Cap
@captain7bag.bsky.social
MD, sports med, mathematical modeling of physiology and sports performance, cycling, goes by Michael Puchowicz in the common world
I had a revelation that Cleveland is the pancreas of the US cc @courier429.bsky.social
January 4, 2026 at 7:23 PM
I had a revelation that Cleveland is the pancreas of the US cc @courier429.bsky.social
This got me blocked? ok… ironic because this Venezuela is literally a gangsters of capitalism reboot www.msn.com/en-us/money/...
January 4, 2026 at 5:29 PM
This got me blocked? ok… ironic because this Venezuela is literally a gangsters of capitalism reboot www.msn.com/en-us/money/...
pokes gangsters of capitalism with a stick
January 4, 2026 at 12:46 AM
pokes gangsters of capitalism with a stick
Pedro feex later
Big South Of The Border aesthetic
I’m currently at the Washington Monument:
January 1, 2026 at 1:59 AM
Pedro feex later
how much cocaine has this guy done?
I have ridden elevators with Mick Jagger and Ronald Reagan. On different occasions. I have been in a supermarket with Ozzy Osbourne and Elvis Costello. Same occasion.
Right folks. Feeling rather down at the moment so bringing back an oldie
Please Quote this with your most minor celebrity interaction
Please Quote this with your most minor celebrity interaction
December 30, 2025 at 1:38 AM
how much cocaine has this guy done?
Damn kid … I really enjoy audio books but I definitely miss the physical interaction with a cheap paperback.
Too early for a New Year’s resolution? Too bad. I will no longer read my phone during the long, dark tea-time of the soul. When I can’t sleep, I am going to read one of the books in the giant pile on my nightstand.
December 26, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Damn kid … I really enjoy audio books but I definitely miss the physical interaction with a cheap paperback.
Here me out, un-redacting the Epstein files are the EXACT type of task that AI has been trained for: given a set of tokens, what are the most likely associated tokens
December 24, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Here me out, un-redacting the Epstein files are the EXACT type of task that AI has been trained for: given a set of tokens, what are the most likely associated tokens
Listen, Superman is really an allegory about severe seasonal affective disorder
December 21, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Listen, Superman is really an allegory about severe seasonal affective disorder
the sun is well up, but it’s still effing dark. not like dark like night but dark like not enough sun
December 21, 2025 at 3:45 PM
the sun is well up, but it’s still effing dark. not like dark like night but dark like not enough sun
How is it this dark in the morning?
December 19, 2025 at 1:41 PM
How is it this dark in the morning?
I’m just here to say that I refuse to listen to war hammer lore , I don’t care what @courier429.bsky.social says
December 19, 2025 at 5:14 AM
I’m just here to say that I refuse to listen to war hammer lore , I don’t care what @courier429.bsky.social says
Reposted by Cap
if tumblr dies I need this video to make it's seasonal rotation here instead just in case, Happy holidays 🎄
December 18, 2025 at 2:05 AM
if tumblr dies I need this video to make it's seasonal rotation here instead just in case, Happy holidays 🎄
December 19, 2025 at 5:04 AM
When you think about it, it’s weird that scientific journals frown about AI generated papers …
"we only used AI to..."
You want me to pay for something you didn't want to pay to create.
You want me to pay for something you didn't want to pay to create.
December 19, 2025 at 5:01 AM
When you think about it, it’s weird that scientific journals frown about AI generated papers …
shit deleted the last two that was bikini kill not pussy riot … not sure how you confuse the two honestly
December 17, 2025 at 2:50 AM
shit deleted the last two that was bikini kill not pussy riot … not sure how you confuse the two honestly
I’m only found out about Welles because he covered you let my tires down by tropical fuck storm
December 17, 2025 at 2:47 AM
I’m only found out about Welles because he covered you let my tires down by tropical fuck storm
no I don’t listen to Rogan he interviewed Welles so there you go
December 17, 2025 at 2:46 AM
no I don’t listen to Rogan he interviewed Welles so there you go
I love how Joe Rogan is like yeah I get it but if you hurt your shoulder you want the best like you want the guy who does surgery on the Lakers and Jesse Welles is like look I just want to be able to go to an urgent care and get a pack of antibiotics and it not be $500.
December 17, 2025 at 2:45 AM
I love how Joe Rogan is like yeah I get it but if you hurt your shoulder you want the best like you want the guy who does surgery on the Lakers and Jesse Welles is like look I just want to be able to go to an urgent care and get a pack of antibiotics and it not be $500.
Sounds on brand for us
Arizona, the model for voucher programs across the country, spent so much money paying private schoolers’ tuition that it faced hundreds of millions in budget cuts to critical state programs and projects last year.
(Published July 2024)
(Published July 2024)
School Vouchers Were Supposed to Save Taxpayer Money. Instead They Blew a Massive Hole in Arizona’s Budget.
Arizona, the model for voucher programs across the country, has spent so much money paying private schoolers’ tuition that it’s now facing hundreds of millions in budget cuts to critical state program...
www.propublica.org
December 16, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Sounds on brand for us
Reposted by Cap
Today's email to an associate editor, declining to review for a big corporate publisher. This one focuses on Nature Publishing Group's practice of funneling rejected manuscripts to their newer journals with hefty APCs.
![Dear Dr. [redacted],
It was nice to meet you at the [redacted]!
Thanks for thinking of me as a possible reviewer, as I am interested in the topic. However, I decline to review this manuscript - I often do this in the case of journals published by profiteering corporate publishers. For Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group charges an outrageous US$6990 to authors that has little to do with higher-quality service or journal processes and lots to do with a legacy first-mover advantage that it uses to exploit academia. This is rentier capitalism.
NPG funnels papers they reject from their most prestigious outlets to their newer subsidiary journals such as Nature Communications and Nature Communications Psychology, which academics go along with because they don’t (directly) foot the bill, and because, given the pressure academics are under to publish rapidly, they wish to take advantage of the reviews they may have already received from the higher-tier Nature journal. Because we are now live in a world where most studies can eventually be published somewhere, NPG has been able to exploit this by creating their own lower-tier journals and charging high-aspiration authors for the convenience.
This practice conflicts with my interest in universities and funders not wasting their money, which is why I do not wish to support it by contributing to the hundreds of millions of dollars of labor that academics donate to corporate publishers. Instead, I preferentially review, and volunteer as an editor for, diamond open access journals that are free to read and publish in.
For various reasons, including combating this strategy by which corporate publishers are extending the era in which they profiteer from university funds, many academics and funders now advocate for the Publish->Review->Curate model, in which academics publish their work immediately (on preprint servers, which prevents gatekeeping by editors), and then get it peer reviewed, preferably through low-cost…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:kynaetyuzsp46xejc6mzpjle/bafkreiaoe55bbl7zqu7nkhem6uy74kmqxc5pkassyn5ofayrfwxy7my3ia@jpeg)
October 19, 2025 at 5:55 AM
Today's email to an associate editor, declining to review for a big corporate publisher. This one focuses on Nature Publishing Group's practice of funneling rejected manuscripts to their newer journals with hefty APCs.
If we think about the relative contribution of W’ vs CP to MMP at 60s 30,000kj/60s = 500w/300w at 600s 30,000kj/600s = 50w/300w … it makes sense that we see FPC1 pacing range at 60s vs 600s
December 12, 2025 at 7:13 PM
If we think about the relative contribution of W’ vs CP to MMP at 60s 30,000kj/60s = 500w/300w at 600s 30,000kj/600s = 50w/300w … it makes sense that we see FPC1 pacing range at 60s vs 600s