll put up with paying more for your healthcare (and literally everything else) and forget about those pesky billionaire pedophiles because you’ll be so distracted by him sending your sons and daughters to die for oil in Venezuela
It’s not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn’t have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
It’s about oil and regime change.
And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from his sinking under Epstein and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
January 3, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Trump and Co. are betting you’ll put up with paying more for your healthcare (and literally everything else) and forget about those pesky billionaire pedophiles because you’ll be so distracted by him sending your sons and daughters to die for oil in Venezuela
Reposted by NA is a delight
Donald Trump had no approval from Congress for this unjustified, unauthorized attack on Venezuela. This is what dictators do. We cannot stand idly by while Donald Trump conducts rogue attacks that put American lives further at risk.
January 3, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Donald Trump had no approval from Congress for this unjustified, unauthorized attack on Venezuela. This is what dictators do. We cannot stand idly by while Donald Trump conducts rogue attacks that put American lives further at risk.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Growing up the son of two cops, I remember what it was like watching my mom have to figure out which bills to pay.
I know what families are up against right now, and that’s why I’m focused on bringing down costs and making life affordable again for working class folks.
I know what families are up against right now, and that’s why I’m focused on bringing down costs and making life affordable again for working class folks.
January 2, 2026 at 8:25 PM
Growing up the son of two cops, I remember what it was like watching my mom have to figure out which bills to pay.
I know what families are up against right now, and that’s why I’m focused on bringing down costs and making life affordable again for working class folks.
I know what families are up against right now, and that’s why I’m focused on bringing down costs and making life affordable again for working class folks.
Reposted by NA is a delight
The U.S. Postal Service implemented a rule clarifying that postmarks reflect when mail is processed, not when it is dropped off.
USPS quietly changes how postmarks work — and it could affect mail-in ballots
The U.S. Postal Service implemented a rule clarifying that postmarks reflect when mail is processed, not when it is dropped off.
bit.ly
January 2, 2026 at 10:01 PM
The U.S. Postal Service implemented a rule clarifying that postmarks reflect when mail is processed, not when it is dropped off.
Reposted by NA is a delight
I'm suing the Trump administration for making it harder to protect consumers by illegally trying to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Nearly 2 dozen states sue the Trump administration over funding for CFPB
The attorneys general say the Trump administration is refusing to accept funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which could hurt consumers in their states.
www.npr.org
January 2, 2026 at 9:46 PM
I'm suing the Trump administration for making it harder to protect consumers by illegally trying to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Mamdani: "I cannot blame anyone who has come to question the role of government, whose faith in democracy has been eroded by decades of apathy. We will restore that trust by walking a different path ... "
January 1, 2026 at 7:52 PM
Mamdani: "I cannot blame anyone who has come to question the role of government, whose faith in democracy has been eroded by decades of apathy. We will restore that trust by walking a different path ... "
Reposted by NA is a delight
Zohran Mamdani took over the official NYCMayor account on X after he was sworn in—but the posts from Eric Adams are still up and haven't been archived yet.
A rare social media glitch for Mamdani but the resulting content is amusing.
A rare social media glitch for Mamdani but the resulting content is amusing.
![[avatar of Zohran Mamdani]
Mayor Zohran K. Mamdani
6/29/25
Rats don't have swag.
New Yorkers have swag.
If you don't have swag, gtfo our city.
[video of Eric Adams exterminating for rats]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:gvda6fem6r7selm4gzjjww4a/bafkreiebyrzekk3muqto65ipzzzinsk5kaujkrsvmocoasqxym5nvkd2me@jpeg)
January 1, 2026 at 5:30 PM
Zohran Mamdani took over the official NYCMayor account on X after he was sworn in—but the posts from Eric Adams are still up and haven't been archived yet.
A rare social media glitch for Mamdani but the resulting content is amusing.
A rare social media glitch for Mamdani but the resulting content is amusing.
Reposted by NA is a delight
New York Attorney General Letitia James swears in Zohran Mamdani as New York City's first Muslim mayor in a small ceremony with his family.
January 1, 2026 at 1:49 PM
New York Attorney General Letitia James swears in Zohran Mamdani as New York City's first Muslim mayor in a small ceremony with his family.
Reposted by NA is a delight
“Can’t believe NYC elected a Muslim as mayor.”
In truth—a Black American Christian woman swearing in a Ugandan American Muslim of South Asian ethnicity as his Syrian American wife holds the Qurans he swears in on, all while standing on the steps of a subway station—is the most NYC thing imaginable.
In truth—a Black American Christian woman swearing in a Ugandan American Muslim of South Asian ethnicity as his Syrian American wife holds the Qurans he swears in on, all while standing on the steps of a subway station—is the most NYC thing imaginable.
January 1, 2026 at 11:43 AM
“Can’t believe NYC elected a Muslim as mayor.”
In truth—a Black American Christian woman swearing in a Ugandan American Muslim of South Asian ethnicity as his Syrian American wife holds the Qurans he swears in on, all while standing on the steps of a subway station—is the most NYC thing imaginable.
In truth—a Black American Christian woman swearing in a Ugandan American Muslim of South Asian ethnicity as his Syrian American wife holds the Qurans he swears in on, all while standing on the steps of a subway station—is the most NYC thing imaginable.
Reposted by NA is a delight
To be clear, Trump saying that the release of the Epstein files will hurt his friends is an admission that there is no hoax and that he knows what's in the files.
December 31, 2025 at 1:01 PM
To be clear, Trump saying that the release of the Epstein files will hurt his friends is an admission that there is no hoax and that he knows what's in the files.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Donald Trump’s lying again.
He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down.
He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down.
December 31, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Donald Trump’s lying again.
He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down.
He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
December 31, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Clocked in all year.
Prepared. Unafraid. Always with the receipts.
Keeping that same energy all 2026.
Prepared. Unafraid. Always with the receipts.
Keeping that same energy all 2026.
December 31, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Clocked in all year.
Prepared. Unafraid. Always with the receipts.
Keeping that same energy all 2026.
Prepared. Unafraid. Always with the receipts.
Keeping that same energy all 2026.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
December 31, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
Reposted by NA is a delight
This post is a perfect Trump microcosm: wrong bird (Kestrel), wrong country (Israel), wrong year (2017), but absolute certainty.
December 31, 2025 at 9:55 PM
This post is a perfect Trump microcosm: wrong bird (Kestrel), wrong country (Israel), wrong year (2017), but absolute certainty.
Reposted by NA is a delight
Jack Smith, p. 27: "There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case … [W]hat he was not free to do was violate Federal law and use knowing-- knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function. That he was not allowed to do."
BREAKING:
The House Judiciary Committee just released — on New Year's Eve — the 255-page transcript of Jack Smith's closed door deposition.
House Republicans continue their attempts to bury Smith's testimony.
Read it all here: tinyurl.com/cndtn3ez
The House Judiciary Committee just released — on New Year's Eve — the 255-page transcript of Jack Smith's closed door deposition.
House Republicans continue their attempts to bury Smith's testimony.
Read it all here: tinyurl.com/cndtn3ez
December 31, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Jack Smith, p. 27: "There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case … [W]hat he was not free to do was violate Federal law and use knowing-- knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function. That he was not allowed to do."