Jonathan H. Adler
LightNews LightNews
banner
jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler
@jadler1969.bsky.social
14K followers 670 following 1.6K posts

Father, Husband, W&M LawProf, guy with opinions; @chkbal co-founder;
@volokhc.bsky.social contributor;
Law before policy before politics;
Philly sports always;
'the cowbell of Twitter'-N. Schulz
typos are part of the brand. .. more

Videos

Jonathan H. Adler is a conservative American legal commentator and law professor at William & Mary Law School. He has been recognized as one of the most cited professors in the field of environmental law. His research is also credited with inspiring litigation that challenged the Obama Administration's implementation of the Affordable Care Act, resulting in the Supreme Court's decision in King v. Burwell. .. more

Economics 28%
Law 23%
Posts Replies Media Videos

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · 9d
Nothing says "this is a serious matter" more than issuing an order on February 31st.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · 9d
Federal judge rightly rejects Minnesota's bad federalism arguments
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Federal District Court Judge Rejects Minnesota's Anti-Commandeering Arguments Against DHS "Operation Metro Surge" (and with Good Reason)
Speaking of commandeering, today in Minnesota v. Trump, federal district court Judge Kate Menendez rejected Minnesota's request for an injunction against…
reason.com

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 9d
BREAKING: Judge Katherine Menendez denies Minnesota, Minneapolis, and St. Paul’s request for a TRO or preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration’s Operation Metro Surge on Tenth Amendment grounds.

Background at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/p/challengin...
In recent weeks, several thousand federal agents have arrived in Minnesota and its two largest cities as part of "Operation Metro Surge," an immigration enforcement campaign. The flood of federal agents has had profound effects on Minnesotans, requiring the State and the cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul to respond in many ways. In this case, Plaintiffs (the State of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Saint Paul), ask the Court to declare that the unprecedented surge of Defendants' agents in Minnesota is unconstitutional and unlawful, and enter an injunction halting Operation Metro Surge. (Dkt. 1 at 76-77.') To that end, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 7), which the Court converted to a motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. 21). The Court pauses to observe what it is not deciding. At this stage, the Court makes no final determination on the merits of any claims asserted by Plaintiffs. Nor does the Court offer any opinion about the wisdom of Operation Metro Surge. And the legality of many of the specific actions taken by federal agents during the operation is not before the Court in this case. Instead, the Court only decides whether to grant the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction halting a federal law enforcement operation based upon the Tenth Amendment. In answering this question, the Court must view Plaintiffs' claims through the lens of the specific legal framework they invoke, and, having done so, finds that Plaintiffs have not met their burden. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.

Reposted by Andrew Scott, Steven French, Elizabeth Stokoe , and 1 more

emilybell.bsky.social
Emily Bell @emilybell.bsky.social · 17d
Apart from anything else there are no penguins in Greenland. Unless he’s invading the South Pole too….

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

orinkerr.bsky.social
Orin Kerr @orinkerr.bsky.social · 24d
BIG IN THE 4A WORLD: The Supreme Court has granted cert in Chatrie, the geofence warrant case, to decide the following Q: "Whether the execution of the geofence warrant violated the Fourth Amendment." (I assume this includes both whether a "search" happened and whether the warrant was lawful.)

Reposted by David H. Kaye, Jonathan H. Adler, Julian Webb , and 3 more

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

neorsd.org
NE Ohio Regional Sewer District @neorsd.org · 28d
dun dun. neorsd.buzzsprout.com/1924356/epis...
image of stars of Law & Order, but memed to have each star sharing a pair of wired ear buds, listening to a phone in his pocket showing the Clean Water Works podcast on screen.

Reposted by Scott A. Imberman

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 10
Perhaps I'm old-fashioned, but when a govt agent kills someone, I don't think gov't officials should make public statements about the lawfulness or justification of the killing prior to an actual investigation.

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · Jan 9
NEW: The Supreme Court grants review in several new cases.

