化石・現生問わず,後生動物(動物)の初期(主にカンブリア紀以前)の系統・進化などに強い興味を持っています.形態系統学や分子系統学の理論や手法などにも関心があります.
More active in https://x.com/Hoyaboya11
(1/2)
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
yawak.jp/PhyloWeaver/
Load a Newick file and intuitively add/remove/resize branches.
Useful for quick conceptual trees, extracting subtrees, or turning ideas into Newick.
yawak.jp/PhyloWeaver/
Load a Newick file and intuitively add/remove/resize branches.
Useful for quick conceptual trees, extracting subtrees, or turning ideas into Newick.
anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
doi.org/10.1093/bioi...
doi.org/10.1093/bioi...
(1/2)
(2/2)
(2/2)
(1/2)
(1/2)
go.nature.com/4i0i61w
"""
At an extreme, the debate has perhaps revealed more about the effects of phylogenetic modeling approaches, data curation, and their intersection on the results of phylogenomic analyses than about animal relationships.
"""
"""
At an extreme, the debate has perhaps revealed more about the effects of phylogenetic modeling approaches, data curation, and their intersection on the results of phylogenomic analyses than about animal relationships.
"""
Is it sponges (panels A & B) or comb jellies (C & D) that root the animal tree of life?
For over 15 years, #phylogenomic studies have been divided.
We provide new evidence suggesting that...
🔗: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Is it sponges (panels A & B) or comb jellies (C & D) that root the animal tree of life?
For over 15 years, #phylogenomic studies have been divided.
We provide new evidence suggesting that...
🔗: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
go.nature.com/4i0i61w
go.nature.com/4i0i61w
Available as book, on kindle and as audio.
I would be really grateful for reposts.
www.amazon.com/Tree-Life-So...
www.amazon.ca/Tree-Life-So...
Available as book, on kindle and as audio.
I would be really grateful for reposts.
www.amazon.com/Tree-Life-So...
www.amazon.ca/Tree-Life-So...
www.cell.com/current-biol...
I wonder what this topology means for the origins of Bryozoans?
www.cell.com/current-biol...
I wonder what this topology means for the origins of Bryozoans?
Super excited to see this work out in Current Biology - we sequenced a phoronid genome and used shared chromosome fusions to confirm the monophyly of Lophophorata.
A big team effort from the Luo Lab @yjluo.bsky.social!
More here: authors.elsevier.com/c/1m3mV3QW8S...
Super excited to see this work out in Current Biology - we sequenced a phoronid genome and used shared chromosome fusions to confirm the monophyly of Lophophorata.
A big team effort from the Luo Lab @yjluo.bsky.social!
More here: authors.elsevier.com/c/1m3mV3QW8S...
This article supports once more the hypothesis that sponges (and therefore animals) emerged about 100 million years before the Cambrian, and before we find any animal fossils.
www.pnas.org/doi/suppl/10...
This article supports once more the hypothesis that sponges (and therefore animals) emerged about 100 million years before the Cambrian, and before we find any animal fossils.
www.pnas.org/doi/suppl/10...
www.cell.com/current-biol...
www.cell.com/current-biol...
* Telford’s expertise and voice shine through
* I think fossils are more useful than portrayed, and would have represented historical figures in evolutionary biology differently
* It’s a fun and informative guide to the wonder and wizardry of phylogenetics ✨
* Telford’s expertise and voice shine through
* I think fossils are more useful than portrayed, and would have represented historical figures in evolutionary biology differently
* It’s a fun and informative guide to the wonder and wizardry of phylogenetics ✨