zawn.substack.com/p/why-do-so-...
zawn.substack.com/p/why-do-so-...
this is what people mean by trans genocide
if a type of person does not officially exist, then any harm against them cannot be measured or reported
this headline change isn't even being caused by an executive order
it's simply the NYT editors deciding we don't deserve to exist
this is what people mean by trans genocide
if a type of person does not officially exist, then any harm against them cannot be measured or reported
this headline change isn't even being caused by an executive order
it's simply the NYT editors deciding we don't deserve to exist
They want trans people to stop existing. They will ban best practice care, replace it with nothing.
They want unwanted babies to traffic. They will restrict contraception and education.
They want trans people to stop existing. They will ban best practice care, replace it with nothing.
They want unwanted babies to traffic. They will restrict contraception and education.
I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shaw www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shaw www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
It would. Because they would say Nazi shit. Instead of refusing to ban Nazism, Twitter stopped enforcing bans.
It would. Because they would say Nazi shit. Instead of refusing to ban Nazism, Twitter stopped enforcing bans.
this thread is for you.
First: prompt questions to get you started.
What would someone who can't see the image need to know about it in order to take part in the conversation? What is it about this image that made you choose it? What are the important details someone who could see the image would take away from it?
(Not for images of text.)