These (and likely next week’s grants) will be heard this term. Grants after that, unless expedited, will be heard sometime in the term that starts in October 2026.
CORDER LIST: 607 U.S.) FRIDAY, JANUARY 9, 2026 24-1046 ORDER IN PENDING CASE WOLFORD, JASON, ET AL. V. LOPEZ, ATT'Y GEN. OF HI The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. 24-856 25-406 25-567 25-429 25-466 CERTIORARI GRANTED CISCO SYS., INC., ET AL. V. DOE I, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition. FCC, ET AL. V. AT&T, INC. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. V. FCC, ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. BONDI, ATT'Y GEN. V. LAU, MUK C. SRIPETCH, ONGKARUCK V. SEC The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 8
What could go wrong?

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 7
Worthwhile thread
epps.bsky.social Dan Epps @epps.bsky.social · Jan 7
Pretty sure I'm one of the folks Mark's subtweeting. While I don’t feel compelled to respond, this actually provides a beautiful lesson for how academics and other serious observers might think about engaging with the Court and law. (thread)
mjsdc.bsky.social Mark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · Jan 5
There's a rising faction of the legal academy that stays quiet when their MAGAdemic colleagues produce fraudulent psuedo-scholarship in service to the cruelest aspects of Trump's agenda ... then leap in to police the discourse when their progressive colleagues criticize those MAGAdemics too bluntly.

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · Jan 7
NEW: An ICE officer killed a person in broad daylight in Minneapolis today — with posted video appearing to contradict the DHS statement claiming self-defense, as the driver appeared to be attempting to drive away when shot.

MPR: www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...

Video: bsky.app/profile/dani...

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler, Orin S. Kerr

epps.bsky.social
Dan Epps @epps.bsky.social · Jan 7
Pretty sure I'm one of the folks Mark's subtweeting. While I don’t feel compelled to respond, this actually provides a beautiful lesson for how academics and other serious observers might think about engaging with the Court and law. (thread)
mjsdc.bsky.social Mark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · Jan 5
There's a rising faction of the legal academy that stays quiet when their MAGAdemic colleagues produce fraudulent psuedo-scholarship in service to the cruelest aspects of Trump's agenda ... then leap in to police the discourse when their progressive colleagues criticize those MAGAdemics too bluntly.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 6
More here:
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Does the Supreme Court Favor the Rich?
Today's New York Times reports on a new study by three economists purporting to show that the Supreme Court's decisions are…
reason.com

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 6
I've written up some of my concerns with the study.
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Does the Supreme Court Favor the Rich?
Today's New York Times reports on a new study by three economists purporting to show that the Supreme Court's decisions are…
reason.com

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 6
Just when you think RFK cant be any worse . . .

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

wsj.com
The Wall Street Journal @wsj.com · Jan 6
The wildfire disaster caused billions in losses, and many homeowners are still waiting for insurance payouts and permits to rebuild. on.wsj.com/3Z2Xs84
A Year After Fires, L.A.’s Rocky Recovery Is Shaped by Wealth, Insurance and Red Tape
The wildfire disaster caused billions in losses, and many homeowners are still waiting for insurance payouts and permits to rebuild.
on.wsj.com

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 6
As always, it's compared to what.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 6
Pretty close

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
I'm a big fan.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
Because collective forms of decision-making can never reveal and actualize preferences?

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
You're attributing to me positions I have not taken in this context.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
No.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
About that NYT story on SCOTUS favoring the rich

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
I've learned quite a bot from legal scholars (incl. Some you mention), as well as from working on tribal cases, from seminars and empirical working these subjects, and time in and around reservations. Again, my focus is on institutional arrangements, not selecting particular voices.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
It's not about anointing one set of perspectives but rather aspiring toward a set of institutional arrangements that will allow the relevant preferences to be revealed actualized in practice.

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Does the Supreme Court Favor the Rich?
Today's New York Times reports on a new study by three economists purporting to show that the Supreme Court's decisions are…
reason.com

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
Yeah, the problem here is deeper though. Even on its own terms, this study is a mess.
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Does the Supreme Court Favor the Rich?
Today's New York Times reports on a new study by three economists purporting to show that the Supreme Court's decisions are…
reason.com

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
More like: "I want you to have the autonomy and ability to pursue your own interest as you conceive of it."

jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · Jan 5
I am very much so interested. I don't presume that public law scholars in the field are necessarily representative of such perspectives, or that the trust relationship s a good means of empowering or operationalizing those perspectives.